TB:Life OK's DSDSB to take a seven year leap - Page 10

Leap is not needed and only logic behind leap was if they wanted to get the focus back on Viraj because after meeting his end there was no scope for him in the story ... but if KB is really not happy with leap and thats not publicity stunt then I just don't get what's the point in leap? Actor not happy for whom leap is taken, fans not happy, so much story and character exploration still left then what is the need of leap? Whether any one likes him or not fact is there is so much still not cleared about Raghav and his past ... how sia moves into new life and emotions she goes through still remains to be seen (and human emotions if handled well sell like hot cakes) I have never said V is not important to this story, he is and he won't take defeat laying down either ... what he does is another aspect yet to be explored ... see no point in leap ... because lets face it you try a stroy line it fails you can change and make it work ... you take a leap there is no coming back

They didn't need a leap to focus on Viraj. They very well could've done that without a leap.

I'm not getting this one either by Soaps1 either. Even if the purpose was to bring focus back on Viraj, how would a leap do it, as opposed to a continued storyline? And how would it be different from what they've been doing all these months?

In short there is no need for a leap ... its true they could make V run away and be in focus but they probably were thinking about punishing him in jail for 7 years and then working towards redemption in that case they would need a leap to convince people that redemption is justified now ... but a positive V won't work in my opinion for a number of reasons because of the way they have sketched the char (won't go into that debate here because the topic is if a leap is needed or not and not if positive v can work or not) because otherwise there is simply no reason for a leap yet!!! And its possible may be KB realizes that too and hence the differences (if there are any) because even though Viraj is a negative character it is very strong if it turns positive sia still won't go back to him (because of all that he has done to her and her being in love with Raghav) and the character will never be as strong as it is now this is a fact, it will be just another positive character

They could've shown him and focused on him in jail. Now you can say there would have to be a leap anyway if he were going to be in jail and serve his full punishment. But there are always ways around that.

And vrish u can call me just soaps or nadia ... yes you don't like me and i have my difference too but that does not mean you have to address me writing Soaps1 😊

Originally posted by: likarsh

They could've shown him and focused on him in jail. Now you can say there would have to be a leap anyway if he were going to be in jail and serve his full punishment. But there are always ways around that.

lik i know being a HC fan you take everything i say with a lot of bias, fair enough and i don't mind but think about it how many jail scenes could they show logically? They could show what he thinks, what he is upto but for how long? And that won't be him in focus that would be more like fillers

Originally posted by: Soaps1

lik i know being a HC fan you take everything i say with a lot of bias, fair enough and i don't mind but think about it how many jail scenes could they show logically? They could show what he thinks, what he is upto but for how long? And that won't be him in focus that would be more like fillers

Originally posted by: Soaps1

And vrish u can call me just soaps or nadia ... yes you don't like me and i have my difference too but that does not mean you have to address me writing Soaps1 😊

God! I think I'll quit following this show once that happens!