Are they going to show entire Ramayan?

I had this question, because so many articles are coming out about the new actors for Ramayan in Dkdm. What need is there for characters such as Sunaina and Janak, unless they are going to show Ramayan from Baal Kand? 😕😲

I don't think so. As it is there are umpty number of Ramayan-based shows. No one wants the whole Ramayan again!

i think they are gonna show the ramyan track from the swayamvar and ayoddhyaa kaand.

Showing the Ramayan track is fine, but I don't want to see the entire Ramayan from scratch. We have enough shows based on that epic! 🤔 I just want to see the scenes that involve Mahadev or Ravan, such as Ravan trying to lift Shiv Dhanush in Sita's Swayamvar, Mahadev being born as Hanuman, etc.

I had the same question as you - seeing all these articles, was wondering why are they showing parts of the Ramayan irrelevant to Shiva. Although it's Shiva's bow that is broken in the swayamvara, but other than that, the only time Mahadev is relevant at all is during the establishment of the Rameshwaram Jyotirlinga. Otherwise, showing it all is pretty irrelevant.

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

I had the same question as you - seeing all these articles, was wondering why are they showing parts of the Ramayan irrelevant to Shiva. Although it's Shiva's bow that is broken in the swayamvara, but other than that, the only time Mahadev is relevant at all is during the establishment of the Rameshwaram Jyotirlinga. Otherwise, showing it all is pretty irrelevant.

And Sangeeta Karpure - Sumitra in AS Ramayan - is gonna be Manthara here? Hai Ram, er Lakshman, er Sumitra 🤢

They are going to show entire ramayan from their own twisted point of view. They will show mahadev rescuing humanity and the need for ramavatar very superficial .

I was also thinking the same.. that what they are gonna show..
Same Doubt.. 😳

actual shiva and shakti related stories like andhakasur , shumv-nishumv , kanya kumari , minaxi-sundareswar , annapoorna , sund-upsund , fake parvati and several shiv-parvati short stories r completely omited , mahishasur , durgamasur were twisted and distorted like hell
and they are inventing stories and dragging mahadev where he had nothing to do..m damn sure hanuman is mohit that will be worst illogica thing coz though mahadev's avtar but hanuman came from mother's womb he has to get different face otherwise in the same logic vishnu's all avatar as parsuraam and raam should have been played by saurabh in spite of taking birth from mother's womb and in the very same logic sati and parvati should have been same actress as adi shakti's form (lol phir to koi prb hi nhi hota😆) so in which logic shakti and vishnu's avtar who are taking birth from mother's womb having different face but mahadev's avtar taking birth from mother's womb having same face as mahadev??
ridiculous

not to forget another worst thin they are doing making kartikeya getting married to an apsara as they have shown devsena a apsara of indra's court its highly disrespectful step devsena is a goddess she is vishnu's daughter and indra's foster daughter they are saying in mahabharata devsena is apsara ..i read mahabharata i never found such a thing i won't watch such a track