Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 23rd Nov 2025 - WKV
IJJAT IN BIN 23.11
KIARA PREGNANT🤰 24.11
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 23, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 24th Nov 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Why does lead actor Ranveer look more like a side actor in Dhurandhar?
Teaser - Tu Meri Main Tera Main Tera Tu Meri
Why can't Ranveer file divorce from Deepika - does he deserve better?
Why can't Kangana get married? She is the most desirable woman
Deepika LIKED this video reel about her and Ranbir on Instagram 👀
GOATED Casting- Dhurandhar
Ranveer Singh and Shah Rukh Khan Global Peace Honours
Badhai ho badhai
Dharmendra Passes Away
Till they showed Ram's part, everything even their fiction tracks were going well. They have most of the time taken part of the real story, added their creatitive verson & given us. This controversial Ram's story is not in Valmiki Ramayan & in Shivpuran-Rudra Samhita it is added in betwwen othe stories which makes it look like it was not the part of the original story but was added later oni m v.sowie to say but its quit clearly writeen in valmiki ramayan bout this incident and even in shiv puran...coz this was the only way shivji was able to put sati away 4rm himself ..v.clearly its been writeen in both puran..i dotn know which ramayn you have read..but both consist tht part of raam ji n sati mata... There are many incidents of stories added later on in the original purans. This is one such story, which they have followe 90% as it is, where as other important stories were shown only partly.
The way it is shown is not convincing. It was actually Parvvati who had tested Ram. In Maa Shakti show they had shown Parvati testing Ram & Shivji was shown only telling Parvati see I told you not to tese him. That's it no the drama what they showed in the precap.
@payalibm,
This story is written in Tulsidas Ramacharitmanas but not in Valmiki Ramayan.
Nastya, showing Sati as human itself is wrong, she was divine. So shownig unconvincing story to show she is at fault is ok for a normal fiction show's character,the same becomes unaceptable when her Puran's story doesn't mention anythingof that sort. No wonder Devi Shakti gets angry & takes her ferrocious form. Even she must bethinking, how dare you show me in this manner😊What distresses me about this story most, is not a fact of testing itselfm of Shiv's denial of Sati. Ok, it has been heard, maybe as controversial addition to puranas... But the problem is in interpretation... I dislike all the contradiction between Aadi Shakti and manushya roop. How could it be trhat after showing her rudra roop she suddenly turns into naive Sati.
I can understand it in terms of leela - when God makes something as if ignorantly, but aiming at some unknown goal. Why Sati's realisation as Aadi Shakti has been limited only to form, but not the essence of character?
@Suruti, strangely Devi Puran doesn't even mention this neither Devi Bhagvat.Originally posted by: shruti.nil
@meenaxi-i suspect they have put this story perhaps to stretch the story a bit more?...as a pre drama to the Yagya-perhaps...i guess for story telling susposes-this story acts as a "Kahaani Main Twist"...im sure they are taking this track for this reason!
Using all caps is considered rude & shouting on net.YES ITS BEEN WRITTEN IN VALMIKI RAMAYAN,VERY CLEARLY ITS BEEN WRITTEN...RAAM CHRIT MANNAS ITS BEEN WRITEN BUT NOT WITH ANSWER TO WHY THIS HAPPENED...IF YOU READ VALMIKI RAMAYAN ITS BEEN WRITTEN WITH FULL MEANING OF WHY SATI JI TUK TEST OF RAAM JI AND REASON BEHIND IT AND Y SHIVJI LET ALL THIS HAPPENED...SWEETUUU IF YOU HAVE READ VALMIKI JI RAMAYAN THEN IN EVRYN SHLOKAA THEIR IS MEANING AND REASON BEHIND HAPENING AND ALL BEEN STATED CLEARLY 4RM WHERE THIS SITUATION IN RAMAYN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM N Y IT HAPNED WITH RAAM JI OR IN RAMAYAN...😊