Push to Remove Priyanka Chopra from UNICEF After Tweet About Pakistan- - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

571

Views

32.2k

Users

61

Likes

587

Frequent Posters

1140587 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#81

Originally posted by: sheee


India is no different than Pakistan! Pakistan should hang all terrorists and there should not be any tolerance in anyway regarding any terrorist and terrorist group. Also India should give the Kashmir people the choice and stop state funding terrorism in Kashmir.
I am surprised over people who criticize other country and turn a blind eye when it comes to Kashmir bloodshed. Why is it so hard to have a open mind? No matter what anyone say, until India dare to solve Kashmir problem they can not claim to be a peaceful country. No matter how much Indian scream how peaceful, innocent they are, they are at same level at any other terrorist sponser country.


Kashmir bloodshed was started by Pakis, they are the ones who invaded Kashmir immediately after gaining their independence, not India, the Indian army would never have been there if it wasn't for them.

There cannot be any solution to Kashmir until Pakis abide by the UN resolution, that means demilitarizing the region and withdrawing all of their troops, as well as removing all Paki nationals who weren't there before 1947. We can't even progress towards the next step until the first part of the resolution is met.
1103978 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#82

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_


Kashmir bloodshed was started by Pakis, they are the ones who invaded Kashmir immediately after gaining their independence, not India, the Indian army would never have been there if it wasn't for them.

There cannot be any solution to Kashmir until Pakis abide by the UN resolution, that means demilitarizing the region and withdrawing all of their troops, as well as removing all Paki nationals who weren't there before 1947. We can't even progress towards the next step until the first part of the resolution is met.


Are you talking about the Kashmir region occupied by Pakistan?!
1140587 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#83

Originally posted by: 4thPrincoholic


Are you talking about the Kashmir region occupied by Pakistan?!


Yes, according to the UN Resolution 47, they need to get the f**k out before any plebiscite can take place.
1103978 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#84

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_


Yes, according to the UN Resolution 47, they need to get the f**k out before any plebiscite can take place.


It's been more than 50 years tho... how come UN is still keeping quiet? 😕
Pr1yanka thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 6 years ago
#85

Originally posted by: sheee


India is no different than Pakistan! Pakistan should hang all terrorists and there should not be any tolerance in anyway regarding any terrorist and terrorist group. Also India should give the Kashmir people the choice and stop state funding terrorism in Kashmir.
I am surprised over people who criticize other country and turn a blind eye when it comes to Kashmir bloodshed. Why is it so hard to have a open mind? No matter what anyone say, until India dare to solve Kashmir problem they can not claim to be a peaceful country. No matter how much Indian scream how peaceful, innocent they are, they are at same level at any other terrorist sponser country.



Lol...really...what about Kashmiri pundits ...what about their choice? ...Kashmir just doesnot belong to terrorists in the name of separatists and Muslims in Kashmir...Kashmiri pundits lost everything they had, Coz of these terrorists ...so do read up a little before speaking about Kashmir...
tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#86
Speaking about Kashmiri pandits, did anyone watch the video where Faruq Abdullah went to California to give a speech and the kashmiri pandits protested against him and openly told him that they will take totcourt for being international war criminal
sheee thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#87

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_


Kashmir bloodshed was started by Pakis, they are the ones who invaded Kashmir immediately after gaining their independence, not India, the Indian army would never have been there if it wasn't for them.

There cannot be any solution to Kashmir until Pakis abide by the UN resolution, that means demilitarizing the region and withdrawing all of their troops, as well as removing all Paki nationals who weren't there before 1947. We can't even progress towards the next step until the first part of the resolution is met.

Two wrongs don't make one right. The point is you guys have same mentality, as long as it's not your blood, you don't feel any pain. Asking Pakistanis to question their state, raise voice against terrorism but giving justifications for Kashmir bloodshed. My blood blood, others blood water.
What's the difference? You guys who justify and support terrorism be it Islamic terrorism or state sponsor terrorism are two side of one coin. You can swear and scream, give reasons for army terrorizing Kashmiris, you are doing same.
Not questioning your government, not raising voices against terrorism. So India is not a peaceful and peace loving country they try to portrait. As long as Kashmir conflict is going on, Indian can't claim to be different than any Pakistanis who support or turn a blind eye to terrorism.


sheee thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#88

Originally posted by: Pr1yanka



Lol...really...what about Kashmiri pundits ...what about their choice? ...Kashmir just doesnot belong to terrorists in the name of separatists and Muslims in Kashmir...Kashmiri pundits lost everything they had, Coz of these terrorists ...so do read up a little before speaking about Kashmir...


So terrorists are bad, they are called terrorist because of this. Is Indian army also terrorist? What's the difference?
TotalBetty thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#89

Originally posted by: Laal.Ishq


And your point is ? I suppose you're talking about Quantico? She's an actress which means she acts. That's it. Did she write that episode ? Was she producing it ? She got a huge backlash for it I'm not mistaken but it had nothing to with Priyanka. Abc was responsible for it! It goes back to saying how in the western world/media everything is a fair game as long as it's not against blacks or Muslims. You say or show something against these groups you get shunned instantly. That was fictional character. There's a vast difference between reel life and real life. And what if she is a wannabee ? That's her only crime right ? 👏 And how is this "episode analysis" even related to the topic at hand ?



How quickly people forget

People were enraged then, she had to apologize for that episode

So if Quantico was not cancelled so quickly and still running, they make another episode on recent events, again Priyanka's Alexis Parrish finds out that India was the bad guy not Pakistan, it would be okay I guess bcz she's just an actress

I thought she's also an activist with certain clout, one of the most influential people in the world

She cannot control every dialogue or storyline as an actress but shouldnt she draw a line somewhere esp when she's the lead

Bold - No it's not a crime... it depends what and whom you want to be like... Another member called her wannabe and I expressed my views
Edited by BettyA1 - 6 years ago
TotalBetty thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#90

Originally posted by: sheee


So terrorists are bad, they are called terrorist because of this. Is Indian army also terrorist? What's the difference?



Why is Indian army terrorists?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".