What Will It Take For Everyone To Cancel Kangana ? - Page 2

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

i don't like dumb-heads using their influence to make political statements. Its unfair to the millions who are poor and who would be benefitted by the policies she's opposing. Its especially dishonest when she has no effing clue about the issues.

I also think it would be very hypocritical for her to be dipping into the tax candy jar after acting all preachy.... and wonderful when she's nailed for it.

1. It's called freedom of speech. She, you, and any other heads - dumb or otherwise - are free to say anything as long as it is not incitement, hate speech, or otherwise illegal.

2. Tax raid doesn't mean she actually did anything. Let them charge her. Even so, hypocrisy is not a punishable offense.

Kangana, OTOH, actually called for violence against groups. She stalked and harassed a man and his family. She used a dead man's tragedy to level accusations, which if unfounded, does leave her open to charges.

ie, what Tapsee did is political ideology which people may or may not like. It could be hypocrisy. If she is a tax cheat, she will get punished.

What Kangana did is criminal.

Conflating the two over political ideology is rather reprehensible as it minimizes the real threat to life and limb Kangana posed to people she found convenient to victimize. In other words: people could've died or been harmed or gone to prison without just cause because of her. Support of her criminality tars the supporter as well.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

1. It's called freedom of speech. She, you, and any other heads - dumb or otherwise - are free to say anything as long as it is not incitement, hate speech, or otherwise illegal.

2. Tax raid doesn't mean she actually did anything. Let them charge her. Even so, hypocrisy is not a punishable offense.

Kangana, OTOH, actually called for violence against groups. She stalked and harassed a man and his family. She used a dead man's tragedy to level accusations, which if unfounded, does leave her open to charges.

ie, what Tapsee did is political ideology which people may or may not like. It could be hypocrisy. If she is a tax cheat, she will get punished.

What Kangana did is criminal.

Conflating the two over political ideology is rather reprehensible as it minimizes the real threat to life and limb Kangana posed to people she found covenient to victimize.

yeah, talking about freedom of speech, someone asked me... and I gave my reason for why I think she's dumb, hypocritical and perhaps a tax cheat. My opinion. 😉 😉 😉

as for your being sure what kangana did is criminal, i dont see anyone taking her to task for the things you are talking about. But since you are so sure, go for it, man. No sweat off my back 😂

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

yeah, talking about freedom of speech, someone asked me... and I gave my reason for why I think she's dumb, hypocritical and perhaps a tax cheat. My opinion. 😉 😉 😉

as for your being sure what kangana did is criminal, i dont see anyone taking her to task for the things you are talking about. But since you are so sure, go for it, man. No sweat off my back 😂

Yes, you do have the same FoS as I said in the post you quoted. No one suggested throwing you in jail for it as you suggested should happen to Tapsee. Therein lies the difference.

As for Kangana being taken to task... there is something called law and order. I believe wheels of justice grind fine even if they grind slow. We shall see what happens.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Yes, you do have the same FoS as I said in the post you quoted. No one suggested throwing you in jail for it as you suggested should happen to Tapsee. Therein lies the difference.

As for Kangana being taken to task... there is something called law and order. I believe wheels of justice grind fine even if they grind slow. We shall see what happens.

😂 do we really have to explain basics of debating? 😂 See, there's a difference between talking about celebs and talking about members. For example, we could say some celeb needs to be put away in a mental institution. But we couldn't say that about you, could we? Even if it were warranted 😉 😉 😉 That would be a personal attack.

Tapsee is better looking than Kangana 😆

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Tapsee is better looking than Kangana 😆

😂 now this makes sense. You need to give your buddy a sense of humor. He's too uptight all the time😂

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

😂 do we really have to explain basics of debating? 😂 See, there's a difference between talking about celebs and talking about members. For example, we could say some celeb needs to be put away in a mental institution. But we couldn't say that about you, could we? Even if it were warranted 😉 😉 😉 That would be a personal attack.

I'm not sure where you get the idea celebs should be put in prison because you disagree with them as opposed to members of IF or general public. Tapsee should get equal protection as you or any other member of this forum.

It's not a matter of debate. Law is pretty clear on the point.

Now, if you're using *debating* to describe randomly mouthing off on a forum, even that usually calls for decency.

With re: that attack😆, IF has its rules. Humanity also has unwritten rules about decent behavior. Whether we cross the line depends on the individual. Supporting someone who calls for violence against others however crosses a line beyond indecent.

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

😂 now this makes sense. You need to give your buddy a sense of humor. He's too uptight all the time😂

Which buddy ?

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

1. It's called freedom of speech. She, you, and any other heads - dumb or otherwise - are free to say anything as long as it is not incitement, hate speech, or otherwise illegal.

2. Tax raid doesn't mean she actually did anything. Let them charge her. Even so, hypocrisy is not a punishable offense.

Kangana, OTOH, actually called for violence against groups. She stalked and harassed a man and his family. She used a dead man's tragedy to level accusations, which if unfounded, does leave her open to charges.

ie, what Tapsee did is political ideology which people may or may not like. It could be hypocrisy. If she is a tax cheat, she will get punished.

What Kangana did is criminal.

Conflating the two over political ideology is rather reprehensible as it minimizes the real threat to life and limb Kangana posed to people she found convenient to victimize. In other words: people could've died or been harmed or gone to prison without just cause because of her. Support of her criminality tars the supporter as well.

Maybe she put false rent receipts.

I see almost everyone do that 😆

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

I'm not sure where you get the idea celebs should be put in prison because you disagree with them as opposed to members of IF or general public. Tapsee should get equal protection as you or any other member of this forum.

It's not a matter of debate. Law is pretty clear on the point.

Now, if you're using *debating* to describe randomly mouthing off on a forum, even that usually calls for decency.

With re: that attack😆, IF has its rules. Humanity also has unwritten rules about decent behavior. Whether we cross the line depends on the individual. Supporting someone who calls for violence against others however crosses a line beyond indecent.

😂 I was giving an example that i was hoping even you would understand. That there's a difference between trashing celebs and trashing members. Never mind.😂

As for what is decent and what's not, well supporting someone who might be a tax cheat isnt very decent either. As for whether anything has been proven against taapsee, did you prove anyyhing against kangana? If so, how come she's free? Point is if we stopped you from mouthing off against celebs, you'd not have much to say here.