Characters...

Well, hello friends..honestly, there is a lot of chit chat about how the characters have radically changed...but in my opinion, they haven't really changed, but different dimensions of their character are being explored...Lets see..

The description is nice specially that Colgate model line just crack me.

dnt try 2 make rad as some super women

^^perhaps you could refrain from telling people what they can and what they can't write...you can disagree, point out the inconsistencies and ask questions but sentences like 'don't write/potray/do this' sound like an order...and this is the second time I am seeing you do this.

Originally posted by: shravanfan

The description is nice specially that Colgate model line just crack me.

Originally posted by: LOLitaPawar

^^perhaps you could refrain from telling people what they can and what they can't write...you can disagree, point out the inconsistencies and ask questions but sentences like 'don't write/potray/do this' sound like an order...and this is the second time I am seeing you do this.

Originally posted by: muktha_cute

dnt try 2 make rad as some super women

she cant handle her own relations properly,nor can get job on her own,cant even get a house on her own,cant handle her personal or professional life without others help

who cant even handle her own life will help sam

stupidest theory i ever heard

khud ka toh kuch nahi kar sakti but ati hain dusro ki life hell banane on d name of helping them

Originally posted by: muktha_cute

i dnt need ur permission to write what i want to write,if u hv problm wid my posts thn instead of advicing me just press the report button.whn did i said to any member to not to write or potray or do this or do that.if u cant understand my post its not my problem.what i said isdnt try 2 make rad as some super women

how r u so sure that i said this to TM i was saying abt cvs just think how can a TM can make a character,cvs make the character so im saying tto cvs that dont try 2 make rad as super women bcz they r d writers and do writing stuff for d story n characters

so as ppl cant understand my posts now i cant explain each and every post of mine

even if we think for 1sec that it is to TM where did i ask TM not to write or not to potray not to this or do that

1) if you were trying to say that the writers shouldn't make radhika a superwoman then you should have begun your sentence like that.Don't you think the way you wrote it, it is natural to assume that you were talking to the tm? Of course I can't tell you how to begin your sentence,being clear while trying to say what you want to is in your hands.
2) fine, you didn't use the words potray or say or do but you did use the word make...it is synonymous to the word potray(at least in this context).
3) take a chill pill.

Originally posted by: libran90

Chill dear.. Its just my POV, not any theory. And I am not interested in portraying Radhika as a superwoman, because she isn't..what I am trying to say, is that every person is lacking somewhere as far as characterization goes..If Sam is street-smart, then emotion is not her strength, she is fragile in that dept.If Radhika is not street smart and rone-dhone wali public, then emotions are her strength, because that is the way she thinks and deals with situations. If Neil is Mr. Good Boy, he is also Mr. Emotional and Arjun, he is at present Mr. Badboy, there is no other shade other than that being shown..Every character is imperfect...like did we expect Radhika to be so strong before Arjun?did we expect Samaira to become so enchanted by Arjun? Did we expect Neil to become Devdas? And why is there no other shade to Arjun...