Nandini VS Visaka

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

deejagi

@deejagi

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Guys even in history there was a vishkanya who came to kill Chandra Gupta Maurya. She was sent by Amaathya Rakshash as a gift to Chandra. However Chanakya realised that she was a Vishkanya when the ants who ate the orange residues spit by her died instantly.

So, Vishkanya was a truth but the way they will present her here will be dramatic. Instead of Helena, Mora might propose the wedding between VK and CGM to ward Nandini from the palace and also from Magadh.

looks like Nandini will be called back when Chandra fall unconscious due to poison and the antidote is known to Nandini alone.

Quote

siva06

@siva06

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: deejagi
Guys even in history there was a vishkanya who came to kill Chandra Gupta Maurya. She was sent by Amaathya Rakshash as a gift to Chandra. However Chanakya realised that she was a Vishkanya when the ants who ate the orange residues spit by her died instantly.
So, Vishkanya was a truth but the way they will present her here will be dramatic. Instead of Helena, Mora might propose the wedding between VK and CGM to ward Nandini from the palace and also from Magadh.
looks like Nandini will be called back when Chandra fall unconscious due to poison and the antidote is known to Nandini alone.

quite a good taking off.

.I thought N will be asked to vacate the mahal..meantime CGM would have found the real culprit...so at the time she leaves the mahal, she will run after her and stop her

But your verdict fits well ..but if it is so

there is a character assassination of CGM...what about the true eternal love for her...Can he fall for any beautiful lady who cares for his son?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

All I said where is chaya I did not say she's with Malay but Malay is her husband she lost her baby and her love I won't be surprised if she will choose to go with her husband

Quote

AshtaVasus

@AshtaVasus

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: deejagi
Guys even in history there was a vishkanya who came to kill Chandra Gupta Maurya. She was sent by Amaathya Rakshash as a gift to Chandra. However Chanakya realised that she was a Vishkanya when the ants who ate the orange residues spit by her died instantly.
So, Vishkanya was a truth but the way they will present her here will be dramatic.
Instead of Helena, Mora might propose the wedding between VK and CGM to ward Nandini from the palace and also from Magadh.
looks like Nandini will be called back when Chandra fall unconscious due to poison and the antidote is known to Nandini alone.

Dear Deejagi,

Warm welcome to this thread.

True, as per history, Vishkanya was sent to kill Chandra, but Chanakya diverted her to King Parvatak's room, who was staying as a guest at Pataliputra on that day. As per the political agreement between Parvatak and CGM, after winning Magadh, the kingdom will be divided equally among them.

King Chandra's room, as per history, was changed every two days. He never stayed in the same room for more than two days in the Palace. So, Chanakya cleverly diverted Vishkanya to King Parvatak's room. This way, he eliminated the necessity of dividing Magadh, eliminated the dilution of Chandra's authority, and thwarted the plans of Nand and Vishkanya.

BUT...

King Parvatak and his son Malay, as per the Show, himself has left the luxury of their own Gandhar Kingdom and roaming around in the jungle with an ousted king in exile. God knows why. 😕

Chanakya himself is out of Magadh now. And Amatya, is proving to be more intelligent than Chanakya in the Show... 😆

So, Vishkanya cannot be diverted by Chanakya, and cannot be sent to King Parvatak. Once again, we will be glorifying the heroine for the credits.

Quote

deejagi

@deejagi

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: siva06

quite a good taking off.

.I thought N will be asked to vacate the mahal..meantime CGM would have found the real culprit...so at the time she leaves the mahal, she will run after her and stop her

But your verdict fits well ..but if it is so

there is a character assassination of CGM...what about the true eternal love for her...Can he fall for any beautiful lady who cares for his son?

Siva, there is no question of character assassination of CGM, as he was a king and was allowed to many'N' number of times and also Love and Lust were 2 different things which had no correlation. A king was allowed to love one but that doesn't stopped him from marrying others and also he was expected to marry for political reasons, expansion of his empire, to eliminate his enemies etc. So even if CGM marries some one after Nandini, that doesn't doubt on his love or character.

Quote

Joyee Banerjee

@Animal.Lover

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

True, as per history, Vishkanya was sent to kill Chandra, but Chanakya diverted her to King Parvatak's room, who was staying as a guest at Pataliputra on that day. As per the political agreement between Parvatak and CGM, after winning Magadh, the kingdom will be divided equally among them.
King Chandra's room, as per history, was changed every two days. He never stayed in the same room for more than two days in the Palace. So, Chanakya cleverly diverted Vishkanya to King Parvatak's room. This way, he eliminated the necessity of dividing Magadh, eliminated the dilution of Chandra's authority, and thwarted the plans of Nand and Vishkanya.

BUT...
King Parvatak and his son Malay, as per the Show, himself has left the luxury of their own Gandhar Kingdom and roaming around in the jungle with an ousted king in exile. God knows why. 😕

Chanakya himself is out of Magadh now. And Amatya, is proving to be more intelligent than Chanakya in the Show... 😆

So, Vishkanya cannot be diverted by Chanakya, and cannot be sent to King Parvatak. Once again, we will be glorifying the heroine for the credits.

😆 True! Arey this show is 95% fiction. Even Durdhara's death for that matter. She was supposed to die of an unfortunate accident according to history. Chanakya used to mix tiny amounts of poison in Chandragupta's food so he would become immune to it, but one day a pregnant Durdhara consumes it by mistake. Yahan to poora conspiracy theory hi dikha diya. So what of the Vishkanya track 😆

This has by far been the worst history based shows I have seen in a long time, and it's a pity considering that they have employed an excellent cinematographer, and some very able performers.

Quote

Joyee Banerjee

@Animal.Lover

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: rajatshweta
King Parvatak and his son Malay, as per the Show, himself has left the luxury of their own Gandhar Kingdom and roaming around in the jungle with an ousted king in exile. God knows why. 😕

🤣

I sware! This is another awfully illogical thing happening in the show. Especially when both father and son are supposed to be all shrewd and calculative, definitely not the "selfless & loyal" kinds, like Rakshas. Then why?

Quote

AshtaVasus

@AshtaVasus

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: Animal.Lover

🤣
I sware! This is another awfully illogical thing happening in the show. Especially when both father and son are supposed to be all shrewd and calculative, definitely not the "selfless & loyal" kinds, like Rakshas. Then why?

Malay and Parvatak joined hands with NAND because a). They wanted Nandini (b) they wanted Magadh.

How they thought of possessing Magadh through Nandini, while NAND had 9 sons, still beats the s*** out of me.

Now, they have lost both Nandini and Magadh to Chandra. So, purpose is lost.

NAND himself had made several failed attempts at Chandra. Malay tried his tricks and Parvatak tried his. All failed.

The least that the Father-Son can do, is inform NAND, That they will be ready to send their Gandhar army whenever NAND wages war with Chandra. Bcoz shatru ka shatru mitr hota hai. And till such time, enjoy the daasis at Gandhar.

And here both the nut cases are roaming around happily, like puppies, around NAND, taking orders from him. Why, oh Why ???!!! God only knows...😡

Quote

1115557

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

I'm not supposed to post about this here...But the girl who's playing vishkanya can't act .

I've seen her in nagarjun too, but she really didn't much to do there.

But here, I can't tolerate this girl for even a second

Firstly, her costumes are extremely weird. I can say the facts that none of the vishkanyas wore snake motifs on their costume .

These vishkanyas were trained in extreme spyfare.

And the first rule of anyone on a covert mission is to look completely different what your ultimate motive is.

2ndly, they never talked like in that hissing manner which she indulges in many times.

So I can say that, the girl who plays vishkanya in the serial is absolutely a wrong choice for the role.

1st of all, they should've taken some sensual looking girl for this role.

Vish kanyas are mostly seductresses, who are seen as bad girls but still adored by men.

This girl is extremely cute looking .

She fails to convince me even a bit .

They should've taken some one like ridhima pandit or even pavitra punia.

Plus her costumes . They look extremely funny.

Plus that make up makes her look even more fugly.

Overall, I may say this serial is a bogus.

Only rajat and Chetan are good .

They're also prolonging this vishkanya drama

Quote

AshtaVasus

@AshtaVasus

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: Luna99
I'm not supposed to post about this here...But the girl who's playing vishkanya can't act .
I've seen her in nagarjun too, but she really didn't much to do there.
But here, I can't tolerate this girl for even a second
Firstly, her costumes are extremely weird. I can say the facts that none of the vishkanyas wore snake motifs on their costume .
These vishkanyas were trained in extreme spyfare.
And the first rule of anyone on a covert mission is to look completely different what your ultimate motive is.
2ndly, they never talked like in that hissing manner which she indulges in many times.
So I can say that, the girl who plays vishkanya in the serial is absolutely a wrong choice for the role.
1st of all, they should've taken some sensual looking girl for this role.
Vish kanyas are mostly seductresses, who are seen as bad girls but still adored by men.
This girl is extremely cute looking .
She fails to convince me even a bit .
They should've taken some one like ridhima pandit or even pavitra punia.
Plus her costumes . They look extremely funny.
Plus that make up makes her look even more fugly.
Overall, I may say this serial is a bogus.
Only rajat and Chetan are good .
They're also prolonging this vishkanya drama

Dear Luna99,

A warm welcome, on behalf of Siva, to this thread.

You're right. You have posted in a wrong thread. You should have posted your comment in Siva's yesterday's episode synopsis - where VK showed some streak of acting 😆

Dear, I beg to differ with your Vishkanya comment - only slightly. Sure, the VK can't act. But she is NOT a wrong choice for the role. After seeing the Anaconda in a similar role 😕that Rajat had in his past life, I heaved a huge sigh of relief 😉😛after seeing this VK.

She sure is an eye-candy, most suited for a seductress role, with her backless costumes, choice of bold coloured costume and lipstick. VKs are well trained in warfare, and this girl too, seemed to have everyone in the Palace so far with her stunts.

Yes, I agree that she shouldn't be wearing a motif of a snake in her Bindi and costume - but May be, its the CVs stupid way of convincing us that she is a vamp - much like the hair twirls and long nails that Roopa had...

Yep, she is extremely good looking - that I would have chosen her for Malti's role, instead of a Vishkanya - so that whenever the script bores us viewers, atleast the screen would light up with a beautiful woman's presence. Malti's existing face is such a boring one, to fill screen space.

Chetan - I am sorry, I wouldn't credit him anything in this Show. He is repeating the same character, emoting same facial expressions, same smirks, same lusting on Sister in Law, same lusting on all Daasis in the Palace, same ditching of his own wife, same plotting against the Emperor. EVERYTHING HE DID IN HIS LAST ROLE IN JA. well, except for the change of costume, ofcourse.

Edited by rajatshweta - 8 years ago

Quote

1 2 3

Nandini VS Visaka - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics