Originally posted by: .Vrish.
Confronted her in the restroom
Threatened rape
Red - when was that?Arjun v Radhika - Arjun is dealing w/ a very nosey girl who has nothing better to do than to interfere in his personal affairs. She is an employee of the same company that he works in, but gets into his face for the sake of her friend Sam - not sure whether w/ or w/o her endorsement. She is nobody of his.
Let's look at what he was reacting/responding to, b4 playing the gender card.
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Red - When a guy drives off with you, after making cryptic comments about women alone with a man, he is not talking about taking you to watch the latest movie.He may have just intended to scare her but his intention alone does not count.
When you start expanding the scope of how rape is defined, that ends up - wittingly or unwittingly - eroding the seriousness of the crime. Of course, his intention alone counts. If someone threatens rape for the purpose of actually doing it, it's a crime. If someone
is just issuing an empty threat in the hope of scaring the girl off, it's certainly not
rape. Yeah, he may be very tawdry in resorting to
that tactic, but no. With these sort of definitions, the next time someone is raped, you'll see questions come up like 'rape as in...?' Something that few would like to see occur.
Also, my reading of the scene you described - Arjun made cryptic comments about her being alone w/ him in order to threaten to blacken her
reputation, which is nowhere even close to rape. Granted that in an Indian environment, it has the potential of destroying one aspect of one's life in other ways, but equating it to rape is sensationalizing it.
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Blue - Gender card? Unless you are defending yourself, physical attacks are not justified regardless of gender. Lets look at the entirety of the argument before we go on ad hominem attacks, shall we?
I didn't justify his attacks. I did say that she has provoked him by getting in his way. Let's say Neil decided to come in his way, instead of Radhika. Those 2 would have gotten into fistcuffs. Radhika has gotten away w/ what she has b'cos she's a gal, and Arjun, despite being a sociopath, does seem to draw a line somewhere about how far he's willing to hurt her.
It's easy to say that physical attacks are never justified unless one is acting in self defense. That said, if someone is always being sabotaged by another person, there will come a time when he'll snap. Let's look at it from his POV. His 'sister' has apparently been wronged, and he's out to avenge her (put aside for the moment that it's unjustified - that's not been revealed so far). He goes after the daughter of the man who did it. So anyone who comes in b/w is an obstacle, so he deals w/ them in various ways. Am I saying that he's a hero for doing that? No. Is he justified? No. But does he have a reason? Absolutely!
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Rest of it - If I saw that a person is about to harm a friend or a family member, I would be going after them too., Granted my methods would be different Calling the cops comes to mind. But since Rads does not have any proof, asking her parents for help would be another or even informing Neil. I think I have made enough posts making fun of Rads and her Superhero methods.
Informing Neil, and working at tandem w/ him would have been a better idea, if cops were out of the question. Setting up a sting operation so that Arjun gets arrested would have been the right course of action. She could have told Sam's parents what she knows, and taken their help as well. Doing what she does the way she does it makes for good TV, but is pretty idiotic on her part, as well as being nosey.
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Rads' lack of response - Of course she is wrong not to respond. Especially since this is coming from her boss! Just because the victim does not respond, does not make it any less of an assault. Heck, it wouldn't even work in a court of law. And I AM blaming Rads for seeing this differently
That is fine. But why's she getting into her boss' life in the first place? Like lecturing him about how a person's reactions to sweets tell one about his personality? I do agree that Arjun was rude in rolling up her submission paper and using it to wrap whatever (I'm forgetting the name of the item) If he didn't like her submission, he should have just stated so and moved on.
Also, I hate to break it to you, but having worked both in India and the US, US sexual harassment laws are non-existent in India. Or as the Brits would like to put it, they exist more in the breach than in the observed.
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Arjun's intent - He is going after Sam to destroy her. Makes him even worse than Saral. Makes him a psycho as opposed to Saral who is your garden variety jerk in sore need of a talking-to.
Granted. I never stated anything otherwise. I just stated that Radhika has brought a lot of what she has upon herself by taking things into her own hands.
Originally posted by: AnuMP
Diff between Saral and Arjun is that the latter is a handsome hunk who is presented with pleasing BGM and romantic lighting. The heroine accepts it, the audience laps it up and the CVs go on happily.
The CVs are pretty idiotic, but I thought you were talking about Arjun and why he is being supported wrt his 'romance' w/ Radz, given his violent behavior w/ her. Point I was making was that all of it wasn't his own doing. I do agree that calling their relationship 'romantic' is inane.