SRK's career without KJo and YRF - what would it be? - Page 5

Honestly...who cares? This topic has been done to death.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Log kehte hain ki SRK dono haath faila kar star ban gaya....Bhai sabke favorites try kar sakte hain....ye alag baat hai ki log chavvani pakda kar chale jaayenge dono haatho mein...🤣

Baaki sab theek hai, ye kuch jayda ni ho gaya 😆

WITH OR WITHOUT; SRK IS SRK 👏

https://youtu.be/mXkbWKr5ovU

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Jo bhi kaha hai...against SRK??

OK lunch over...back to work now.

Nahi janab, Khan Saab ke against main kuch nahi sun sakta. Don't you know I am his biggest fan.

Jo aapne kaha, to that I agree.

Can anyone explain to me the hate for MNIK? I get that KANK was a bad movie but MNIK was not. It actually provided great scope for performance to both Shah and Kajol. Something that botH KKHH and K3G lacked. Even ddlj lacked it

Srk is nothing without yrf n 🐍 kjo. Cuz of them he became popular by playing same romantic role n got oops buyied awards for his overrrated performances.

Originally posted by: winterblues

This is all a bundle of madeup things, and not true at all.

Srk never took a risk, and it was never a do or die situation for him to be forcefully cast in negative roles.

The truth is, much before he was even signed for any risky negative roles of Darr, Baazigar and Anjaam, he was offered and started shooting for conventional romantic hero roles in films like Deewana, Raju bann gaya gentleman, King Uncle, Dil aashna hai and Chamatkar in which he played the roles of conventional romantic hero and 3 films out of those 5 were successful.

He got good offers at the start of his career due to his tv popularity. Big producers like kundan shah and Aziz mirza totally supported him and even Hema Malini selected him for her ambitious first directorial dil aashna hai.

He never had any shortage of offers that's why he had 5 releases in his debut Year 1992 and all were having him in romantic conventional hero roles.

Another major self-madeup and totally incorrect thing in the above post is the statement "when none of the leading heroes were ready to take the risk of portraying a negative character".

Salman Khan was very enthusiastic to do Baazigar, he was the first and original choice of this film, but Saleem Khan wanted a better climax which could connect with the audience (later the same climax was used by the directors which Saleem suggested) but the makers didn't agreed that time and Srk stepped in as the second choice.

Darr was also originally an Amir Khan movie, who already portrayed a negative and dark character in his 2nd film Raakh for which he was even nominated for the National award as a best actor.

Due to the joint narration issue with Sunny, which everyone knows, Amir had to leave Darr, a role he was very excited to portray.

I love this post, bang on point. After ages, seeing such a fine to the point post on any topic.

Knowledge bhi hai, Saleeka bhi hai, Dhamaal hai jo bhi hai 👏

I never said I believe the affair. I said the alleged affair and rumours around it were milked to market Don series and especially pumped up promotions around Don 2. It did help the film and it is sad how even a film like Don had to be marketed on basis of chemistry or offscreen alleged affair of its male and female leads.

The argument is not about nepotism at all but how SRK mostly remained confined to YRF, Dharma and got slotted as mainly a romantic hero thanks to them. Despite his potential as a versatile hero.

What would Big B's career be without Manmohan Desai,Prakash Mehra,Sippy...Big stars and directors become exclusive..and stars work for other directors when they get a gap.

The same can be said about Amir,Salman,Akki during their prime

Take the whole career, Khan Saab has yet to give any film bigger than DDLJ & KKHH, ek YRF and ek DHARMA.

He would have been nothing without those 2 films.