Everything wrong with this show

1. The Palace looks unreal considering Mauryan Period used Wood and Stones to build palaces and not Bricks. The palace looked like of Rajaput Period.
2. Magadha looked more like Rajasthan than modern day Bihar.
3. The dressing is very exhibiting and inaccurate. The dressing of Helen is nice but of Dharma and Charumitra and specially of Nurbano or Nur whatever didn't match the mauryan period.
4. The royal headgear was also not accurate.
5. Selecus Nicator confined himself to western conquests and forgot the eastern provinces after giving them to Chandragupta.
6. Helen may have been of same age as Bindusara. Chandragupta was in his 40s when he married Helen and he surely wouldn't marry an old lady. That was against the honour of a king.
7. Justin also may have been younger than Bindusara or even younger than Ashoka if he was born in history. When Chandragupta renounced throne bindu was already married so...he surely had kids.
8. Bindusara maintained very cordial relations with Greeks and till Ashoka no greek dared to attack India.
9. Khorasan is perhaps the biggest blunder of this show. Totally of not that era. The dressing, the way of talking, their names...everything is wrong.
10. Bindusara and Antiochus were friends. Antiochus was son of Selecus and Bindusara was son of Chandragupta so Antiochus was brother in law of Chandragupta and in that case step uncle in law of Bindusara.

Originally posted by: librapiscesarie

Theeek hai yaaarr ..
Jussst chilaaax...& watch show & just tk good points from it.

If u dislike, then just stop watching this show & watch the older version TV serial Chanakya..
😆

Originally posted by: HISTORY-Student

see this abt history ,if u tell fake history ppl will question it

u cant guide the ppl to watch or stop watch 😆