FF-Paradox- M&G- THREAD 5 - Page 77

Originally posted by: dia_ditz

If love tat exist between two souls is stronger,then they can conquer over all odds!!!

so basically,will accept her!!!

Originally posted by: Nik.freebird

hey muskan ans would b lyk dis !!basicaly no one would acept such gal bt wnt refuse if boy luvs d gal 2 much!she is nt at fault n deserve al hapines!so i would acept sam if d boy luvs her !!n babies cn b adoptd also!we indians may have chngd a lot bt stil it take tym 4 chnges n ppl are hipocrates kehne ko toh dey gal r nt les dn boys bt stil gals gets secondary conditn!

Originally posted by: aditiwalia56

Well its a good quetion...... As a HUMAN BEING I WILL ACCEPT HER IN MY LIFE SHE WAS YOUNG INVOLVE WID WRONG GUY SHE IS NOT AT FAULT....... As a SISTER MAY BE I ACCEPT HER IN My BRO LIFE IF HE REALLY LOVE HER........ But As a MOTHER???? Not because she got pregnant nd all But I WANT MY GRANDCHILDRENS BUT..... HER I M BIT SHELFISH..... BUT IF HE REALLY LOVE HER SO DEY CAN ADOPT CHILDRENS BUT AT DIS POINT AVANTIKA IS RYT....... As a mother she can be lil selfish...... Its most honest answer by me

Originally posted by: smj1977

i don't know what others say

but if I were Brij's mother I would have wanted him to marry Sameera and if she refuses would have taken her responsibility rather then letting her to live at Maan's place

and if I were Maan's mother, and IF I say IF Maan loved Sam I would never object to him marrying her but only if he Loves her

and about she not been able to conceive again I would say that she was equally wrong sleeping with brij was not a forced decision she agreed to him,

I also blame Sameera's parents for disowning her at that point of her life

but what has Maan done wrong, he supported her out of sympathy and here his love life is being ruined

he is not in love with her then why this question of marriage arises?

its clear his love is Geet let that be

find some other man for her who would accept her for love not sympathy

hope I am clear

Shruti

Originally posted by: sonalinaik2006

I second her 😊

Originally posted by: PaintedSky

Actually it depends and varies with person to person, If I'm a mother or sister I may not accept her. But If I'm her lover I'll accept her in my life. Love has no boundaries. But as a mother or sister I'll ensure that my family extends vertically.

And one more thing now a days being able to be a mother doesn't matter. If somebody can love her then he might accept her with her flaws. Totally depend on "unconditional love"

Originally posted by: love-water

A- very good q! To be honest I don't know how to answer this. If maan loved her then yes but here situation is completly different. Sam have no one. She is responsible for this days. No one els. Brij is the main cause so they should sault this out.
Bc to maans mother who would want there son to be married to a girl who could never concive! It's different if maan lOved her! But he Dosn't. He is only doing out of sympothy.

Originally posted by: swetha10

Nice ques...

well being an woman i would welcome her with open arms unless i am sure tht the person in family loves her truly.. well she not being able to conceive can be overcome by the mutual love n respect..

the most important aspect should be understanding.. if it exists in a relationship then it is surely not difficult to accept your flaws..

no person is perfect... we all make mistakes.. the ability to accept them is most important...

Originally posted by: mirnalini

Yes, I think I'll accept her.

Being A woman myself, I think there are many shades to a woman.

She is a daughter, a wife, a sister, a mother, but most importantly, she is a human being.

Why are women expected to play these cliched roles and only give out? A woman has feelings and emotions of her own, and she needs to be respected for who she is.

So what if a woman can't concieve, that doesn't mean there is anything wrong with her. She just has a problem.

And being unable to give birth does not make her incapable of being a good mother. I mean, there are so many orphaned children who need parents. Adoption is always a good idea.

But I think our society is still not completely ready to open up to such ideas. Not everyone is able to open mindedly greet such issues.

What must be kept in mind is that women like Sam in this story have already been scarred for life, and we need to sooth their pain and help them. Not remind them of their loss.

Also, if I'm a mother in law, then why should I see my future daughter in law as a bearer of responsibilities, or a source of grand children, if I'm getting her married to my son, then I'm having an addition to my family, not a free of cost servant. I'm welcoming another child to my home, so what if she has a flaw, we none of us are perfect, and if she's amiable, then why not work past this fact and probably go for adoption.

JUST MY POV

PLZ THIS IS NOT TO HURT ANYONE'S FEELINGS

and btw HAPPY WOMEN'S DAY TO ALL!!!!😳

Originally posted by: basicquestion1

even though i may comeout very backward n low but i'll tell u the way i feel about this question.

to me it's all in the perspective..if i know that sam was having sex without being married..there is no way i wud want her near my son.

if i know that a girl was raped and she wasn't having sum serious fun at the time...it wasn't her decision to loose her chastity.....i wudn't care if she give us an heir or not. i wud tell my son to support her so very much and they can adopt if they want a baby. as a family we'll support the adoption and the hurt girl very much.

in case of sam i do not pity her one bit. she was too young of a girl to go after brij. it's not she investgated brij or was soon to b married or was even proposed. to me that's a low charecter girl. really can't c the side"oh she was just a kid" if she was a kid she should have ran after willie wonka's candy not a boy's candy🤬