Originally posted by: Nachiketj
He didnt behave like a gentleman in tht Kangana case...he could have kept quite instead he chose to speak any nonsense thinking negative publicity would keep him in limelight...plus his divirce with Suzanne...Suzanne supporters in industry will nevr support him...
SRK had flops but he has given his hits too...what abt Hritik? Name a few movies kaho na oyar hai, koi mil gaya, jodha akbar...after tht?
He kept more quiet than Kangy did in this case.He wasn't the one going around giving interviews to make himself the next mr idealist feminazi.It was Kangs who was being tactical on this case.Also jab koi man vs woman issue hote hain,log aise hi bina soche samjhe mahila ka hi saath denge apna badapan dikhane ke liye.Both genders in such cases should be treated with equaility.I dnt know who is right or wrong in this instance but for some reason,Kangs does not come across as genuine to me.My gut feeling...I could be wrong.
As for comparing SRK and Hrithik is futile.He has been an established star well before Hrithik had set foot in the industry...and since box office no's is all that matters in this game...then there's your answer.There is just no comparison between the two.Why I said that maybe even SRK should leave...is because you said that HR shud leave just over a couple of flops...than in that sense all the big super star's should all retire when they are a couple of flops in?
Edited by shaz2009 - 9 years ago