The sizzling hamam scene - Page 2

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

I think CGM and CK have something up their sleeve. 😉 It's quite unlikely that Chandu will go against Chanakya's wisdom in political affairs, leave alone insult Chanakya, that too in front of two ladies ... Highly unlikely. 😛

Yes very unlikely even in history, we had an account of their difference of opinion on some issues and later it was proved that they both enacted a drama

It's like the dialog that Commodus says in Gladiator movie :-

"I have been told of a certain sea snake which has a very unusual method of attracting its prey. It will lie at the bottom of the ocean as if wounded. Then its enemies will approach, and yet it will lie quite still. And then its enemies will take little bites of it, and yet it remains still." ..

It's an age old trick to let the Culprit go free to make him commit more mistakes, just to catch him red handed in his criminal activity.

Here, CK and CGM had meeting first, and then they called Aparna. There's no reason for CGM to insult CK in front of Aparna. He could have just rejected the entire conplaint of CK, without Even calling Aparna in the first place. Something fishy there.

my point is..they have shown only the partial conversation between Apama and Chandra..she should have blackmailed him on Nandini's issue to expose her to prajas and CK and she has done all these with out her daughter's knowledge

CK knows that Aparna has hands on :

a) Misusing Rajmudra which is serious political crime

b) Involvement in Roopa's case - Rajdroh - treason against King making him face an imposter Queen

c) Kidnapping of Bindu in Kaling - threat to King, Prince and entire Magadh kingdom.

Aparna simply tells Chandra - I was using Sunanda to get info on NAND to help you. How can she be helping and be against Chandra ? She dint tell him anything about misuse of Rajmudra, and she definitely had no idea of CK knowing about her involvement in Bindu's kidnap case.

Yet, he appeared to have believed her stance and stood against Acharya for snatching the Rajmudra from her.

Also, remember, Chandra reprimanded Helena for letting go of Bindu so easily at Kaling, when the kidnappers came.

I think both CK and CGM are trying to find out what else conspiracy Aparna has done (or). Whether Helena has her hands on this too.

As far As that spoiler of Chanakya seeing help from Nandini goes ---- my guess is ... He would want to know where (which place / country) can you get the jadibooti for Making Durdhara's poison. Nandini has more knowledge on medicine. Remember, she told Chandra that you get the special medicine or Bindu's case only in Kaling (when she was treating Bindu before she fell into Chandu's arms). ???? So, Nandu might know that the poison that was given to Durdhara is not from India. It's videshi medicine. CK might get a clue there on Aparna's dealings, since he saw her hiding something on that day in Durdhara's room. Nandu's innocence could be proved after all.

In spoiler they say..Chandra confides the truth of Chandrika to Acharya.But it is a mega serial..will they allow villains to be exposed so easily. Apama is more than Maham Anga..so the first elimination should be this lecher

Besides this, we have :

- letter from Durdhara stating the clue word "Sauten" at Helena

- arm twisting can be done by CK and CGM on Sunanda, Helena's permanent daasi who helped her in kidnapping Roopa in that small room, and Aparna's spy who went to give information to NAND in Kaling, and get them to confess in the Open Court against Helena and Aparna.

I think they are buying time to do all this activity. Am I being too positive ??!! 😆

Not too positive but +ve..they need episodes to run..that is the main issue..so they will elong it to the maximum possible..in the limit to test our patience

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

I think CGM and CK have something up their sleeve. 😉 It's quite unlikely that Chandu will go against Chanakya's wisdom in political affairs, leave alone insult Chanakya, that too in front of two ladies ... Highly unlikely. 😛

It's like the dialog that Commodus says in Gladiator movie :-

"I have been told of a certain sea snake which has a very unusual method of attracting its prey. It will lie at the bottom of the ocean as if wounded. Then its enemies will approach, and yet it will lie quite still. And then its enemies will take little bites of it, and yet it remains still." ..

It's an age old trick to let the Culprit go free to make him commit more mistakes, just to catch him red handed in his criminal activity.

Here, CK and CGM had meeting first, and then they called Aparna. There's no reason for CGM to insult CK in front of Aparna. He could have just rejected the entire conplaint of CK, without Even calling Aparna in the first place. Something fishy there.

CK knows that Aparna has hands on :

a) Misusing Rajmudra which is serious political crime

b) Involvement in Roopa's case - Rajdroh - treason against King making him face an imposter Queen

c) Kidnapping of Bindu in Kaling - threat to King, Prince and entire Magadh kingdom.

Aparna simply tells Chandra - I was using Sunanda to get info on NAND to help you. How can she be helping and be against Chandra ? She dint tell him anything about misuse of Rajmudra, and she definitely had no idea of CK knowing about her involvement in Bindu's kidnap case.

Yet, he appeared to have believed her stance and stood against Acharya for snatching the Rajmudra from her.

Also, remember, Chandra reprimanded Helena for letting go of Bindu so easily at Kaling, when the kidnappers came.

I think both CK and CGM are trying to find out what else conspiracy Aparna has done (or). Whether Helena has her hands on this too.

As far As that spoiler of Chanakya seeing help from Nandini goes ---- my guess is ... He would want to know where (which place / country) can you get the jadibooti for Making Durdhara's poison. Nandini has more knowledge on medicine. Remember, she told Chandra that you get the special medicine or Bindu's case only in Kaling (when she was treating Bindu before she fell into Chandu's arms). ???? So, Nandu might know that the poison that was given to Durdhara is not from India. It's videshi medicine. CK might get a clue there on Aparna's dealings, since he saw her hiding something on that day in Durdhara's room. Nandu's innocence could be proved after all.

Besides this, we have :

- letter from Durdhara stating the clue word "Sauten" at Helena

- arm twisting can be done by CK and CGM on Sunanda, Helena's permanent daasi who helped her in kidnapping Roopa in that small room, and Aparna's spy who went to give information to NAND in Kaling, and get them to confess in the Open Court against Helena and Aparna.

I think they are buying time to do all this activity. Am I being too positive ??!! 😆

Originally posted by: alanta

Hi I am new to the forum. I was intentionally staying away from this show as it is an Ek show(had done enough with them, same concept with different faces) . But 2 weeks ago 'unfortunately '

I happened to watch an episode where Chandra sees Nandhini for the first time post leap, while Nandhini saving her Bhabhi's child during the sword flight with the goons. Actually the way Chandra was looking at Nandhini amidst the fight, with helplessness, love, hatred, feeling betrayed.. Say a thousand expressions all at once (Brilliant RT👏) That very one scene has drawn me to the show. Since then I was catching up with the previous episodes.

Coming to the scene which is the matter of discussion here, even I felt the trip and fall scene was rather forced. But the FB scene seemed a victim of CVs carelessness. Be it yesterday's fb scene or the payal fb scene, the CVs made Rajat shot for the scenes with his present appearance which was meant for the post leap scenes. The stubbles and his not so often hair cut gives him a heavy sober look that is apt for the present story line but not for the FB scenes. Despite his husky voice and cute smile he couldnt lighten the air, the sobberness is still there. Had it been taken with his long hair and clean face, the fb scene would have looked much better. Appearance do matters to an undeniable extent in the portrayal of different moods of a character. Hope this would be sorted out soon.

Originally posted by: aishwish

Hey alanta welcome to the forum dear

I hope you have a good time here😊

The scene you are talking about ...the chandra nandini post leap meeting...I agree with you that one particular shot of RT was indeed impressive...especially the way he slashed two of the bandits while being pre occupied with the thousand emotions running inside him

About the FB scenes unfortunately this will continue as they have not got any bank episodes of FBs shot already...I wish RT grows his hairs soon as much as I appreciate this cropped hair look..I kind of have started missing his locks

Originally posted by: alanta

Thank you so much aish. Yea me too hope so.

Yes that sounds very unfortunate. But yes he is ok with the cropped hair as it goes well with the current scenario. But right from the prithviraj chauhan days, have been so used to see him with his long hair be it tied or open. With this hair cut it seems with this we are seeing a completely different person neither chandra nor RT. Even if he decides to grow back his hair we might have to wait for another 2-3weeks

Originally posted by: Avantika1115

Sangeetha , you seems to have a very high expectations on Cvs?

Originally posted by: aishwish

Sangeetha...yup you are being too positive i guess side effects of hamam scene😆

Jokes apart well said bang on...I think this might happen of course not as logically as you have presented😆 but yes some where on the same lines

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Aish...

🤣 ... sure it is !!!!! Even Chandu's 8 pack Abs couldn't redeem it !!!

But please ya... He looks way too heart throbbingly handsome with his new hairstyle. Poor guy, he has had long hair for too long (Prithviraj Chauhan, Jalal, Naagin Nevla, and now Chandra) ..., let his neck be free from those locks for few months 😉😃