Kangana asks Hrithik 9 questions

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

hashey

@hashey

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: slumgod..

How can a DUMB (as per Kangu) person could hack her account?

His personality changes as per her mood, dumb, silly, sly, powerful, no talent, great hacker, depends only on papa's money, rich enough to buy all media what ever she whishes

Quote

Remus.Lupin4

@Remus.Lupin4

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: hashey

His personality changes as per her mood, dumb, silly, sly, powerful, no talent, great hacker, depends only on papa's money, rich enough to buy all media what ever she whishes

😆😆 I wish she gets help. She deserves better than this.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

anoosree

@anoosree

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Nova19
Wouldn't she have to submit proof if she charges him with hacking? Makes no sense.

IRONY...she claims Hrithik hacked her account and it is HIM who lodges complaint with the cyber cell FIRST and it is SHE who REFUSED to give her gadgets for investigation...can her lawyer explains this logic for us. Poor guy

Quote

263437

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: Madame_89

Amber Heard who documented Depp''s abuse was shamed for it. She's actually persona non grata in Hollywood now.

Angelina Jolie was recently accused of performing black magic on Brad to get him back.

So you see, woman still don't have it easy.

That's true. Women still have a tough time when filing complaints for various issues like stalking and harassment. People on here are making it sound like it is a cakewalk.

Quote

Kangoli

@Kangoli

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

#35

I miss good not so old days of Nepotism battle when Kangana thread used to accumulate 100s of likes. Where has those days gone? Where are those likes now. Just one like for fearless woman is simply not done.

Quote

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: Remus.Lupin4
Sharing family Doctor, but they are not even a family, so how will he know her health? There is doctor patient confidentiality.

Hrithik clearly does not care to know and ask about her good health to family doctor. It is weird how she assumes sharing family Doctor means he will care to know fully well about her health.

She thinks too much to ask for aim and object and intent. He does not care. He's just not that into you.

She probably only went to that doctor because he does. How does she even know who his doctor is, oh wait what am I saying 🤣

Quote

Justwatching

@Justwatching

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: Nova19
She probably only went to that doctor because he does. How does she even know who his doctor is, oh wait what am I saying🤣

She most likely went there disguised as a nurse in hopes of giving Hrithik a physical checkup 🤣

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#38

Mods please make one thread for all stuff on Kangana and Hrithik instead of multiple threads on same stuff.

Why the hell are their lawyers leaking questions, statements in public and making it a media circus instead of going to an actual court?

The whole way both parties are handling this issue it seems like a publicity stunt.

Who will answer these questions eh? Fans, journos, random people on FB and Twitter?! 😆

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

#39

My turn around questions for the questions asked by Kangana. Not trying to use "knowledge" (Sorry, I am not "Mr/Ms Know it all"). But only trying to use logic.

1) ... Under these circumstances why did he take any risk of slyly receiving, collecting and saving thousands of unverified emails on his personal email id from a hacked account, ...

I would like to know, when did the version change from "slyly pursuing" to "slyly receiving"?

2) Why did he fail to take the right step and instead kept meticulously collecting these( unverified and fabricated emails from a hacked account, instead of deleting them forthwith and reprimanding my client with full authority, if he had actually no guilt and had committed absolutely no wrong?

What do you think is the meaning of "retrieved from spam folder which was unopened?"

3) When my client was lending full co-operation

( How? )

on what grounds did he lie to the Police and only file an informal complaint instead of a FIR against an imposter, and that too without knowledge of my client, who was a concerned and interested party?

He did not lie, but he hid the name of the girl, thinking he should protect her dignity. Is that attitude wrong?

4.Why was it so important for Mr. Hrithik Roshan to wait for about 7 months and first collect thousand of all sorts of beneficial emails

Please refer to my comment for Question 2.

5. Mr. Hrithik Roshan only after receiving a strong reply notice, then seek to formally lodge a FIR after about 2 years against an imposter, and is now miserably trying to look for an imposter despite full knowledge that there never was any imposter in the first place

This is a new revelation. Was there never an imposter at the first place? Then what about the claims that Kangana received mails from him?

6.Why is Mr. Hrithik Roshan so desperately seeking to rely on a private and favorable forensic report which he has personally paid for?

That is because of the efficiency of cyber crime department in our country. If Kangana wanted, she could have gone and got a report too. Forget going for the forensic report, she did not not even submit her laptop and mobile to the cyber crime. Why?

7.My client andMr. Hrithik Roshan share the same family Doctor since many years and Mr. Hrithik Roshan knows fully well that my client does not suffer from any kind of mental ailments or syndromes whatsoever, then on what grounds did he circulate an unreliable and fabricated email to the media. What was the aim and object behind it?

Based on Rangoli's mails.

If the above statement of you is true, can I presume that, Kangana did what she did, being fully aware? (I will have to use the word manipulator then).

8.Besides my client states that no person would have under any circumstances circulated or shown to any third party (be it media or otherwise), any private pictures which were communicated by my client toMr. Hrithik Roshan during a relationship. Then on what grounds and on whose advice did he seek to openly outrage the modesty of my client?

Was he left with any other choice to protect himself?

9. My client demands to know that except for unreliable, fabricated and unverified emails whichMr.Hrithik Roshan is relying upon (and has never shown to my client till date), is there any other act of stalking that has been indulged in on the part of my client. If no then on what grounds is Mr. Hrithik Roshan claiming to be stalked by my client?

How many kind of acts should be carried out, before it is called stalking?

---

My last question to the lawyer. Are you doing any court work too, or just press releases?