Debate: PRCains v/s Veerains -CLOSED - Page 9

Originally posted by: generator

prathvi raj chuhan ki koi kamjori nahi hai........

prathivi raj chuhan ko na kabhi gussa aata hai na hi ek pal me kisi bare rai nAHI banata hai.vo dusmano ki chalo ko palat kar un par vaar karta....

uski kamjoori ke bare me sabse pehle use pata chalta.bazar walo ko nhai pata chalta..........

vo apni kamjoori ko thoond kar use apni takat bana leta hai..........

par poor veer asbko even sagars ko uski kamjori ke bare me pata.....

guuuuuuuuussssssssssssssssaaaaaaaaaaa......

have rabba guse me bhimsen ko pakne chala gay....gusse me dharam ko bacha liya.gusse me shera ko drop kar diya.......gusse me chori kar li....gusee me sia ke khilaf jab shramik bola ko sun liya........

bhagwan is ladke ka kya hoga......

guuse me kahin devdas na ban jaye.........

kyonki gussa insaan ki sabbse badi kam joori hai.vo use andha bana deta hai........

and i can bet agar prc hota to agni aur jv ka raaz vo khud kholta.na ki charu sinha.........

Originally posted by: thornewood9

Point 1: PRC doesnt get angry doesnt fail doesnt complain Realises his weakness and makes it his Strength.
Prithvi used to get angry at Nandini a lot. Her naivety annoyed him and the situations she got herself into annoyed him too. In anger he would shout at her and tell her off. In the Yatra when they first met he used to get angry with her all the time. When she burnt his papers he slapped her. Prithvis weakness is similar to Veers in that he can be arrogant and does sometime get angry. and also..veer is stubborn as well as arrogant...and wen rajat plays the role....of being stubborn his face expressions.....make it look even more serious then it has to be.

Point 2: Veers weakness is his anger.
This is true but throughout the drama he has slowly slowly learnt to control it. An excellent example was when Karan was insulting him and instead of fighting him Veer just ignored him and the Guruji was very happy with Veers progress. another exapmle is....veer controlled his anger for infront of shera too...wen recently shera came to him then instead of shouting at her he talked to her...like some starnger...

Point 3: In anger he went after Bhimsen
Yes because Veer is impulsive and Bhimsen was threatening his family the Aryavarths and Veer cannot allow anyone to hurt his family. His Responsibility and Duty is to his family and ensuring their safety so Veers anger may have been wrong but completely justified and a human realistic reaction.

Point 4: In anger he saved Dharam. Actually he saved Dharam because Nivriti told him to. Veer was going to give up remember? But Nivriti came and gave him strength. And of course Veer was angry. He was angry on Dharams behalf, here Dharam is being falsely accused! He is being falsely sentenced and now they are going to hang him Veer loves Dharam and his Duty lies in protecting and serving Dharam so it was Veers Duty to save Dharam. His anger was justified for the situation. Anyone in the same situation would feel anger over such injustice. In prc prithvi harldy had time for his family expcially after his father died..he had to look agfter the whole of ajmer...but here veer will go to any extent to look after his family and his dear ones...even if it means to go against the Aryangar rules and break them!!!

Point 5: In anger he stole
Veer wasn't angry when he stole the money. He was cornered and desperate. He felt trapped and decided there was no way out except through stealing. And when Veer made this decision he was hating himself and hating what he was doing and feeling anguished because he could see no other way out. Veer would never purposely hurt Dharam ever whether he is angry or not. Veer can be angry with Dharam but he would never hurt him. There are many examples of this. When Veer decided to fight Dharam for the Throne he was angry with Dharam but did nothing to hurt him instead he refused to speak to him and stayed out of his way but both were hurting along with being angry.

Point 6: In anger he spoke against Sia.
Again he was not angry more shocked at what she was saying and if he was angry that would have been justified too. Sia was being incredibly cruel and mean and Veer could not believe that she would ever think in such a way. Also Veer did not hear what the Shramik actually said. All he heard was Sia telling them off in a harsh manner and he told her that Everyone has the freedom to their own opinion. Which is true. The shramiks had a crappy opinion and were being nasty but they do have the right to their opinion.

Point 7: In anger he left Shera.
Yes because he felt betrayed and hurt and shocked and deceived. His anger was justified because it did look bad for Shera and Shera had betrayed him. He had loved her and now with her deception it looked like she had used him to get only money and had never cared for him at all. Is anger not justified and a completely realistic reaction in this situation? Yes it is. Sanyogita was angry with PRC when she thought he had betrayed her for the Throne. Veer is in the same situation here.

And for Rajat to portray such anger so wonderfully shows once again that he is up to the role of Veer and this role is indeed better suited for him. Also the Role of PRC was was a challenge for Rajat expecially at a young age....but in dharamveer rajat improved alot...and now the little star has million s and millions fo fans following behind him

Aisha xxx😉

Originally posted by: rajatnmughda4ev

What is this? Maidan se sab PRCians bhaag gaye kya????

Dharti ke Veer yodha ke supporters kahaan hain?

Way to go Veer team!!!!

We rock!!!!! WOHOOO!!!👏

(Sorry, a bit hyper, just had a bowl full of raspberries....)

Originally posted by: thornewood9

Rasberries mein sugar hota hain kya?😆 lol yha sugar tho bohot hoti hai... isili yeh tho yeh bilkul hypa hogai hai
Mujhe bhi yehee lagtah hain😉 Saab bhaag gaye!
PRCians buraa maat manana!😳 Love you guys really!
Lekin kya mein yahan akele MahaYudh laar rahee hoon?😆

Aisha xxx😉

Originally posted by: heaven princess

Originally posted by: heaven princess