Sridevi vs Madhuri- who was prettier in their younger days? - Page 3

Also never really got the hype around Madhuri .

Madhuri's eyes were killer man😍😍😍

Also never really got the hype around Sridevi .

Originally posted by: MargaritaLover

The pic you posted of Sridevi was after multiple surgeries. While Madz was always natural since her debut movie Abodh in 1984

if Sridevi got the knife, Madhuri caked herself with makeup to go from the pic you quoted - plain Jane - to the bombshell she came to be known as.

I actually happen to think Madhuri was prettier, but the nonsense of disfavorably comparing a 13-year-old CHILD in the throes of puberty to a 20-something-year-old woman who was fully made up needs to be pointed out.

Then that person claimed the title of the post claims the comparison is between them in their *younger* days. I guess as in it didn't specify how much younger. Well the title didn't specify anything about plastic surgery or makeup, either. So there.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

if Sridevi got the knife, Madhuri caked herself with makeup to go from the pic you quoted - plain Jane - to the bombshell she came to be known as.

I actually happen to think Madhuri was prettier, but the nonsense of disfavorably comparing a 13-year-old CHILD in the throes of puberty to a 20-something-year-old woman who was fully made up needs to be pointed out.

Then that person claimed the title of the post claims the comparison is between them in their *younger* days. I guess as in it didn't specify how much younger. Well the title didn't specify anything about plastic surgery or makeup, either. So there.

Aaj mujhe woh famous shair yard aa gaya: Make It Make Sense.

Because sweetie you posted a photo of Sridevi at age 19/20 (promo shots of 1983's Kalaakaar) and Madhuri at 15/16 (she shot 1984's Abodh before her 17th birthday) as a retort to my original post. Which is just a nullification as well as a lollification. 🤪

Anyhows, here's a photograph of both beauties in 2012. Madhuri ma'am aged 45, Sridevi ma'am aged 49.

🥺

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

Aaj mujhe woh famous shair yard aa gaya: Make It Make Sense.

Because sweetie you posted a photo of Sridevi at age 19/20 (promo shots of 1983's Kalaakaar) and Madhuri at 15/16 (she shot 1984's Abodh before her 17th birthday) as a retort to my original post. Which is just a nullification as well as a lollification. 🤪

Anyhows, here's a photograph of both beauties in 2012. Madhuri ma'am aged 45, Sridevi ma'am aged 49.

🥺

16/17 is not 13 going through puberty, bud. Makes a difference. As it is, young girls are shamed for acne, shamed for their complexion, shamed for their weight, shamed for their figure. They're given impossible standards to look up to.

On that photo, gorgeous!

FYI, I read Sridevi saying somewhere that her eyes and her height made her attractive. Rest of her was ordinary. She considered Jaya Prada a true beauty.

Sridevi even without makeup she looks cute, having a nose job doesn't make her ugly, even in that 13 year old pic and compare to madhuri 13 year old sridevi looked million times cuter. that pic of madhuri looks dull, not facial features

Ok sridevi in julie she did not have nose surgery then but look way better than madhuri man, madhuri only has good teeth but no facial features like eyes an all that.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Whoever posted Sridevi's pic when she was going through puberty in full view of the Indian public...

It's the same as mocking someone for growing old.

Unless life is unfortunately cut short, both are stages we all have to go through

agree she was 13 but noway looked ugly as that poster tried to make it out lol, she was player a village girl, same year she done julie

Sridevi had a great body, not face in her younger years😆