Originally posted by: maragathm
You know I was listening to Sanjay Manjrekar on cricinfo, and he is right Greg Chapell showed the mirror of the state of Indian cricket to the world. Aussies are like that they are no nonsense, speak the mind, arrogant to an extent kind of people. The problem was I think the players didnt want to get out of their comfort zone and do something different for a change. It is all politics I tell you. The coach is the coach, Tendulkar can be a god, but when it comes to playing a team sport he needs to follow the instructions of the coach and captain, and shove aside his personal opinions. Why do you think Ponting is so successful do you think he puts up with any crap, he demands respect and he gets it. I think Chapell demanded respect as well, and I think the players had a problem with his style and in the end rebelled.
I am not sure the blame falls on one group entirely. Chapell did air out the dirty laundry of Indian cricket to the world, which I am glad he did, it is about time someone spoke up, but in the end it rubbed many of the players the wrong way. Maybe he should have handled what he said to media differently and tried to connect with the players more on an emotional level.
The players had too much we dont like this guy so we are not going to follow him attitude. Which in the end self destructed indian cricket, maybe the players should have made more effort in trying to understand Chapell way of working and gave him a chance, insted of all this infighting.
Sorry, I dont agree! Greg didnt show any mirror of Indian Cricket to the world. It was merely his OWN perception of how Indian Cricket work and the shortcoming Indian Cricket has to cater to HIS requirements!
If there is a comfort zone and it works well for the players what is the need to come out of it? Why is that we underestimate the cricketing minds and capabilities of our very own players? And anyway i think in terms of pure cricketing acumen and ethics i rank Sachin Tendulkar far beyond any Chappel brothers.
No-Nonsense 'Professional' Players? Who defines What Professionalism means? Greg Chappel? Who gives him the authority to call the players Unprofessional? On Professionalism, Werent it the Chappel brothers the ones who bolwed underarm against New Zealand in the final over to win/draw a match? Can one call that professional? It was a mean and a cheap tactic to win... if he dreamt of making India into a set of meanies to get into the 'habit of winning' then I glad our players revolted against him ideologies! Leaking out what happens in the Rest room is being Professional? I dont think so atleast. I found the team much more Professional in that way, never has such differences come out in the open, it doesnt mean there havent been any before.
Yes, he is a coach...he deserves respect from his team. But a person should be of such stature that Respect shouldnt be 'Demanded' but 'Commanded'! Yes, he is a coach and why did HE or his supporters forget that? He was meant to fulfill the needs of the team and NOT rally for a team to fulfill his requirements and aspirations. If he is given a team of Gully cricket players, he needs to coach them into being better players not throw a fuss saying he didnt get the team he requires. By saying that itself he defeated the purpose of this position in the team.. if he didnt understand the requirements of his profile, he should have left much earlier.
A Captain and A Coach are very much a part of the 'Team' as much as the 'Team' requires to stand by its captain and coach, the Captain and Coach should stand by the team. There was 2 groups of kind that has come out in after theWC debacle... where the Coach and captain stood on one side and the rest of the team on the other. And I am not ready to beleive that Coach/Captain's leadership is impeccable and the others were just being 'Rebels' if so many players (far more talented/experienced than Greg & Dravid) feel something is wrong with the way they were handling the team, then i stand by a team. It should have be Rahul Dravid who should have spoken Yday instead of Sachin saying the team stood united. He didnt bother he was busy on a holiday with Family in the backwaters of Kerala. It was Sachin who as a Senior player stood up for the entire team! He took collective responsibility onbehalf of the team. It is clear WHO is a better leader out here.
At the end of the day the truth of the matter is Greg Chappel didnt fit into the Indian System... instead of adapting to the way it performs, he choice to turn it into something else. The result is out there for everyone to see... Indian Cricket stands admist ruins! Chappel is gone and Gone for good!
It will be the set of Indians who will take forward this sport in India. It is not only the way Indian Cricket is played that should improve but the way it is watched also. The team needs unconditionally Support... or no support at all.
Edited by amu682 - 18 years ago
0