@Libs, you have raised a logical point. Want to remind the makers, since it seems that it has elapsed from their memory, with changing times and growing awareness there is a demand from the media to air shows based on progressive concepts. Slavery days and colonial policies are thing of the past. It is unacceptable, notwithstanding the valid reason, to be dismissed as invalid for getting into physical relationship outside marriage. In Indian context, marriage is considered a sacred institution, hence getting physically intimate outside the purview of marriage, is not only an infidelity but also a crime,.
The objectionable idea might have been justified had it been a periodic show or based on illiterate family with rural backdrop. The flip side is, they are showing a prosperous family with urban background, where high class maturity level of the Grihapati is depicted with his statement; when he wants the siblings to settle their own disputes without elders interference. It's appaling, when in such type of top class family the makers are showing a filthy concept of getting an heir through another woman.
Want to know whether there was dearth in creativity, that the makers needed to incorporate the detestable track. They must have felt, people at large have interest in basic instinct, hence the beautiful role of Teni won't get the highlight or impotance if she is not put in bed with handsome Parth.
Cvs please understand we viewers would get more attached and attracted with a show which gives prominence to feelings and ideas which are relevant and have logical explanations.
They casted excellent leads, which was heartening. Sid is mature and informative, being his fan expected from him to raise his voice against the aforesaid idea. If he could have asserted the makers might have adhered to his call.
Edited by snowflakes2119 - 8 years ago
Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin
