Exclusive: Leaked Image Appears To Show Hrithik Roshan Embracing Kanga

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

-KissMyAss-

@-KissMyAss-

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#151

Originally posted by: pakeezah

how funny i feel the same where hrithik is concerned..look at him practising his dance moves 😆

Ok good for you but why are you telling me this ? 😆 I don't give a shit about his dance or him 😆 both him and Kangy are weird asf anyways but she seems more desperate and psychotic from what I've read so far 😆

Quote

Her-mion-e

@Her-mion-e

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#152

K3 pre production took 1 year to complete

The shooting took place from Dec 2011 to Jun 2012

So pre-production happened from Dec 2010 to Dec-2011

This said pic must have taken in 2011 since this is from pre-production party

Kangy came in Simi's most desirable show and talked about dating the doctor in September 2011.

So if this pic indicates HR and Kangy were having a fling in 2011 does it also imply she was two timing HR and that scientist?😕

and if this pic is from 2010 then where is Ajay Devgan fitting into Kangy's timeframe?

Ofcourse HR is lying when he says he doesn't know her at all but its hard to believe they were having affair in 2010-2011 which she herself never claimed earlier😲😲😲

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Eggon_Snow

@Eggon_Snow

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 9 years ago

#153

Originally posted by: anonymous39

And where did I mention a police complaint at all? I mentioned a legal case. Are you deliberately being obtuse?

No I am not being deliberately obtuse but I wonder if you are deliberately feigning ignorance because a legal notice is not a legal case. It is a notice informing the recipient of the sender's intention to take action. It can result in a case but it ain't technically one.

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/legal-notice-22889.asp#.Vx5kqTB97IU

Edited by gatheringstorm - 9 years ago

Quote

WadaPaav

@WadaPaav

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

#154

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

Yep, read the original notice from his lawyer.

🤣

2 min silence for HR stans trying so hard to defend their whitely coated demi god. 🤪

🥳 to HR getting flustered. 🤪

@pakeezah: everyone conveniently believes HR and Barbara affair yet there isn't a single pic of them as close as this one.

Yet million reasons are given why this pic isn't intimate.

RIP saintly act. 😆

Quote

WadaPaav

@WadaPaav

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

#155

Skimming through this thread was a divine pleasure.

The desperate attempts to prove how innocent and saintly HR continues.

I don't blame y'll.

It is mighty difficult to defend a narcissist who is obsessed with his streak clean image.

Regardless of what happens, HR can bid goodbye to his goody two shoes image.

Finally his real image is out for us to be amused.

And I am most definitely amused seeing his desperate attempts and even desperate measures to fool his supporters. 👍🏼

Quote

745671

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#156

Originally posted by: gatheringstorm

No I am not being deliberately obtuse but I wonder if you are deliberately feigning ignorance because a legal notice is not a legal case. It is a notice informing the recipient of the sender's intention to take action. It can result in a case but it ain't technically one.

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/legal-notice-22889.asp#.Vx5kqTB97IU

You were giving a lecture about a police notice, which was not even mentioned.

Hrithik initiated legal proceedings by filing a legal notice against Kangana for defaming him and lying about him being her ex. He threatened to release her personal emails (which he did release) and pictures. A legal notice generally means that the person will file a lawsuit against the person if they don't get what they're asking for. Hrithik wanted a public apology in a press conference.

He obviously didn't get that as Kangana filed a counter notice.

In any case, the burden of proof is always on the plaintiff aka the person initiating legal action which would be Hrithik in this disaster.

Neither one has proceeded to file an actual lawsuit which tells me both are lying in various ways and trying to call each other's bluff. All they're doing is playing with the media and hoping their stans stick up for them. It's obviously working better for Hrithik since he has a bigger fan base.

Edited by anonymous39 - 9 years ago

Quote

Purva

@purva

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#157

Ok the more I look at the pic more fake it looks to me 😕 I had some free time today and googled a bit..

HR's clothes and styling looks like his pic from Agneepath screening (release date Jan 2012)..

And KR's dress and styling looks like the one from Lamhaa screening (release date July 2010)..

Unless they both repeated their clothes with same styling.. that one sure is a morphed pic..

Quote

bigul

@bigul

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#158

Originally posted by: purva
Ok the more I look at the pic more fake it looks to me 😕 I had some free time today and googled a bit..

HR's clothes and styling looks like his pic from Agneepath screening (release date Jan 2012)..

And KR's dress and styling looks like the one from Lamhaa screening (release date July 2010)..

Unless they both repeated their clothes with same styling.. that one sure is a morphed pic..

thanks for posting this. i was trying to post two images. one is of srk and the other is of this bluedress one, but the pic was not appearing in the thread.😆