You cant compare her to people like Priyanka, Katrina and especially Bipasha! 😆 😆 😆
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 26th Sept 2025
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 27th Sep 2025 - WKV
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: IND vs SL, Match 18, A1 vs B1 - Super 4 @Dubai🏏
DIL DOORMAT 27.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 27, 2025 || EDT
Besharmi ki sari hadein paar karegi Abhira- Media is catching up
Sabse Nalla Kaun in gen 4
Book Talk Reading Challenge: open to volunteers
Anupamaa 26 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Is noina mandira post plastic surgery?
70th Filmfare Awards Nominations
CID episode 81 - 27th September
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 28, 2025 EDT
Ranbir Kapoor Birthday Celebration Thread 🎂🎂
BOOTH ROAMING 28.9
SAMAR ki hogi re entry !!
It's sad that at 29, Rani is counted along with older actors. But she is to be blamed for doing all mature roles and mostly getting typecast with same make-up, dressing style that these days, it is practically difficult to distinguish Rani's one film from another. Bipasha is 32 though she claims to be 28 but still counted as young actor. 32 or 28 doesn't matter but what matters is how you portray yourself on and off- screen. Rani is suddenyl aloof and least bothered about her appearances in films as well as real life.
Other than Kareena I don't see potential in present lot of female actors that is considering Priyanka and Bipasha as non-actors. I have never found them convincing or good. Both of them are just OK. Vidya Balan is good but she has limited range. Sonam and Deepika are yet to show their capability. Kareena has done wide range of roles and got appreciation. She is almost same age as Rani but still fresh and doing diverse roles.
i think rani sadly has been typecasted as a yash raj poster girl. the problem is that she has done way too many films for the YRF banner that people cannot look beyond that.😆😆
but rani is a powerful actress. she adds a new dimension to whatever character she is playing. so much so that you don't see her as rani mukherjee anymore but as the characters themselves like michelle or gulabi.👏👏
so far me, rani will not get boring. not in a long time.😊
Originally posted by: misselegent
yaar i know 2007 has been bad year for her but she did amazing as gulabo in sanwarya
dun worry she will rise again in 2008 😊
yea.....i think that she will make it up in 2008
It's sad that at 29, Rani is counted along with older actors. But she is to be blamed for doing all mature roles and mostly getting typecast with same make-up, dressing style that these days, it is practically difficult to distinguish Rani's one film from another. Bipasha is 32 though she claims to be 28 but still counted as young actor. 32 or 28 doesn't matter but what matters is how you portray yourself on and off- screen. Rani is suddenyl aloof and least bothered about her appearances in films as well as real life.
Other than Kareena I don't see potential in present lot of female actors that is considering Priyanka and Bipasha as non-actors. I have never found them convincing or good. Both of them are just OK. Vidya Balan is good but she has limited range. Sonam and Deepika are yet to show their capability. Kareena has done wide range of roles and got appreciation. She is almost same age as Rani but still fresh and doing diverse roles.
i knew bipasha is in 30s becoz she looks older than what she claims to be around late 20s. same goes for mallika, sherawat i dont believe she is around early 20s. why you think vidya has limited range?
What happened to all the people? Did all moved to Reddit and other places? There are hardly any comments in here for any topics.
Shah Rukh Khan, Rani Vikrant at the National film awards cersmony https://x.com/ani/status/1970437587610288548?s=46 t=gmo_g396jwmtO4eUOAuljw...
https://twitter.com/GossipsTv/status/1970481023491404050
I am so sad for Katrina. Time to post a topic away from my job troubles. Priyanka and Preity had kids with surrogacy or IVF methods. Why can’t...
https://x.com/taran_adarsh/status/1970002789612085315
86