Tanushree dutta accuses nana patekar of harassing her on set. - Page 18

Originally posted by: Shreeti.sukor

She may have anxiety issues, she may have choices about acting bold scenes with selective actors, it's about one's comfort.

Moreover, every girl, be it a sex-worker, has a right to say "no". That's it.

Originally posted by: Shreeti.sukor

She may have anxiety issues, she may have choices about acting bold scenes with selective actors, it's about one's comfort.

Moreover, every girl, be it a sex-worker, has a right to say "no". That's it.

Originally posted by: Notafan

If a contract has been signed to do something, within legal limits, then you have to do it. If you don't want to do it, return the money and leave the film. It would be interesting to know if Dutta returned the money she received as remuneration .

Even most of the sex-workers might have those ethics(about this I don't know anything because I have never being with one)

Originally posted by: Notafan

But Dutta 'claims' that has happened. Nana Patekar has flatly refused it. There were people on the sets who did not see anything of that sort. One video that has come out shows that both Dutta and Patekar were quite cordial and smiling at each other.

She already knew it was am item song it was not a Bhajan. If she is comfortable being touched in a scene only by chocolate boys then she should not have signed up for this item song. She knew a male character was going to be in the song, she had rehearsed for it and who else it could be other than lead actor Nana Patekar.

Originally posted by: Notafan

Her bollywood career was already on it's last leg that is why she signed up for this film that too not as a lead but for an item song and she also lost that to Rakhi Sawant.

Sawant was a decent looking girl before all those surgeries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g72MjW4yluw

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

Completely agree. See, in this field, the boundaries and comfort level are not that defined. What may be comfortable to Rakhi or other costars of Nana Patekar may very well not be so for Tanushree. She wanted to change the dance steps and walked off. The producers could have changed it to make her comfortable. But, can she accuse her costar and choreographer with a crime as grave as Sexual Harassment because of that? The line is very thin but very important.

Originally posted by: Notafan

If a contract has been signed to do something, within legal limits, then you have to do it. If you don't want to do it, return the money and leave the film. It would be interesting to know if Dutta returned the money she received as remuneration .

Even most of the sex-workers might have those ethics(about this I don't know anything because I have never being with one)

Originally posted by: Notafan

Media Cameras are a costly thing, especially for freelancers. When you break a media-persons camera you are effectively taking away his/her livelihood. But I guess privileged lot does not get that.