Originally posted by: glace-bleue
You don't know if its a glorification or not...like I said in another thread that I don't mind the biopics of criminals as long as they are not glorified...may be SRK's character in Raees will die in the end like a villain...just like he died in DARR or Bazigar...If u have read any articles...it says SRK is playing a NEGATIVE role in Raees...toh jab negative hai toh glorification kahan se hua?? kuchh bhi
hahaha, funny this rule isn't applied to dutt. Here people are acting like they have read the script. WHy do u assume that dutt will be glorified? dying doesn't mean that itsn't glorified. if u show the character in good light throughout the movie and in the end he dies, its still glorifying. In this movie raju can also show sanju went to jail for his deeds but u would still call it glorifying.
to u it doesn't matter whether he did his crime or not, still a criminal and shouldn't be shown in good light. the same way if one dies after doing their crime, its still glorification.
negative characters can be glorified too. sanju's vaastav character is glorified its negative and dies in the end. heroes don't play negative characters where they're all bad. Even in baazigar his character was glorified wasn't it? they even justified him killing shilpa
but u wouldn't call that glorificaiton would u? oh poor him, look at what they did to his dad and took his money, he was just taking revenge, good guy, better shed some tears too on his dead 👏
6