How should India handle Pakistan? - Page 15

Originally posted by: Noor_64

Someone said there are no Hindu terrorists in India..

a terrorist = a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities, a person who tries to frighten people or governments into doing what he/she wants by using or threatening violence (dictionary.com)

Can anyone honestly claim that there are NO Hindu's in India who fit this profile? 😕 Oh, puh-lease..that would make a good joke 😆 Do I really need to pull out examples? Aren't examples of these gunda and gangster types all over India (sadly)?

I guess you need to go through the post once again..Because no one said there are no Hindu terrorists...However its true that there are NO 'Hindu terrorist orgnanizations' whose ideology is simply to spread hinduism and kill everybody else who is a non-follower of Hinduism...I guess that's what is being said and I hope it helped you clear the confusion...

In any case this thread is not about that and I would love to know your views on the topic of this thread...😊

Originally posted by: Noor_64

Someone said there are no Hindu terrorists in India..

a terrorist = a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities, a person who tries to frighten people or governments into doing what he/she wants by using or threatening violence (dictionary.com)

Can anyone honestly claim that there are NO Hindu's in India who fit this profile? 😕 Oh, puh-lease..that would make a good joke 😆 Do I really need to pull out examples? Aren't examples of these gunda and gangster types all over India (sadly)?

dont mind, but by your logic, someone could then perhaps (sadly) conclude you have an empty head.😊

let's see. you have a head, some of it has empty space since there is so much space between all molecules. so should someone then say "empty head"? now would that be offensive, rude and wrong, or not really?😛

fyi, there is a difference between saying some gangster is a hindu, and saying that there is such an oxymoron as a hindu terrorist group. the right juxtaposition of words changes the common meaning entirely as it does when we say you are an "empty head". cant go using words willy-nilly. not a good way to max those SAT exams😊

Originally posted by: chatbuster

dont mind, but by your logic, someone could then perhaps (sadly) conclude you have an empty head.😊

let's see. you have a head, some of it has empty space since there is so much space between all molecules. so should someone then say "empty head"? now would that be offensive, rude and wrong, or not really?😛

fyi, there is a difference between saying some gangster is a hindu, and saying that there is such an oxymoron as a hindu terrorist group. the right juxtaposition of words changes the common meaning entirely as it does when we say you are an "empty head". cant go using words willy-nilly. not a good way to max those SAT exams😊

Agree with CB 😊 and Raksha ji 😊

Originally posted by: raksha.l

I guess you need to go through the post once again..Because no one said there are no Hindu terrorists...However its true that there are NO 'Hindu terrorist orgnanizations' whose ideology is simply to spread hinduism and kill everybody else who is a non-follower of Hinduism...I guess that's what is being said and I hope it helped you clear the confusion...

In any case this thread is not about that and I would love to know your views on the topic of this thread...😊

"No, there are NO terrorists in our religion...You are right we have terrorists in our country as well....they all happen to be muslims though!!! Sad...but very very true!!!!!"

That's what was said in the post..that there are no terrorists in the posters religion, which I'm assuming is Hinduism. I'm not sure if that's what was meant to be said exactly, but that's just the sentence I was responding to, as it caught my attention. I don't disagree with the idea expressed by a lot of posters about there not being any Hindu terrorist organizations, which spread terror in the name of Hinduism, etc, because I haven't heard much conclusive evidence which supports that idea! 😳 And I also have to admit that one doesn't hear very often about terrorism being committed in the name of Hinduism, although I'm sure that somewhere, at some time there has been - it's true, too, however, that the ratio of Hindu to Muslim terrorist organizations isn't even one worth calculating. 😉
I agree that all of this isn't the topic of this debate..I was actually just reading the comments when that caught my eye, and I decided to respond to it. 😊

Originally posted by: mythili_Kiran

Agree with CB 😊 and Raksha ji 😊

I'm afraid you've misunderstood me a bit. I wasn't responding to people's statements that there are no Hindu terrorist organizations, but rather a certain poster's comment which I copied above in which they stated that there are no Hindu terrorists, which I still think is an absolutely false statment! I'm sorry if that led to any confusion! The truth is, that I agree with your sentiments regarding Hindu terrorist organizations..or rather, the surprising lack of them.😉

Dont Bring here Hindu n muslim topic??? ....

Originally posted by: #1EijazFan

I am sorryit was linked with the terrorist issue so it came out, sorry again.😳

Its ok yaaar..........😃..sometime me too talk very extrem way....Bade bade forums main aise chote chote silly baat bi hote rahta hey..so cool..😃

wht does it matter whether there r terrotist in other religions or not or wht ever the once which r there r there and y point fingers at others whn we r ourselves not doing anything abt the terrorist which r present and we all knw abt them very clearly.

Originally posted by: chatbuster

since you rather insultingly characterized member discussion on this thread as veering off-topic, how do you think you have contributed? and i am not just talking here about the new gutter-language you brought in😊

Its like the pot calling the kettle black.

Originally posted by: Believe

Actuly why India need to handle Pak????? 😊 Why we interfear Other countries Internal issues??? 😳 😊

Oh no, why are we blaming poor Pakistan. Punjab and J&K problems are actually a creation Indian Intelligence agencies...we should stop blaming the social welfare organisations like LeT, HM, JeM etc...bechaare logon ki seva kar rahe hain aur hum log unko blame kar rahe hain. Mumbai bomb blasts were actually sponsered by RAW/IB...D-company ekdam nirdosh hai (Dawood to farishta hai). And bechaari ISI humari wajah se bekaar mein badnaam ho gayi hai...Parliament attack bhi humari chaal thi Pakistan ko blame karne ke liye. Kargil ke liye bhi hum zimmedaar hain, bechare Nawaj Shareef ka career khatm ho gayaa uski wajah se. Matlab ki Pakistan jaisa padosi dhoondhne se nahin milega...