Posted:
[This is not a comparison post-its just a general observational post and has NOTHING to do with any actor, its in relation to the story line]
Its something i question my self and infact everyone over here..
how come we are noticing certian follies in the script character representation etc only NOW in the Parvati phase when the truth is that these follies existed since the show began!
for eg:-we find the Nandi dying part crazy
Parvatis Nani Ma anoying
find the idea of Parvatis sangeet bizaare
Mainas character irritating and OTT
but for a fact we all forget that these creative liberties(as you can call it😆) were taken since the begining of the show
for eg:-Tarkasur NEVER existed in Satis time
the Stabhish track also was a concoted one
Sati being constantly attacked left right and center by the Asurs(which i admit shouldnt have been done so often to make her look like a damsel in distress)
the fictional sister Vijaya(OMG-i just hated her)
i guess youll are getting my point😛
The show despite being awesum-has always had its faults in terms of how much masala they put in it,or for the fact that the show sometimes went over the line in terms of certain plots and character representation
and still i find many of us noticing these discrepecies only now😆-including for a fact myself
what do you think is the reason?
is it that perhaps since the Parvati phase has more matter and the story is well known that we expect a bit more...?
i often find our selfs getting a bit more touchy about ceratin things NOW,which is a bit strange considering that such small faults always existed in the show(which is maybe one of the primary reasons why the show is doing well in the first place-cos of the different representation of an old story)
just my POV,beacuse ive noticed this sudden
change in me myself...
its like a I go-"arggghhh!!!how can they do this?"😡 and then my other part of my brain tells me-"but darling this has always happened!"😆
shruti
Anupamaa
