Why Narendra Modi is criticised? Is he the Worst PM ?

Originally posted by: RitzWalker

Modi jee became the minister only to go to foreign trips.

Acche din is only for rapists, politicians and rich ppl celebrities. Common ppl always get babaji ka thullu.

Originally posted by: Druids

BJP bhakts on twitter go on overdrive trying to propagate the view that unless you're a BJP supporter, you're not a patriot. true. i gave constructive criticism once and one of them called me muslim 😕 and that I should go to pakistan! i hate congress and aap and lefist minorityist parties, but some of them hate minorities as a whole and hate even a bit of criticism. full chamchagiri.

But they are mum when naxals are getting stronger than ever. Even BJP bhakts blame Arun Jaitley for everything. But pray, why does the PM not remove him? What happened to the 56inch chest?i belong to the list of bhakts who hate jaitley. useless fellow is hand in glove with chidambaram. i am bewildered at why modi is allowing jaitley and his mediocre budget and weak stand on corruption to run wild! yes what happened to his 56 inch chest?!

Social media users know about the clandestine way the Barak Missile deal was carried out by 2-in-1 Defence and Finance min, Jaitley.

The inferior, obsolete and expensive Dassault jets have been bought when superior and less expensive 5th gen jets are available. jaitley is an embarassment.

BJP always blames the benami Indian media but what is tying their hands? Why don't they throw them out of the country? So the popular mandate is only for passing missile deals with unfriendly nations and passing land acts on the low? a few people in the govt like smriti irani and vk singh have given a laath up the backside of the media, but this is limited to verbal attacks, and jaitley (or jai italy as he is known now) is the i and b min and keeps going to barkha dutt's show LOL

Originally posted by: maha2us

What is the answer to the questions, 'Is Namo the worst PM/ Is NDA Govt: better than UPA Govt:?' I will answer these questions based on what I learn. What do we expect in a functional democracy? What has to be the function of the Govt:? A democratic country thrives when more and more people of that country take responsibility for the growth of themselves and the country and what the Govt: is expected to do is remove the obstacles on the way for the people to show their full capability. And that is how the developed countries work. Those countries which we call as developed ones are those in which people utilize the unlimited opportunities their country could offer. And in those countries this possibility came up not because of some elected leader who did extraordinary for the people but because of certain circumstances which shook those countries violently. The war of roses in England, French revolution in France, Hitler regime in Germany, nuclear bomb droppings in Japan, Civil war in USA etc. made people in those countries start working for themselves. These are just few examples.

India has certain problems on this way and how they could be resolved is not something which we could easily explain. India has a large size and the population of India is also large. And the way we talk about whether NDA Govt: is better than UPA Govt: is based on how much the Govt: has done to improve the condition of the people. And we also look into how many scams, black dealings happened etc. in each Govt:, These things could not be avoided as long as India is not a functional democracy. I am not sure an elected leader could make this country all on a sudden a functional democracy. Democracy has to be evolved from the bottom and democracy is growing in this country only since 1947. Seventy years is a short period for any country to become a functional democracy and based on what we have done, we have to accept the progress India made is really considerable and deserves to be admired and that is pro0bably because of the good civil servants we have.