Devils Den:Darr ka doosra naam Maan Singh Khurana - Page 35

@Sia: Even I am dying for a tension-filled confrontation of Maaneet which we haven't seen in ages now, not since the Dev-blood fiasco. And you know, it just so happens that their most heated confrontations usually happen with Maan shirtless, either during, before, after or any combination of the three. So bring it on!!! ☺️☺️☺️

They also have never showed a situation where both Maaneet are angry at each other. It has always been one angry and one begging for an apology. I want to see how they act, living together when both of them are not seeing eye to eye. I think it could be really new and of course really hawt.

@Anu and Jyoti: Yep, agree with you guys that this type of blind herogiri is MSK's ishtyle funda, and it usually works, but it is now giving Geet sleepless nights, instead of giving her much needed peace of mind. And Anu, even I want to see her give him a piece of her mind for not including her in the plan and he can be angry that she doesn't understand why he couldn't take her.

Each will be fighting angrily because they want the other to be safe. How Maaneet. 😳

Originally posted by: Meetu_Anu

@Jyoti, Samy

Answer me na...Do u feel that Jwellary putting on Geet's b'day would have been done in a bit more HOT way??...Like Amritsar Jwellary puting sequence which was ONE OF THE HOTTEST IN INDIAN TV😎

Bolo na🤔

Anu both situations were different ..during Amritsar jewellery scene there was no tension between both ...they were enjoying the whole moment ...so it was hotter

Originally posted by: Meetu_Anu

@Jyoti, Samy

Answer me na...Do u feel that Jwellary putting on Geet's b'day would have been done in a bit more HOT way??...Like Amritsar Jwellary puting sequence which was ONE OF THE HOTTEST IN INDIAN TV😎

Bolo na🤔

I think a similar logic for why the song sequence wasn't a hot hot one applies to the jewellery sequence here. On KC, they were stealing a few precious, private moments to celebrate the festival of love. That moment was just about them and their love. It was also the first big milestone after their reunion and so they were feeling more bonded and close than ever. So feelings, including happiness, love, desire, were running high. Maan was loving Geet with every touch, every gesture.

On the other hand, in the birthday jewellery scene, it was not just Maan and Geet in the mental picture. There was an invasion of a third party that was bothering Geet so Maan had to give her comfort and reassurance rather than showing their mutual desire. I guess Geet was feeling disoriented by another man trying to claim her so with every gesture here, different from KC, Maan wasn't declaring his love exactly, but his ownership. With every piece of jewellery he was saying, you are mine and nobody can take you away, which was perfectly capped by the sindoor.

On a technical level the hotness factor was reduced because they didn't hug in the end the way they did in A'sar (with his hand holding her neck, ishh!) but she leaned on him for support, and they didn't show the dori or the waistband which were the hottest parts of A'sar. But like I said, I think the purpose of the scene was different here.

@Jyoti

Originally posted by: skg267

I think a similar logic for why the song sequence wasn't a hot hot one applies to the jewellery sequence here. On KC, they were stealing a few precious, private moments to celebrate the festival of love. That moment was just about them and their love. It was also the first big milestone after their reunion and so they were feeling more bonded and close than ever. So feelings, including happiness, love, desire, were running high. Maan was loving Geet with every touch, every gesture.

On the other hand, in the birthday jewellery scene, it was not just Maan and Geet in the mental picture. There was an invasion of a third party that was bothering Geet so Maan had to give her comfort and reassurance rather than showing their mutual desire. I guess Geet was feeling disoriented by another man trying to claim her so with every gesture here, different from KC, Maan wasn't declaring his love exactly, but his ownership. With every piece of jewellery he was saying, you are mine and nobody can take you away, which was perfectly capped by the sindoor.

On a technical level the hotness factor was reduced because they didn't hug in the end the way they did in A'sar (with his hand holding her neck, ishh!) but she leaned on him for support, and they didn't show the dori or the waistband which were the hottest parts of A'sar. But like I said, I think the purpose of the scene was different here.

🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

THANKUUU🤗🤗

@Jyoti, Samy

@Anu: I agree. I find the whole possessive man declaring that a woman is his and his alone really hot! I think that is why the sindoor was there as well. It was Maan telling Geet and the world that she is HIS wife!

MSK was all SADDA HAQ, b**hes!!! 😡

☺️☺️☺️☺️

@Sam
Exactly.. Now I want geet to actually blast off at Maan for lying to her.. N maan to get angry for not understanding .. That it wld hav been risky for him to take her n all that..
I dont want geet to cry n all.. N maan begging for apology..
Just some tension btwn them.. At least for sometime.. Then they can hav some passionate scenes afterwards...

Actually the birthday jewellery scene and dance was hot in its own way as it showed the emotional bonding between both and how even in times of crisis and fear they just continue to smile and dance to glory in each other's arms 😳...

@Jyoti n Sam
Agree with both of u.. Both wer in totally different scenario all together..
Geet's expression said it all.. In A'sar it was longing n desire.. N on Bday it was safety n support from Maan..
I dont know if I made ny sense.. 😆 😆