\|/ DKDM Episode Discussion Thread \|/

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#311

😊loved lohitang in today's episode,the way he kicked devraj indra and hold him reminded me of jallandhar lifting-up indra by holding his neck😃.anyways,pushpadant saved poor indra.[their plan flopped].😛

Quote

sucheta

@kaatayani

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#312

Seriously Indra..!!

Anyways Kali is to come..and i am super nervous.. i dont want another facade of Adishakti ki leela and I definitely don't want Lohitaang and Shankhachud being chastised by Parvati in the end..

Hope tht Mahadev for this last time gets to do something other than standing behind Parvati

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

sucheta

@kaatayani

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#313

Prithvi devi presented such a sorry picture... the lady playing Prithvi is really expressive and a good actress..

if at all i will remember this track then it will be fr Lohitaang Prithvi and Lohitaang Pipalad scenes

Quote

Arijit

@Arijit007

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#314

true, she is a good actress.

Quote

rsnarula67

@rsnarula67

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#315

Dicey Indra was always sneaky, but sneaky assasination attempt ... too much even from Indra ... and Puspadant as ADC - unbelievable😆

Prithvi Devi - yes, she was good.

The end of this track is in sight, thank you ye powers that be, I don't know how much more of MR as Lohithang I can take 🤢

SRJ will be back in today's epi😊 Me happy.

Quote

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#316

Originally posted by: rsnarula67
Aakash, My interpretation,
Vishnu is the Palanhar - maintainer sustainer, for which Wealth is a requirement - so Lakshmi is his consort.

The symbolism of showing Lakshmi at Vishnu's feet serving him, is in my op (As always, a caveat, this is entirely my op), to show us that Wealth has to serve us and that we should not serve Wealth. It has nothing to do with equality of the genders.

Most iconography is symbolic - and I guess each one interprets it differently

=====

@aparupanath : I still don't get the legs thing ... it boggles the mind😆

😲oh i totally missed the convo...the U-shape confused me,but actually its his feet.actually,we have metallic-idols of lakshmi narayan,in which narayan has the shricharan mark on his forehead.we worship all the gods and goddesses.😊but i also feel that shaivism gives more equality to the female-energy than vaishnavism.😲

Quote

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#317

Originally posted by: Quixotic5

Excuse me ??.. disrespect ??.. so if i am not that fond of Vaishnavism & present my reasons , i am disrespecting it ??..

Anyways, this is not a healthy debate & so it shouldnt be continued..

😲actually,i also share the same thoughts with aakash regarding this.i like goddess lakshmi very much,so it initially disturbed me a lot.then in the purana and other scripture i found that,it is her way of showing her affection towards the lord.another sripture said that,as lakshmi's beauty is like that of the morning sun and a single glance at her brings goodluck,prosperity and happiness,so vishnu prefers her to be sitted on the other side of his head so that he can get a clear view of her as soon as he opens his eyes.😊it cannot be denied that lakshmi resides in his heart.vishnu has a mole called srivatsa mark on his chest depicting lakshmi,where the vaishnavs applies chandan.in the purana ,it is said that shakti is the one who is the left-part of shiva's body,saraswati is in the tongue of brahma and lakshmi is the heart of narayan.😊.he is called srinivasa[the one in whose heart,lakshmi resides] and lakshmi is called Hari-hridivilaasini[the one who sports in vishnu's heart].😊.but the unfortunate fact is that unlike shaivism,the current vaishnavs,especially the iskcon people are unable to present the relation between the lord and lakshmi properly.😲they focus more on the bhakt-bhagvaan relation,and present lakshmi as a server.

Quote

rsnarula67

@rsnarula67

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#318

@aparupanath Surya is an expert - his explanation for the tilak was quite good. And his explanation would not have come about without your confusion - so kabhi kabhi confuse hona bhi acchha hota hain. Tumhare confusion se, discussion shuru hua, aur humein bhi kuch knowledge mila😊

Quote

983175

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#319

@ Aparupa

I am really impressed.. i like the way u have analyzed everything.. it also boggles my mind since it got me confused about ur age (not that it matters ..age is just another number)..its just that i used to think of u as a fun-loving innocent teenage girl but it seems there is more to it than that.. u are also quite knowledgeable & intellectual in ur own way..ur views had me convinced about the beauty of Vaishnavism since it was an honest view unlike the self proclaimed intellectuals who just completely ignore the negatives & jump to defend anything that they hold in high esteem whilst completely ignoring the reality of the predicament..