Posted:
Frnds sometimes i really feel D& V are both cant prove dem as good rulers, now u will say why? just think For Veer: 1.A king never takes decisions wid following his hert only.
2.He knws his bro. well so how can he tell dat dh. killed Saakshi.
3.though sounds bad, he takes decisions following his hert but not capable of understanding a loving person's hert(shera)
he belives wat he sees
4. emotionally v, weak can trust anybody in a fraction of a sec.
5. A king shld love his subjects but not so much so dat he cant see dere flaws(Reg: yatra episode wen labourssaid something abt dh. infront of Sia he didnt ask wat happened)
6.where dere answer is needed he cant say anything only screams on sh.
For Dharam:
1. v much influenced by people surrounding him pehle veer & noe Sia
doesnt use his brains at all (d weakness which guruji told still remains)
2.belives everybody,,, a king shld always keep his eyes & ears open & have a sixth sense
3. not responsible at all (Reg: doesnt confirm frm Sia dat whether her parents have ret.or not)
4. v much emotionally dependent pehle veer & now sia
i thnk jai can prove to b a good ruler he is evil type but keeps all info abt his subjects at lest. isiliye shera ko oose apne saath rakhne chahiye to thrash him wen needed pehle bhi woh karr chuki hai!!!(while ret. money)coz she has got a soft hert also!!!
wat say???
CID
