Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose
Ya some were absolutely worst but let’s not equate Indian Muslims with them. The past is where it needs to be. Most of them are converts anyways. Atleast these rulers were 100 of years ago. Hate politics in present day and age is unacceptable. It works because people do have hatred in their hearts. They actually support this kind of ethnic cleansing and hatred which is why they support them. Economic policies are just an eyewash they use to defend themselves. You support m evil, you are evil. End of story. Goes for extremists and fanatics that come from any religion.
Us se acha toh yeh hai.. just ban politics based on religion. Anyone who makes hate speeches/comments or tries to appease a particular religion should be disqualified from entering politics ever. Same with politicians that talk shit like “rape happens in India and not Hindustan” Na Congress appease kar payegi aur na BJP.
These people don’t want India to progress because if people become well educated and well aware.. who will buy their bullshit?
People need to stop comparing India with countries which are worse off or aren’t democratic. Please do India a favour and set a positive example.
The problem is, that some people end up offering apologia for Islamic bigotry in the garb of fighting 'bhakts'. That's what I cannot tolerate.
No sane person supports hatred or lynchings or anything else. But the problem is when some people end up justifying one, much worse and large scale form of bigotry, to highlight another.
Also, Indian Muslims have nothing to do with invaders, but the school textbooks tend to glorify them and downplay their atrocities, largely as an attempt to appease Muslims and create a false, pro-Islamic invader narrative. This was largely started during Congress rule and supported by the Left intelligentsia.
Edited by Mahisa_22 - 3 years ago
57