Although people appreciate Kangana's honesty, they must not forget that she keeps giving contradicting statements in her interviews. We can easily find that out by watching her pre -Krish 3 and pre-queen release interviews where she constantly mentioned that she is single, praised Hrithik and Rakesh sir like no tomorrow, called Hrithik Mr. Goody two shoe, mentioned she doesn't believe in marriage, admitted that she was insecure to work with Roshans due to her short role in Kites, talked about her expectation of finding someone outside the industry, and finally admitted that she was offered Krish 3 by Rakesh Roshan in 2011. The reason why I am more inclined to believe Hrithik is that if there was a consensual affair, it would have left behind a trail in Kangana's phone and call records as well. However, in this case, it's only Hrithik who seems interested in obtaining his call records and his call records show only 35 to 40 messages and 4 calls made to Kangana in 7 years. In this day and age, there is no way that one's relationship will not leave behind a trail in his/her phone. Besides, a relationdhip of 7 years or even a year would show more than just 4 calls and 35 to 40 text messages. In this day and age you would have to do more than that to keep a relationship sustained. Ofcourse Kangana's claims (claims about knowing Hrithik's bad marriage status with Sussanne as claimed by a friend of hers as well as her on Aap Ki Adaalat) should be investigated and she should be given a benefit of doubt because if there was no personal equation then how did she know about what transpired between Hrithik and Sussanne behind closed doors? However, if she accuses someone of crimes such as hacking, defamation, and sending emails from her account with the intention to cause harm, then she must also get her devices checked by another private company. In addition she should also verify the IP address of those emails which were leaked from Hrithik's side. If it was indeed hacking, then the IP of those emails wouldn't have matched her IP address. Unfortunately when Kangana's lawyer was asked why Kangana isn't taking any action or trying to get her phone records out or get the IP of those emails verified, he said that his client isn't trying to prove anything but Hrithik is. If Kangana is that innocent and had an affair with Hrithik because of her impractical nature, then how is it possible that Rangoli who was her sister/manager at that point of time was oblivious about this relationship (which she herself admitted in her emails to Hrithik and requested Hrithik to help them file a police complaint). Moreover, if the emails were not written by her, then why did she cry for days after feeling naked? If anyone hacks a gmail account and sends himself emails, then the person who originally owns the account should receive notifications and Kangana did admit receiving notifications in the Barkha Dutt interview. If that was the case then why did she claim in her Rajeev Masand interview that she had no idea that she was part. of such a big scam? If anyone receives notifications that the account has been accessed by a different device, any normal and sane person would check the inbox and sent items by logging in to the account. Kangana said that Hrithik had her password and he kept sending emails to himself.Well, then why didn't she change her password after her breakup? Moreover,. why didn't she change it after receiving those notifications that her account has been accessed from elsewhere? Where was the naari shakti then? So my interpretation of this is entirely based on evidence and those emails if written by her, prove that there was no affair. Her speech for Reebok India proves that she indeed wrote those emails which are nothing but one-sided. If she had a fling or a casual affair with him, I don't think she would have written . things like, "baby when we start to date...the first time I saw you I felt...I thought you are the man for me...I wonder what will happen when you kiss by mouth..." These are signs of anticipation prior to physical intimacy. If there was an affair or a fling, these things wouldn't have been written in emails and there wouldn't have been so much of voyeuristic pleasure from Kangana's side after having had an affair or fling with him. Lastly, I don't think Suzanne and her family would have defended him to this extent (even though their display of affection can be deemed questionable) and he wouldn't have gone the legal way to send a notice for something that was consensual and was in the past. Most Bollywood men who have affairs usually don't send notices. Most of them just go silent once and for all and choose not to file any complaint or send a notice. Therefore, I believe that for this particular case Hrithik's claims (most of them) are more credible than Kangana's since most of them are backed by evidence.
Edited by rabees011 - 7 years ago
16