Nudity/exposing = Modernizing/ enjoying freedom?? - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

87

Views

7.9k

Users

23

Likes

84

Frequent Posters

Krani thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Engager Level 4 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 12 years ago
#81

Originally posted by: hit_homerun


Aww I was actually enjoying this :P I was also also doing it to actually understand why you have such an aversion to showing skin :)

But I guess if you don't wanna discuss this anymore, fair enough.
Edited by Krani - 12 years ago

Rehanism thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#82
I don't have the faintest idea how you found me offended. And even if I were offended I wouldn't have demanded people to stop debating on the topic. Right to offend is a part of freedom of speech and getting offended cannot be a limit to that freedom.

Do I feel strongly on this matter? Ofcourse I do. This is a matter of human rights and I feel everyone should feel strongly about it. And especially when one sees that people are using the issue of rape and sexual assault to legitimize and further their own prejudiced cultural norms..

Originally posted by: Rehanism


I couldn't have disagreed more with anyone on anything...Under no circumstances is it victim's responsibility for what happens to her.

Many studies have been conducted so far on the psychology of rape and there's no evidence to prove that clothes play any factor in 'attracting' rapists. Most of the rape victims across the world (i.e. above 90%) were, what one may call, moderately dressed and what's more surprising is most of the rapists, when interrogated later, themselves don't remember what their victim wore. In over three-fourth of all rape cases the attacker was someone the victim knew well, more than often a member of house. Further if seductive clothes are a factor, one is at loss to explain the rape epidemic in Egypt or Sudan or Lebanon - or the gang rapes of dalits and tribals in India, or the rape of minors and old women in the most conservative part of the world..The psychology of rape is that of violence, revenge, control, punishment and ego. It has little to do with lust or sexual attraction.


I won't call it offensive, but its definitely saddening how religious and cultural indoctrination has left so many women with a permanent Stockholm syndrome to an extent that they willfully lend a shoulder to the same patriarchal values (and defend its legitimacy) that subjugate their own kind. Women in conservative societies grow up to see their bodies as an object of honour for their family and an object of temptation for the rest of the world. Consecutively, thanks to their upbringing, in the wake of any sexual assault, they believe that they must have done something to bring it upon themselves or in some way enticed their rapist, and therefore they share a part - if not whole - of the responsibility. This is also known as Battered wife's syndrome and this is a reason, among others, why a vast majority of the rape cases go unreported in these societies..


Edited by Rehanism - 12 years ago
Mishe thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#83
1. so does a woman become modern and attractive if she shows the circumference of her naked thighs and hips ?

Nehh, not at all. Being modern has soo many aspects but in terms of fashion, nahhh. You can easily have a modern fashion sense without having to expose skin. I for one can vouch for that

As for attractive, again nope. Imo I'd judge someone as attractive by their physical appearance and personality, not based on whether they're showing skin. Generally when people sport mini skirts, I'll be like whatevs (so they're neither attractive nor unattractive). However, if it's bordering unclassy and desperate for attention, then
I'd say it makes them look unattractive. So it all comes down to why they decided to show some flesh, if it was to look attractive then I'd say it has the complete opposite effect, unbeknownst to them. If it's for say, fashion, and they maintain class, it would have no effect

2. does a teen enjoy her freedom when she observes bodily exposure ?

Mm I'd say a teen would enjoy her freedom once they're done with education ahah but as for bodily exposure... I dno. Depends where you're from I guess

devilindisguise thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#84
*Sigh*
Ders always gnna b a contradiction
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#85
Note:

To all those who are arguing for or against a point, kindly refrain from shoving your religious/social/personal opinion and customs as fundamental truth down the other person's throat.

Thank you.
LN.
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#86
My personal opinion is, calling out rape victims and blaming their choices of dress as the reason for their malady is like blaming a cancer patient for having a cancerous cell. And it still does not explain the high rate of crimes against women in countries like afghanistan where women traditionally cover themselves up totally, neither does victim invited it by her behaviour logic explain the rape of 60 yr old Indian women or little children between age of 5-10.
Freethinker112 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#87
It's not the exposing that is modern, but the right that you have to wear small clothes if you want and are comfortable with it. So, it's the thought that makes you modern, not judging people no matter whether they are fully covered or not., not the clothes.
moomin4455 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#88
Freedom comes with responsibility. All I ask is that whoever exercises the freedom to wear next to nothing has a body that will look good in practically nothing, no matter what the age.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".