The No Nonsense Viewers' Circle #5 (I/O) - Page 112

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

34.4k

Users

17

Likes

649

Frequent Posters

Angela_Grokes thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: dabhlover


no no angy😆 my mon puts star plus first when she gets the remote...i am sitting in my room but tat koki shouting is giving pain to my ears from living room... can u imagine how loud her voice is😡

Omg... That loud...😲😲😆
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
deepika gift yourself some noise cancelling headphones 😆
Rocky.Bhai thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AryaDrayCoByrne

I have a question about MB. Why did the pandavas remain silent when draupadi was being degraded in front of the court. why did no one stand up except Krishna who gave her the infinite amount of cloth?



because pandavas were following 100% dharma, actually they had lost her in dice game and they had no rights on her and they themselves were servents ... so this made them tied,
but i condemn this act, especially bhishma... he was tied to his oath or lets say the oath he took controlled his life entirely
Angela_Grokes thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: dabhlover


because pandavas were following 100% dharma, actually they had lost her in dice game and they had no rights on her and they themselves were servents ... so this made them tied,
but i condemn this act, especially bhishma... he was tied to his oath or lets say the oath he took controlled his life entirely

Basically, that was not Dharma if you ask me!🤢
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: dabhlover


because pandavas were following 100% dharma, actually they had lost her in dice game and they had no rights on her and they themselves were servents ... so this made them tied,
but i condemn this act, especially bhishma... he was tied to his oath or lets say the oath he took controlled his life entirely

the concept of dharma is confusing me.
also how did the Pandavas have the right to gamble her anyways? a person is not another persons property that they can gamble away. they could have said something. she is still their wife.
Nerdgal thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Naaa, I mean will Anu make a new one?
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
also I wonder why draupadi was even involved if the issue was with her husbands! regardless of what she said about a blind man's son will always be blind or something like that, and if she did say that then that was not a nice thing to do but still does not justify her public disrobement. yes she was created for reasons known to the gods who can see the future etc but it still is not nice.
Rocky.Bhai thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
ofcourse its not dharma stripping of a woman in hall in front of thousands of men in wat way is dharma...?
but another theory says tat draupadi was never stripped in the actual mahabharath it was later additions by various authors tat added this masala of draupadi being stipped... debate is still going on
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: dabhlover

ofcourse its not dharma stripping of a woman in hall in front of thousands of men in wat way is dharma...?

but another theory says tat draupadi was never stripped in the actual mahabharath it was later additions by various authors tat added this masala of draupadi being stipped... debate is still going on

that is true. there could always be distortions. what does the oldest recorded one say, bearing in mind that it might not be distortion free either.
Rocky.Bhai thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AryaDrayCoByrne

the concept of dharma is confusing me.
also how did the Pandavas have the right to gamble her anyways? a person is not another persons property that they can gamble away. they could have said something. she is still their wife.


tat bas***d shakuni is the master mind behind this dice game

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".