A man may be a serial cheater and womanizer but as long as it's consensual, it isn't harassment.
This whole notion is tricky. We know for a fact that actresses have offered such services in return for roles and to have successful careers. It's their choice, hence, it isn't harassment. You can't go listing names without evidence. People here are ready to charge actors they dislike without any evidence. That's disgusting.
Scenario 1
Man: How about some action tonight, baby?
Woman: No.
Man: Well, think about it.
Woman: No.
Man walks away.
This isn't sexual harassment. The guy may be uncouth but that's another thing.
Scenario 2
Man: So what are you willing to do for the role?
Woman: I'll work hard. I will put my everything in it.
Man: Everything?
Woman: You heard me.
Man: Does everything mean flesh and bones?
Woman: Yes.
Man: I do enjoy some mango shakes and meat loaves.
Woman: And I like my meat hard.
Man: Then, let's go and enjoy a drink.
They walk away together and have consensual sex.
This isn't harassment either. It's immoral but not harassment. It doesn't matter if the man or women concerned is married. Cheating or extramarital affairs that are consensual is not harassment.
If a man goes and bashes a woman or his own girlfriend - or vice versa - it's physical abuse, not sexual harassment.
I fear this whole #MeToo movement will turn into a revenge saga or will be used to push agendas, hence, drowning the voices of real victims.
Edited by Karenina - 6 years ago
Pati Patni Aur Panga
Kumkum Bhagya
1