Devon Ke Dev Mahadev Written Update 18/05/2012 ~Daksha Beheaded~ - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

9.4k

Users

14

Likes

90

Frequent Posters

shali thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#11
@bewafa...
Sri Hari is another name for Vishnu...
bewafa thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: shali

@bewafa...

Sri Hari is another name for Vishnu...


Aaahhh...thanks for that! So, the pain of separation is in this aspect...Ram was Vishnu's avatar...and he lost Sita.

Btw, I have another question...Vishnu bound Veerbhadra...how did Bhadrakali help Veerbhadra escape? Since he couldn't do it by himself due to respect for Vishnu? Is it because, technically, Bhadrakali broke free?
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: bewafa


Aaahhh...thanks for that! So, the pain of separation is in this aspect...Ram was Vishnu's avatar...and he lost Sita.

Btw, I have another question...Vishnu bound Veerbhadra...how did Bhadrakali help Veerbhadra escape? Since he couldn't do it by himself due to respect for Vishnu? Is it because, technically, Bhadrakali broke free?


Here they showed Bhadrakali becoming a fireball and releasing him.

In reality, Vishnu was Daksha's last line of defense, and Bhadrakali's role was much greater than that. Essentially, Virbhadra and Bhadrakali attacked the yagna (Nandi and the Ganas had been defeated earlier) and killed several devas. As another poster pointed out yesterday, Saraswati's nose was cut off, Bhrigu's beard was torn, Vayu's teeth were knocked off and Vishnu himself was knocked unconscious by Veerbhadra. Following that, Daksha was killed.

So Veerbhadra and Bhadrakali played a much bigger role than what they showed.
bewafa thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: .Vrish.


Here they showed Bhadrakali becoming a fireball and releasing him.

In reality, Vishnu was Daksha's last line of defense, and Bhadrakali's role was much greater than that. Essentially, Virbhadra and Bhadrakali attacked the yagna (Nandi and the Ganas had been defeated earlier) and killed several devas. As another poster pointed out yesterday, Saraswati's nose was cut off, Bhrigu's beard was torn, Vayu's teeth were knocked off and Vishnu himself was knocked unconscious by Veerbhadra. Following that, Daksha was killed.

So Veerbhadra and Bhadrakali played a much bigger role than what they showed.


Aaahhh...makes sense.

I don't understand why they don't show what happened...it would take up more episodes and isn't that good? LoL
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#15
Much of that story is not well known, and what was probably feared was showing a battle b/w Vishnu & Shiva would risk bruising the sentiments of followers of either: no Vaishnav would want to accept that Vishnu once got trounced by Virbhadra. They probably omitted that scene to avoid any public controversy.

Honestly, I don't see why they should have not shown it. The scriptures have Vishnu losing to Virbhadra in this case, and they also have Shiva losing a battle to Krishna over a demon named Banasura. Neither of these events establish any superiority of Vishnu over Shiva, or vice versa, but some people are unable to accept that at all. So such a thing was probably going to be a non-starter here.
Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago
vanadhi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#16
nice written update sia , thank you sio much.. ur pictures are good ...welcome back ,we missed u
bewafa thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Much of that story is not well known, and what was probably feared was showing a battle b/w Vishnu & Shiva would risk bruising the sentiments of followers of either: no Vaishnav would want to accept that Vishnu once got trounced by Virbhadra. They probably omitted that scene to avoid any public controversy.


Honestly, I don't see why they should have not shown it. The scriptures have Vishnu losing to Virbhadra in this case, and they also have Shiva losing a battle to Krishna over a demon named Banasura. Neither of these events establish any superiority of Vishnu over Shiva, or vice versa, but some people are unable to accept that at all. So such a thing was probably going to be a non-starter here.


You're right...some people in India are a bit weird, and there would have been protests and a controversy. I guess the makers didn't want negative publicity for their religious show.

Oh wow, so Shiv has lost to Krishna. I didn't even know they ever came into contact with each other. But, if it was over a demon...does that mean that Shiv was on the demon's side? As 'good' always wins?

ALSO, another question, which I hope you can answer is this: Vishnu said to Daksh that it was his duty to protect him, but not his duty to protect his life.
What does this mean?

This forum is teaching me so much 😆
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#18
Vishnu's statement to Daksh here had no meaning - just one of those meaningless one liners that serials put out.

In the case of Shiva vs Krishna, neither of them were exactly in the wrong. Krishna's grandson had eloped w/ Banasura's daughter, and Banasura imprisoned him. Krishna set out to free him, and Shiva, due to his promise to Banasura, defended him, but got defeated by Krishna. This event ended happily w/ Shiva persuading Banasura to release Anirudha & Usha, and the only thing Banasura lost was his 1000 arms, and left w/ just 2 like everyone else.
bewafa thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Vishnu's statement to Daksh here had no meaning - just one of those meaningless one liners that serials put out.


In the case of Shiva vs Krishna, neither of them were exactly in the wrong. Krishna's grandson had eloped w/ Banasura's daughter, and Banasura imprisoned him. Krishna set out to free him, and Shiva, due to his promise to Banasura, defended him, but got defeated by Krishna. This event ended happily w/ Shiva persuading Banasura to release Anirudha & Usha, and the only thing Banasura lost was his 1000 arms, and left w/ just 2 like everyone else.


Damn serials for confusing me! 😆

Oh ok, that makes sense. Very similar to Vishnu and Daksh. But why did Shiv agree to protect a demon? This is so interesting. There are so many stories, that makers don't really need to use their own brains for plot lines
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#20
Note that not all demons were evil, and not all demigods were good. Banasura was a good demon - and w/ his 1000 arms, he used to play different instruments and sing praises of Shiva. That's why Shiva promised to protect him. But Banasura was already too powerful w/ his 1000 arms, and got bored and once complained to Shiva, for which Shiva cursed him that one equal to Shiva would defeat Banasura and curb his pride. That's what happened.

I think we are digressing a lot from the serial, so I suggest that any further questions, please post them in the \|/ : Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva : \|/ thread of this forum, which exists for this very purpose.
Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".