Originally posted by: SolidSnake
No, he was 2nd best ODI runs scorer for India in 2007 after Sachin. Let youngsters perform better than him..then they can claim his place.
Exactment!
Some of the youngsters they have selected haven't scored many runs in recent times. I don't have the stats but they reported it in the papers.
Ganguly's been fantastic with the bat while Dravid's been getting there too....
And Laxman's been pretty amazing too!
While I can't say the same about the younger lot.
Also....this ain't T20...the ODI series versus Australia in October proved that. T20 is different and you can get away with an inexperienced lot in it. In ODI's...especially ones taking place in Australia....you need someone who has played in these conditions before...and against such top notch teams too.
In T20 you can get a few hits....hang in there for a few overs and you have done your bit...since the total overs are only 20...
In ODIs...you need to hang in there for a whole longer time...which plenty of the younger lot haven't been able to do so far.
And Yuvraj Singh isn't in form....especially in Australia he's utterly woebegone and helpless....so why is he been given special treatment on a silver platter???
The younger lot should get an opportunity to play...I agree....but then...the selection should be on the basis of performance...and Ganguly's has been phenomenal.....he's been playing as though he was 26!
The Big 3 will ultimately retire....they will retire on their own....and they can be shown the door IF their performance wanes but Tendulkar and Ganguly have actually been batting like firebrands in recent times....as though they've been reborn....and removing an in form Ganguly just to give opportunities to some inexperienced and out of form youngsters(Yuvraj) on the pitches of Australia no less....is completely unfair IMO!
The youngsters haven't done anything in ODIs to impress while the way Ganguly scripted his come back afer that (damn!)Chappel fiasco really made me sit up and say 'kudos!'👏