Time for Sid to put Marriage Nishanis back on Ridz - Page 2

Originally posted by: sanakhanna

am nt bashing any character bt its nt necessary for every woman to wear trademarks of marriage to show she is married. even there r sum cultures in india where these things r of no importance i.e. mangalsutra n sindur r nt part of rites n traditions during wedding

Originally posted by: coolpc

Once armaan knows the truth about Sid-Riddhima marriage, Sid should put back all the marriage nishaanis back on Riddhima. Its ridicules that how cvs are showing a married women without any marriage symbols on her. Riddhima wants that her husband should be on her side and by putting mangalsutra & sindoor back on her, sid will take first step towards assuring Ridz that he is with his wife.I agree, it is plain stupid, that Riddhima is roaming around without wearing her wedding Nishaanis

Looking at the precap I feel really bad for Riddhima. The girl isin pain becuz her husband is letting her go.. becuz her husband is notgiving her the right to reveal that she belongs to him. Sid should shout saying Riddhima is his wife. Some may say that Sid is being self sacrificing, however I fail to agree, he is being a coward. If he really respects Riddhimas position as his wife, then he needs to start playing the role of a husband, and buckle down and say 'I am married to Riddhima Armaan, don't come near her'. Only then will he fulfil playing the role of a HUSBAND.

I want to see Riddhima with her mangalsutra and sindoor. Also it'll prevent some people from crossing their limits and harassing someone else's wife which is very much needed. Harassing is a STRONG word. I don't think Armaan is harassing her, he has no clue that she is married, he has that much decency that if he knew that Riddhima was married, he would not pull her 'alone' and 'harass' her in the FE

Originally posted by: nisha80

I think Ridz was da one who remved them first..she shld go and ask Sid to tie her mangalsutra again..and put sindooor

after mangalsutra and sindoor are so imp for a married woman 😳

Originally posted by: nisha80

I think Ridz was da one who remved them first..she shld go and ask Sid to tie her mangalsutra again..and put sindooor

after mangalsutra and sindoor are so imp for a married woman 😳

Originally posted by: VampirePrincess

I so very well remember the first scene wen Amy n ridz met..in pune
ridz was there to meet sid, but at the time she had only her ring on.

as far as i remember yuvna came into the track much later...she cudnt face amy with all those signs on..thts the only explanation.

CV's seem to be stretching the whole thing..amy needs to knw she's married bcoz as an amy fan i knw...he wudnt(in ur terms) "harass" a married girl 😆