Diljit Dosanjh says 1984 was a genocide and not riots - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

53

Views

4.6k

Users

13

Likes

64

Frequent Posters

642126 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#41

LMAO! Delusional. But I am not surprised it is coming from those who voted for INC and also chanted slogans like Hindu Muslim bhai bhai yeh Sikh qaum kahan se aayi in 1984 and joined mobs to target Sikhs in 1984 anr their Salman Khurshid shamelessly wrote that this community felt satisfaction seeing Hindus and Sikhs die in 1980s and felt they were paying for sins of drawing Muslim blood in 1947.

Not surprised at all.

Sometimes when I see this mentality I can easily see why BJP came to power.

bakhtaavar thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#42

There is a very good and disturbing show regarding 1984 riots on Disnep hotstar called "Grahan" , definitely worth a watch.

642126 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: kingkhan22

yeh aur bahdkaa raha hai Khailstaaniyon ko


Instigating person


Every Sikh and every Indian knows it and even govts abroad recognised 1984 as a genocide and so did our own Indian leaders.

Diljit talking same is instigating Khalistanis?

Talking about 1984 is Khalistani? You sound like a Congressi bhakt.

Telling truth is not Khalistani. This is like saying making Kashmir Files instigated someone else in Kashmir and elsewhere or making films on medieval invaders and riots, pogroms is instigating or disturbing harmony.

I am sure if there was a film on demolition of Babri you would find it okay and not instigating.

642126 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#44

These trolls talk like Salman Khurshid. Luckily Owaisi is better than them and acknowledges 1984 as a genocide.

Congress apologists always justify 1984 and forget own deeds in 1947 and why there are no Sikhs or Hindus in certain lands of the pure now.

Dirdam thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

As I said Punjab was one central state where the border line was drawn. The fact that it became a central place in the midst of the chaos all had to do with its location and who became most of the refugees due to how the two countries were divided. Not just murder or rape. Most Sikhs lost most of their land and wealth during the partition. When did I ask my grandmother what her financial circumstances were like now what is Pakistan Punjab compared to how her family fared in India Punjab? She told me she lead a completely different life after partition.

Yes I read somewhere Sikhs were very rich and powerful because Punjab was the richest state before Partition thanks to their fertile land...

566912 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: kingkhan22


all truth

even if u deny

You are in denial. And you have gross false information.

That is the truth.

1247363 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

You are in denial. And you have gross false information.

That is the truth.


Its the other way round sweetie

566912 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: kingkhan22


Its the other way round sweetie

Ey chal.

1247363 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#49

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".