Man ki Aankhen

shruti

@-Nymphadora-

Stunner

35

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

#21

The Sati testing Ram story is really strange...maybe as you said-it may have been added later...This story connects this incident with Dakshas Yagya..

why the Cvs choose this track is maybe to somehow justify why Sati and Shiv get separated etc...its a very controversial story actually because of the contradiction between whether it was Sati or Parvati...some people think this version is wrong some people think is isnt-its about interpretation

okey even that is forgiven...what about the potential time travel-thats a really weird take on the story-perhaps they are planning to show Ram meeting Parvati-Thats even stranger...

as Kal said ive read one story where Shiva after some years(1000+ actually) pities Satis condition and gives her discourses,after which the Yagya happens...but then somehow Sati feels she has hurt her husband and thinks that by going to Dakshas Yagya she can get things back to how they were,and Dakshas insults only instigate her further to give up her life,being already upset with what she did...by which she gives up all her past deeds which she shouldnt have done,and is born to wed Shiva again,this time much more wiser not to commit the same mistakes again!

we have to see how they put the story together...they are showing us unknown storys of Shiva-which is in a way good..but yes the interpretation of the story shouldn't be shoddy-and how they showed it yesterday time travel wasnt quite a convincing!

whats worse that all of this is shown to be happening within days from thier wedding?!doesn make sense!if they did show this story they could have shown much much later!

Edited by shruti.nil - 13 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

Payal

@payalibm

Rocker

27

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: mnx12
Till they showed Ram's part, everything even their fiction tracks were going well. They have most of the time taken part of the real story, added their creatitive verson & given us. This controversial Ram's story is not in Valmiki Ramayan & in Shivpuran-Rudra Samhita it is added in betwwen othe stories which makes it look like it was not the part of the original story but was added later oni m v.sowie to say but its quit clearly writeen in valmiki ramayan bout this incident and even in shiv puran...coz this was the only way shivji was able to put sati away 4rm himself ..v.clearly its been writeen in both puran..i dotn know which ramayn you have read..but both consist tht part of raam ji n sati mata... There are many incidents of stories added later on in the original purans. This is one such story, which they have followe 90% as it is, where as other important stories were shown only partly.
The way it is shown is not convincing. It was actually Parvvati who had tested Ram. In Maa Shakti show they had shown Parvati testing Ram & Shivji was shown only telling Parvati see I told you not to tese him. That's it no the drama what they showed in the precap.

Reply

Quote

akhl

@akhl

Dazzler

24

Posted: 13 years ago

#23

@payalibm,
This story is written in Tulsidas Ramacharitmanas but not in Valmiki Ramayan.

2

Reply

Quote

mnx12

@mnx12

Channel Moderator

35

+ 14

Posted: 13 years ago

#24

@payalibm, this story is part of Tulsidas Ramayan. Valmiki Ramayan starts with Shivji telling Ramayan's story to Parvati, clearly indicating Sati was not present at that time. Use simmilar size of fonts, we all are politely disussing this issuse.

Shivji-Sati's story is of Sat-yuga. Ram existed in the last quarter of Treta-yuga. Check the Yuga calculation thread in this forum to know about time difference.

Anything which is mentioned in Puranas which appears of contradictory time period & doubted by many can not be called authentic. Strangely Devi Bhagvat & Devi Puran, whom they are following the most doesn't even mention this story.

Reply

Quote

Payal

@payalibm

Rocker

27

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: akhl
@payalibm,
This story is written in Tulsidas Ramacharitmanas but not in Valmiki Ramayan.

YES ITS BEEN WRITTEN IN VALMIKI RAMAYAN,VERY CLEARLY ITS BEEN WRITTEN...RAAM CHRIT MANNAS ITS BEEN WRITEN BUT NOT WITH ANSWER TO WHY THIS HAPPENED...IF YOU READ VALMIKI RAMAYAN ITS BEEN WRITTEN WITH FULL MEANING OF WHY SATI JI TUK TEST OF RAAM JI AND REASON BEHIND IT AND Y SHIVJI LET ALL THIS HAPPENED...SWEETUUU IF YOU HAVE READ VALMIKI JI RAMAYAN THEN IN EVRYN SHLOKAA THEIR IS MEANING AND REASON BEHIND HAPENING AND ALL BEEN STATED CLEARLY 4RM WHERE THIS SITUATION IN RAMAYN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM N Y IT HAPNED WITH RAAM JI OR IN RAMAYAN...😊

yes!sowie u ppl felt i m being rude..sowe for tht

ummm its been writen in valmiki ramayan clearly...with reason and full source to find out y it happnede...in valmiki ramayan u will get to know all d reson behind hapening and doin..its v.intresting knowledge...n rahe baat time period kee here all this happened in time when their was god and ppl and when god full identity was yet not in picture...raamji n all came long ftr all this long long time ftr all this happend in btwn shivji and sati or parvatiji.this is the time of before vedic period...the time beyond before actual human were created...they say its time around some 10th century bc when the last veda was recognised rig veda...so dear tht time it was all translated into hindu language or indian language of wht happened by some major scholars ftr vedic period when life of woman changed and ramayan and mahabharta was written...but all this actually happend long bfr all this was written and translated...you will get part of originL valmiki ramayan in tht vaan of rajshtan where ranji stayed with sita ji 4 an year and then sita ji in valmiki ji ashram...there u will still ahve some parts of valmiki ramayan...their you will know all bout wht i said is true or not

Edited by payalibm - 13 years ago

Reply

Quote

shruti

@-Nymphadora-

Stunner

35

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

#26

@meenaxi-i suspect they have put this story perhaps to stretch the story a bit more?...as a pre drama to the Yagya-perhaps...i guess for story telling susposes-this story acts as a "Kahaani Main Twist"...im sure they are taking this track for this reason!

@payal please dont write in Caps,Caps give an impression that you are shouting,please dont do it!

Edited by shruti.nil - 13 years ago

Reply

Quote

mnx12

@mnx12

Channel Moderator

35

+ 14

Posted: 13 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: NST1983
What distresses me about this story most, is not a fact of testing itselfm of Shiv's denial of Sati. Ok, it has been heard, maybe as controversial addition to puranas... But the problem is in interpretation... I dislike all the contradiction between Aadi Shakti and manushya roop. How could it be trhat after showing her rudra roop she suddenly turns into naive Sati.
I can understand it in terms of leela - when God makes something as if ignorantly, but aiming at some unknown goal. Why Sati's realisation as Aadi Shakti has been limited only to form, but not the essence of character?

Nastya, showing Sati as human itself is wrong, she was divine. So shownig unconvincing story to show she is at fault is ok for a normal fiction show's character,the same becomes unaceptable when her Puran's story doesn't mention anythingof that sort. No wonder Devi Shakti gets angry & takes her ferrocious form. Even she must bethinking, how dare you show me in this manner😊

At one pt they say you have to awakenyour power from within. When it is awakened they don't recognise it. They are highly confused😆

3

Reply

Quote

mnx12

@mnx12

Channel Moderator

35

+ 14

Posted: 13 years ago

#28

YES ITS BEEN WRITTEN IN VALMIKI RAMAYAN,VERY CLEARLY ITS BEEN WRITTEN...RAAM CHRIT MANNAS ITS BEEN WRITEN BUT NOT WITH ANSWER TO WHY THIS HAPPENED...IF YOU READ VALMIKI RAMAYAN ITS BEEN WRITTEN WITH FULL MEANING OF WHY SATI JI TUK TEST OF RAAM JI AND REASON BEHIND IT AND Y SHIVJI LET ALL THIS HAPPENED...SWEETUUU IF YOU HAVE READ VALMIKI JI RAMAYAN THEN IN EVRYN SHLOKAA THEIR IS MEANING AND REASON BEHIND HAPENING AND ALL BEEN STATED CLEARLY 4RM WHERE THIS SITUATION IN RAMAYN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM N Y IT HAPNED WITH RAAM JI OR IN RAMAYAN...😊

Using all caps is considered rude & shouting on net.

Reply

Quote

mnx12

@mnx12

Channel Moderator

35

+ 14

Posted: 13 years ago

#29

Originally posted by: shruti.nil
@meenaxi-i suspect they have put this story perhaps to stretch the story a bit more?...as a pre drama to the Yagya-perhaps...i guess for story telling susposes-this story acts as a "Kahaani Main Twist"...im sure they are taking this track for this reason!

@Suruti, strangely Devi Puran doesn't even mention this neither Devi Bhagvat.

According to Devi Puran When Sati at the yagya gets angry at her Daksh, thinks I can finish every one here including the Devas in a second. But killing Daksh will be apitru hatya. She creats a Chaya-Sati fromher, tells her to destroy the yagya & she goes back to her Loka. Shivji carried this Chaya-Sati's body & roams in the world. When Vishnuji cuts her body with his discus. Shivjitells him at least I had Chaya-Sati with me, you couln't see even that, you too will be seperated froyour Chaya-patni. It is said that it was Sita's chaya which stayed with Ram. this clearly shows Sati had eneded much before Ram's birth. That's why they are showing it occuring mentally not in reality & have effects of a future events in present.

I know past events affects our present & future but seeing future & experiencing effects in present is absolutely new to me😆

2

Reply

Quote

Payal

@payalibm

Rocker

27

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: mnx12
YES ITS BEEN WRITTEN IN VALMIKI RAMAYAN,VERY CLEARLY ITS BEEN WRITTEN...RAAM CHRIT MANNAS ITS BEEN WRITEN BUT NOT WITH ANSWER TO WHY THIS HAPPENED...IF YOU READ VALMIKI RAMAYAN ITS BEEN WRITTEN WITH FULL MEANING OF WHY SATI JI TUK TEST OF RAAM JI AND REASON BEHIND IT AND Y SHIVJI LET ALL THIS HAPPENED...SWEETUUU IF YOU HAVE READ VALMIKI JI RAMAYAN THEN IN EVRYN SHLOKAA THEIR IS MEANING AND REASON BEHIND HAPENING AND ALL BEEN STATED CLEARLY 4RM WHERE THIS SITUATION IN RAMAYN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM N Y IT HAPNED WITH RAAM JI OR IN RAMAYAN...😊

Using all caps is considered rude & shouting on net.

i 4got dear been more then 4 yrs been on forum...was mostly on other thngs where cpaital was use to show signifcnt point,,,nn lolllzzz...habbit die hard...so m really sowie...i will try to rmbr next time bfr being in bold...sowie guyysss😳

2

Reply

Quote

Man ki Aankhen - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics