Nothing ever exists... ? - Page 7

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

^^


See, if only you had Googled on what constitutes an observation you wouldn't be asking moronic followup questions now, would you? You probably thought an observer is a person sitting there "watching" electrons with his/her naked eye 😆 Then it probably occurred to your pea-brain that if you take away the watching part and introduce a blind guy into the picture, you would back QM into a corner!! Question then becomes, when you don't know jack sh!t, why don't you stick to topics dealing with marriages and affairs?! Hmm. Now, that's a real doozy of a puzzle.

As for multithreading, it has more to do with a "serial" thought than a cereal has to do with this topic. Again, if your stupid ass had Googled that, you would would have possibly (not probably, but possibly) understood how the concept relates to parallel execution as opposed to "serial" execution, like your stupid pun implied, but then one look at you and I could tell you would fail even an open book exam so I wouldn't expect you to gather even one tidbit of information from the information superhighway, let alone acquire any knowledge!

You talking about acquiring knowledge! 😆 😆 Hilarious! Thanks for making my day.

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Observer is an english word and means what it says,.other than that.. you are going all over the place...

Who cares what your gynecologist may have told you about "Observer" during your pap smear test?! In QM, it means measurement apparatus.

If you have anything insightful 😆 say it otherwise get the fk out of my face, stupid!

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Who cares what your gynecologist may have told you about "Observer" during your pap smear test?! In QM, it means measurement apparatus.

If you have anything insightful 😆 say it otherwise get the fk out of my face, stupid!

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Btw you have signature line ... "If I am not conscious of it, it doesn't exist."... did it ever occur to you that you could be posting from the mental asylum!!! 😆

If you are really curious to to know what that means, you have to ask me in a Vinamratapurvak tone. Remember, Lord Krishna didn't go around teaching Bhagavad Gita to the likes of Duryodhan and Dushasan.

😆lots of good comedy, guys. Very enjoyable😆

i dont see how the author can exterpolate from time having no duration to their being no existence. Time may not exist as a fundamental aspect of the universe (according to some of us) but how does the author conclude that the fact that time has not duration mean nothing exists? There are different theories out there that would suggest that the past, present and future all exist as different states in multiverses. Nothing is changing because all the tenses are there. But as far as existence is concerned, it is there even if everything is static and nothing is changing.

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

i dont see how the author can exterpolate from time having no duration to their being no existence. Time may not exist as a fundamental aspect of the universe (according to some of us) but how does the author conclude that the fact that time has not duration mean nothing exists? There are different theories out there that would suggest that the past, present and future all exist as different states in multiverses. Nothing is changing because all the tenses are there. But as far as existence is concerned, it is there even if everything is static and nothing is changing.

"It" (or what we Vedic scholars 😆 refer to as "that") exists!

What is that "it" or "that"? To quote the brilliant John Wheeler - "It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom at a very deep bottom, in most instances an immaterial source and explanation; that what we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and this is a participatory universe."

"It" could be a simulation or a video game, even though recently they found out that even to simulate a few hundreds of electrons, we need close to infinite resources in terms of computer processing and memory.

But just because it is impossible for us, doesn't mean it is impossible for "Him" or "them".

That said, if I were "Him" or "them", I too would be assailed with the question - who simulated me / us?

Existence doesn't make any sense whatsoever. I call BS on existence.

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

"It" could be a simulation or a video game, even though recently they found out that even to simulate a few hundreds of electrons, we need close to infinite resources in terms of computer processing and memory.

But just because it is impossible for us, doesn't mean it is impossible for "Him" or "them".

Actually, I take it back (that it is impossible to simulate)

While it may be impossible to simulate the universe on a classical computer like the ones we use in our everyday lives, quantum computers are different beasts altogether.

Just yesterday, IBM said it simulated a 56 qubit quantum computer.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/hardware/ibms-quantum-leap-simulates-56qubit-machine

The amount of memory and computational complexity available with quantum computers is off the fking charts.

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

😆lots of good comedy, guys. Very enjoyable😆

oh by the way, nothing exists. So what should we think about the posts above? Pretend they dont exist?😛😆

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

i dont see how the author can exterpolate from time having no duration to their being no existence. Time may not exist as a fundamental aspect of the universe (according to some of us) but how does the author conclude that the fact that time has not duration mean nothing exists? There are different theories out there that would suggest that the past, present and future all exist as different states in multiverses. Nothing is changing because all the tenses are there. But as far as existence is concerned, it is there even if everything is static and nothing is changing.