Devon Ke Dev Mahadev Written Update 18/05/2012 ~Daksha Beheaded~

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

shanta

@shali

Sparkler

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

@bewafa...

Sri Hari is another name for Vishnu...

Quote

bewafa

@bewafa

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: shali
@bewafa...
Sri Hari is another name for Vishnu...

Aaahhh...thanks for that! So, the pain of separation is in this aspect...Ram was Vishnu's avatar...and he lost Sita.

Btw, I have another question...Vishnu bound Veerbhadra...how did Bhadrakali help Veerbhadra escape? Since he couldn't do it by himself due to respect for Vishnu? Is it because, technically, Bhadrakali broke free?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: bewafa

Aaahhh...thanks for that! So, the pain of separation is in this aspect...Ram was Vishnu's avatar...and he lost Sita.

Btw, I have another question...Vishnu bound Veerbhadra...how did Bhadrakali help Veerbhadra escape? Since he couldn't do it by himself due to respect for Vishnu? Is it because, technically, Bhadrakali broke free?

Here they showed Bhadrakali becoming a fireball and releasing him.

In reality, Vishnu was Daksha's last line of defense, and Bhadrakali's role was much greater than that. Essentially, Virbhadra and Bhadrakali attacked the yagna (Nandi and the Ganas had been defeated earlier) and killed several devas. As another poster pointed out yesterday, Saraswati's nose was cut off, Bhrigu's beard was torn, Vayu's teeth were knocked off and Vishnu himself was knocked unconscious by Veerbhadra. Following that, Daksha was killed.

So Veerbhadra and Bhadrakali played a much bigger role than what they showed.

Quote

bewafa

@bewafa

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Here they showed Bhadrakali becoming a fireball and releasing him.

In reality, Vishnu was Daksha's last line of defense, and Bhadrakali's role was much greater than that. Essentially, Virbhadra and Bhadrakali attacked the yagna (Nandi and the Ganas had been defeated earlier) and killed several devas. As another poster pointed out yesterday, Saraswati's nose was cut off, Bhrigu's beard was torn, Vayu's teeth were knocked off and Vishnu himself was knocked unconscious by Veerbhadra. Following that, Daksha was killed.

So Veerbhadra and Bhadrakali played a much bigger role than what they showed.

Aaahhh...makes sense.

I don't understand why they don't show what happened...it would take up more episodes and isn't that good? LoL

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

Much of that story is not well known, and what was probably feared was showing a battle b/w Vishnu & Shiva would risk bruising the sentiments of followers of either: no Vaishnav would want to accept that Vishnu once got trounced by Virbhadra. They probably omitted that scene to avoid any public controversy.

Honestly, I don't see why they should have not shown it. The scriptures have Vishnu losing to Virbhadra in this case, and they also have Shiva losing a battle to Krishna over a demon named Banasura. Neither of these events establish any superiority of Vishnu over Shiva, or vice versa, but some people are unable to accept that at all. So such a thing was probably going to be a non-starter here.

Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago

Quote

Vanadhirayarservai

@vanadhi

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

nice written update sia , thank you sio much.. ur pictures are good ...welcome back ,we missed u

Quote

bewafa

@bewafa

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: .Vrish.
Much of that story is not well known, and what was probably feared was showing a battle b/w Vishnu & Shiva would risk bruising the sentiments of followers of either: no Vaishnav would want to accept that Vishnu once got trounced by Virbhadra. They probably omitted that scene to avoid any public controversy.

Honestly, I don't see why they should have not shown it. The scriptures have Vishnu losing to Virbhadra in this case, and they also have Shiva losing a battle to Krishna over a demon named Banasura. Neither of these events establish any superiority of Vishnu over Shiva, or vice versa, but some people are unable to accept that at all. So such a thing was probably going to be a non-starter here.

You're right...some people in India are a bit weird, and there would have been protests and a controversy. I guess the makers didn't want negative publicity for their religious show.

Oh wow, so Shiv has lost to Krishna. I didn't even know they ever came into contact with each other. But, if it was over a demon...does that mean that Shiv was on the demon's side? As 'good' always wins?

ALSO, another question, which I hope you can answer is this: Vishnu said to Daksh that it was his duty to protect him, but not his duty to protect his life.

What does this mean?

This forum is teaching me so much 😆

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

Vishnu's statement to Daksh here had no meaning - just one of those meaningless one liners that serials put out.

In the case of Shiva vs Krishna, neither of them were exactly in the wrong. Krishna's grandson had eloped w/ Banasura's daughter, and Banasura imprisoned him. Krishna set out to free him, and Shiva, due to his promise to Banasura, defended him, but got defeated by Krishna. This event ended happily w/ Shiva persuading Banasura to release Anirudha & Usha, and the only thing Banasura lost was his 1000 arms, and left w/ just 2 like everyone else.

Quote

bewafa

@bewafa

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: .Vrish.
Vishnu's statement to Daksh here had no meaning - just one of those meaningless one liners that serials put out.

In the case of Shiva vs Krishna, neither of them were exactly in the wrong. Krishna's grandson had eloped w/ Banasura's daughter, and Banasura imprisoned him. Krishna set out to free him, and Shiva, due to his promise to Banasura, defended him, but got defeated by Krishna. This event ended happily w/ Shiva persuading Banasura to release Anirudha & Usha, and the only thing Banasura lost was his 1000 arms, and left w/ just 2 like everyone else.

Damn serials for confusing me! 😆

Oh ok, that makes sense. Very similar to Vishnu and Daksh. But why did Shiv agree to protect a demon? This is so interesting. There are so many stories, that makers don't really need to use their own brains for plot lines

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#20

Note that not all demons were evil, and not all demigods were good. Banasura was a good demon - and w/ his 1000 arms, he used to play different instruments and sing praises of Shiva. That's why Shiva promised to protect him. But Banasura was already too powerful w/ his 1000 arms, and got bored and once complained to Shiva, for which Shiva cursed him that one equal to Shiva would defeat Banasura and curb his pride. That's what happened.

I think we are digressing a lot from the serial, so I suggest that any further questions, please post them in the \|/ : Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva : \|/ thread of this forum, which exists for this very purpose.

Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago

Quote

1 2 3

Devon Ke Dev Mahadev Written Update 18/05/2012 ~Daksha Beheaded~ - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics