In my own experiences, I have seen a lot of people speak or advise the quotes of others without meaning them. I have also met with a lot of other people who do not know whether or not an anology or principle will apply to a certain situation or not. There are also some others that will attempt to justify their own conclusion by knowingly using quotes, anologies or principles that do not apply. (Ever seen ads for spurious products that quote a lot of "scientific" advice)
Coming to the point; In singing, arts, performing; the Basic Stuff, usually You have it or You do not have it. To put it in the context of our discussion here, it is the basic DNA; You are a Gadha or you are a Godha.
Qazi has shown that he has it in him, that he is a young nasli Ghoda. It is definetely just a matter of training by the faculty and his own Riyaz that is going to take him further. If you have tried your hand (maybe throat) at singing, the difference between Ghada and Ghoda will be obvious. Even without a formal singing "degree" (let me know how many of the top 10 singers have these degrees), he got the endorsment of the Maharathi judges for several of his performances. Consistency will certainly build over time.
Enjoy yourselves. Take it easy.
When applied to singing it means that ... in order to become an 80 percent singer one needs to spend 20% effort .... and in order to achieve the remaining 20%, 80% more effort is required .... most of the contestants in Fame Gurukul are/were putting their effort to achieve the remaining 20% and I think they were doing that even before they came to FG ....