SK Reacts To Kangana Ranauts: There Are Three Heroes In Rangoon - Page 2

Oh nice one Shahid...his quote can be interpreted both as pro-feminist as well as a dig at Kangana, depending on one's POV 😆

Originally posted by: ranikaadi

what a butt hurt loser. Kangana probably brings in more money than he probably will her will.

Originally posted by: dingle

Im fairly certain Pearl Harbor was based on Pearl Harbor not on the Indian Army


... eh? 🤣

i think that is the stupid reporter's comment ... "ikarmick"


anyways,
... Good one shahid 👏

Originally posted by: monu_tan

The MCP got butthurt.

i would rather call myself a heroine but dont want HER to call herself an hero .

Basically both are saying the same things in their own way..

i'll take it the other way ... i hate it when parents say about their daughters 'yeh toh mera beta hai' ... like being the beta is the cornerstone ... similarly why does KR want to be called the hero ? whats wrong/ demeaning of being the heroine ? ... heroine is not a synonym for useless 5 minute, 2 dance roles ... esp not today ..

The day Shahid Kapoor outwits you, isn't your day 😆

Phir se Hero-Heroine wala confusion man 😆 I liked what SK said though. Sometimes it's REALLY just a matter of gender 😎

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

Creating unnecessary rift.. 🥱

Kangana's comment on "3 HEROES" for Rangoon was a response to a whole different "HERO" question in the India Today interview by Rahul. She meant she had equal parts as the other male leads.

Both are saying the same thing and using the opposite "gender" to get their "inclusive" point across.

If anyone cares, go listen to the IV again. 😉

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Aren't you contradicting yourself? Does she have to call herself a 'hero' to prove that she has equal part as the other male leads? She could've used the word'protagonist' just like Shahid did if she finds the word 'heroine' demeaning...

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

Arrey Baba 🤡... Protagonist is the gender neutral word and appropriate one in this case.

All I am saying is that Rangoon example came up as part of the conversation on a different question. She was flowing with it... rather than giving the "legal" approved message and after thought what Shahid has.

Kudos to the article for achieving what it did. Clearly it worked for IF and they can over-analyze her quotes. 👏