Originally posted by: sakhi800
First of all i do not understand all this hoopla about Qazi.. he deserved to be in the Fame jodi and he is now!!
Any game in gurukul be it the lawyer game or the debate used to be about qazi.. Was FG a competition of games, and was Qazi selected because he managed to be the topic of discussion??....LOL..
for example in the game where students were having a debate involving rex, arpita and qazi where they had to state their strong and weak points.. the focus went away from that concept and was centered around badmouthing Qazi.. Rex and Arpita shouted their throats hoarse by talking mean things about Qazi and Padma ma'm was enjoying herself instead of telling the students that the whole idea of the game was not bad points on Qazi but to talk about their own strengths and weaknesses.
Their badmouthing Qazi was wrong. I agree with it, as real competition should speak in performance rather than in words. Nonetheless, these guys were better singers than Qazi. Though that doesn't give them the right to badmouth anybody, still, being better singers, they should have stood a better chance to be the FJ than Qazi.
the whole idea is to appreciate Qazi that inspite of so many negativity around him he emerged as the winner
The basic idea was of winning. Not winning "inspite of so many negativity...". Obstacles were there in almost every other competitor's way, and they were not just badmouthing. Far more than that. But that is not the issue. The issue is singing superior to others and being the FJ. Qazi was clearly not the best singer.
and guys all of us have to agree that in the end his singing was the best even in the top 4 where the judges themselves made him safe..
So let us all appreciate the fact and like sosweet i do agree that this FJ was the best..