|{ The Mahabharat Musketeers # 1 }| *IO*

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Ramya

@Ramya_98

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#141

Originally posted by: VasusenaRadheya

Ye to uttam bichar hai . Let's start with one of the most explosive theory. 😳 It's about Vasudev Krishna . The most important character of the epic without a doubt .

He is my Sakha and mahanayak Arjun is my arya.😳😳 So what about him do we discuss?

Quote

Asandhimitra

@LadyMacbeth

Achiever

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#142

Originally posted by: --Elara--

I love Faisal! And I'm still obsessed with PrAja.Can be well understood from the fact that my username was once crazy-for-praja.😆
Sumedh played ashok's elder step brother right? I forgot the character's name.😛Charumitra's son.

Rajkumar Sushim it was . 😆 PraJa was amazing till preleap only IMO . I somehow could not warm up to the adult actors portraying Ajab and Pratap .

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Ramya

@Ramya_98

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#143

Originally posted by: VasusenaRadheya

Rajkumar Sushim it was . 😆 PraJa was amazing till preleap only IMO . I somehow could not warm up to the adult actors portraying Ajab and Pratap .

Well I kinda liked the elder ones too. But RoSal were pure magic!

Quote

Asandhimitra

@LadyMacbeth

Achiever

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#144

Originally posted by: --Elara--

He is my Sakha and mahanayak Arjun is my arya.😳😳 So what about him do we discuss?

That Vasudev actually had a twin brother/lookalike and the balak Krishna in Vrindaban is different from the Arjun Sakha Vasudev . I read a detailed article in in the no. 1 bengali daily newspaper , where I read many historians hold this view .

Quote

Asandhimitra

@LadyMacbeth

Achiever

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#145

Originally posted by: --Elara--

Well I kinda liked the elder ones too. But RoSal were pure magic!

You like their chemistry better or that of RoSal ? During preleap PraJa track , I started rewatching MB after a long time . Their innocence , beauty , grace everything was unparalleled . ⭐️

Quote

Ramya

@Ramya_98

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#146

Originally posted by: VasusenaRadheya

That Vasudev actually had a twin brother/lookalike and the balak Krishna in Vrindaban is different from the Arjun Sakha Vasudev . I read a detailed article in in the no. 1 bengali daily newspaper , where I read many historians hold this view .

A lookalike? I don't think so. He is mahavishnu's re-incarnation and Dau is Adishesha's. And dau was with him all through. And do you think anyone other than Narayana himself could have slain the demoness putana, or kalia the serpent or lifted the govardhana parvata on his little finger or killed kamsa?

However this is interesting and I want to know why historians think that way.

Quote

Ramya

@Ramya_98

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#147

Originally posted by: VasusenaRadheya

You like their chemistry better or that of RoSal ? During preleap PraJa track , I started rewatching MB after a long time . Their innocence , beauty , grace everything was unparalleled . ⭐️

I liked them both actually. I initially didn't like ssharad but then I started to like him too and rachana was great from the beginning and they had good chemistry.

But yes RoSal had an innocence and were absolutely adorable. Both were perfectly cast.

Quote

Asandhimitra

@LadyMacbeth

Achiever

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#148

Originally posted by: --Elara--

A lookalike? I don't think so. He is mahavishnu's re-incarnation and Dau is Adishesha's. And dau was with him all through. And do you think anyone other than Narayana himself could have slain the demoness putana, or kalia the serpent or lifted the govardhana parvata on his little finger or killed kamsa?
However this is interesting and I want to know why historians think that way.

Of course it was Narayan only . That was the main point . It was supposed to be part of his leela only . .

The article gave about 100 points with proper quotes from the epic , I remember quite a few of them . I think Gargi would also remember it and can put them in words too .

But the trigger of this theory is one very interesting quoting of Sree Radha when she came to visit Krishna in kurukshetra , that I can clearly remember .

Quote

Ramya

@Ramya_98

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#149

Originally posted by: VasusenaRadheya

Of course it was Narayan only . That was the main point . It was supposed to be part of his leela only . .
The article gave about 100 points with proper quotes from the epic , I remember quite a few of them . I think Gargi would also remember it and can put them in words too .
But the trigger of this theory is one very interesting quoting of Sree Radha when she came to visit Krishna in kurukshetra , that I can clearly remember .

So you are saying that Krishna created a copy of himself? A part of Narayana's leela?

Please can you post that quote by radha here?

Quote

Asandhimitra

@LadyMacbeth

Achiever

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#150

Originally posted by: --Elara--

So you are saying that Krishna created a copy of himself? A part of Narayana's leela?
Please can you post that quote by radha here?

That's what I am looking for .

Yes , like all the queens of Vasudev were incarnations of Devi lakshmi only, along with sree radha .