Originally posted by: mintyblue
I agree Ranveer is better in mainstream roles and maybe even has a better filmography ( debatable though) but Ranbir is a better actor.
He is one of the few actors who have mastered the skill of subtle acting and not the loud in-your-face kind of expressions or dialogue delivery. No other actor looks as good as him in close-up shots. The way he emotes is sheer perfection in lengthy close angle shots, with or without dialogues.
His screen presence is very dynamic. As per the need of the scene, he could stand apart in a crowd of hundreds and when required he could be totally not-in-focus with just handful of people.
He is not entirely a director's actor. He brings his only sensitivities and sensibilities to the character which is a double edged sword. Sometimes you need to trust the director 100% and just follow his visions on shaping the character. He did that in Bombay Velvet but unfortunately the film tanked.
What work for ranbeer is his looks and expressions. But his movie choices are not at all good for bringing the best of him. Like seriously what he was doing in movie Roy is still ???? . Ranveer has the subtleties of emotions in his expressions too in the character he played. I would like to see them both in the reverse type of roles they play. Like ranbeer as khilji and ranveer as in tamasha and Rockstar and also rocketsingh and I am sure ranveer will impress again but not sure ranbeer as khilji , how would he look ??? I will wait for shameshara and bramhastra for deciding that. Nonetheless both are very good actors.
19