Right or wrong??????? - Page 2

I think Geet is wrong....

Maan has given enough proof to geet bout him being involved in baby to the same extent as her. Docs appointments, cravings, learning bout pregnancy n new born, girl/boy, color & much much more... So he has lost a most loved baby too!!...

For maan whose baby it is doesnt matter... for him the only fact is enough that he loves a girl Geet who is gonna be a mother of a child & whoever is dearer to her is dearer to him as well.

I don't understand why is geet suddenly so insecured & why is she emotionally detached from Maan- the only person who stood by her in pain & despair...

Imagine a guy roaming in front of him day n nite who has seen his wife without clothes (his own relationship infact has not reached this far yet)... if it was some other guy he would imagine that nite each time he saw them together... dil kitna dukhta hoga...but such is not the case with Maan.. he places his love for geet before anything else...

yeh ladki bhi na sacchh mein kam akkal hi hai... 😒

Originally posted by: an12345678

I have not seen the show from the beginning but still understand the sentiments behind those words. The girl said in one of the episodes ... I became a mother before you became part of my life, and her life revolved around that baby. MSK just happened en route but the lost baby was what defined her character.

What is right or wrong in that? Some times a woman needs to think from the perspective of a woman.

Originally posted by: verode

You know dear MSK is not just a happened thing in her life. The baby she talks about was saved by him

Did you understand what me wrote? He happened in her life. Yes, he saved her but did not define her character. The baby defined her character and the groW*H of the character. Take out the baby from the picture and Geet has no identity.

A show should been seen as a story and most of us fail to do so because we get most of the time attached to characters and actors. Think from the story perspective and trace back her journey, you won't find any fault in that statement.

Originally posted by: verode

You know dear MSK is not just a happened thing in her life. The baby she talks about was saved by him

For a mother ,a child is the most important in her life and the child will always come first.So if geet has told that child was her life i dont find it wrong afterall she is a mother.

if i think only practical then geet is wrong because msk has done alot for geet which is not even measreable. so she shouldn't have done it but if i see her condition that she just lost her that baby for which she fought with everyone in her family. she left her family and everything just for this baby. and also her mentally condition is not well as well because she is going through the grieving period then i think she is not wrong. i am not saying that she is right but just because of timing and condition and atmosphere she had around so she said this

Originally posted by: an12345678

Did you understand what me wrote? He happened in her life. Yes, he saved her but did not define her character. The baby defined her character and the groW*H of the character. Take out the baby from the picture and Geet has no identity.

A show should been seen as a story and most of us fail to do so because we get most of the time attached to characters and actors. Think from the story perspective and trace back her journey, you won't find any fault in that statement.

i am agree with u veena.she is wrong.use yeh nahi kehna chahiye tha.

Originally posted by: -pixie-

and for that she must owe him her identity and self respect? Surely any relationship that is based on such expectations and obligations cannot be love at all!

Ria_sengupta: Thank you for the reply 😊 Let me comprehend what you meant and then said. Okay, I think if I am not wrong: you meant to say: Mann is a flawless human being and Geet is blessed to have him in her life.

Geet has an identity of her own (and it's important for a girl to have her identity, according to me, irrespective of whether she is in love or a God is part of her life) and that child gave her that identity. She experienced the feeling of motherhood first, and later the man became a part of her life. Did she say, I value you less or you do not matter to me. She just said : The baby was the most important part of her life. Plus, people grieve in different ways. Yes MSK accepted the baby as his own but the baby was growing in the womb of the girl. Imagine the emptiness that she must be feeling when the baby is no more in her womb.

Who is saying, the actress is being bashed here. Just said see the show as a story and trace back the journey of the protagonist: You won't find fault in that statement.