Is there anyone that can rival Hrithik? - Page 28

Originally posted by: R.K.O

emm only srk has done the phd in crying and hammming as far as i knw ,sallu dont cry he makes people cry 😆...aamir yup he is better then two khans but in crying i dont remember a movie except dill chahta hai which i really liked 😉

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

many people might say salman is better looking and aamir is a better actor, Ranbir has surpassed HR and many other stuffs.

But how many of them have the allrounder qualities in them ?

Please care to tell me, can Ranbir, Aamir play a Akbar or even a vijay chauhan, leave his other roles ?

But definitely Hrithik could play a barfii or bunny, and even Dhoom 3s double role blunder right ?

Yes salman is immenesly good looking, but HR has been considered a better looker always, look at the polls, infact HR is the only Asian to feature in the 100th most good looking men on earth by one of the reputed magazines in states i guess.

Plus HR has been always versatile, yes he never utilised his brand name and stardom to cash in on and do many films, but still whatever he has done has always been something challenging and different from his other roles, atleast he tried to maintain a balance.

He may not be as big as Khans, justified because he is much junior to them, but whatever he achieved in his age, the khans achieved that much later.

In bollywood, HR really has no competition, he has always been the one who has survived and dominated without anybody competing with him. infact only superstar of the last decade, and that too with so much less number of films.

and those who say he is an average actor, i respect their opinion, but saying that his dancing is average and bollywood has better dancers than him is a joke.

He is an ultimate combo of good looks, acting, dancing, aura, and screen presence with huge starpower, and very rare actors have that in India. and lastly, he does not thrive in any single image like SRK ( Rahul) or salman ( PREM).

and to the TM:- He is the only one who makes all the heroines look good with him, one more quality.😉

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

And your point is whaaat? Everyone else is bad so Hrithik (who is hamking himself) automatically becomes the best? 😆😆

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

This forum always has the tendency to elevate one person to superstardom and put down others.😆

Better or as good as a dancer as Hrithik - Shahid

Better than or as classically good looking as Hrithik - Arjun Rampal, Vidyut Jamwal

Better actor by a landslide- Ranbir.

Ab bolo.😆😆

The Bombay Times May 1 1997

Hard body, soft face
Foreign mag rates Salman as India's best looker

Mumbai : Critics dismissed his tear-jerking performances in Love, Hum Aapke Hain Kaun and Khamoshi and the media wrote him off as the brash star. Now suddenly, Salman Khan is hogging the limelight and acclaim has come from unusual quarters.
Only recently he was nominated by America's People magazine as India's "best looking actor". According to a poll conducted by the magazine among its readers, Salman has made it to the top of the good lookers list in India, beating contemporaries like Sanjay Dutt, Aamir Khan, Saif Ali Kahn, Anil Kapoor and Jackie Shroff.

"Drop dead good looks... straight Kodak material," the magazine says of Salman, describing to him as one of India's better actors "who has charmed his way into people's hearts with a sensitive performance in Khamoshi."

In addition, Salman has also made it to the seventh position on the magazine's list of Top Ten Good-Lookers of the World, only a few places behind the likes of Tom Cruse, Brad Pitt and Matthew McCaughney. "His is a perfect blend of a soft face and a hard body," the magazine says, justifying how the actor skyrocketed to Number Seven, beating Hollywood stars like Christian Slater, Antonio Banderas and Tom Hanks.

People also compares his "arrogant physique" to the chiselled bodies of Hollywood heavyweights Sylvester Stallone, Van Damme and Arnold Schwarzenegger and attributes his large fan following to his ability to perform mostly action scenes with such finesse as is seldom seen among Indian actors.

To top all this, Salman Khan was recently informed by the producers of the Oprah Winfrey Show that he had been voted the best-looking male in India, on the basis of a countrywide poll conducted by the organisers of the show. In addition, the producers have also invite him to be a special guest on the Oprah Show. If Salman does attend the show, he will, in all probability, be the first Indian to do so.

Salman was unavailable for comment as he is away in Singapore, for a series of stage shows. His sister, Alvira Agnihotri confirmed that "Salman did receive a letter from the Oprah Winfrey Show telling him that he was asked to appear on the show as a guest." She added, however, that "I have no idea whether Salman will appear on the show or not."

Meanwhile, Salman's directors are all praise for their good-looking here. Sanjay Bhansali who directed Salman in Khamoshi and will work with the actor again in his next film also starring Aishwarya Rai and Ajay Devgan, feels, "Salman is definitely among the best looking actors today." Bhansali who rates Dharmendra as the all-time best-looking Indian actor says that "Like Dharamji, Salman too, has that earthy look to his. Salman is a simple person, and I think he exudes that simplicity very beautifully."

The reason Salman looks so good, Bhansali explains, "is because he's a happy man at heart, and that happiness and contentment reflects on his face." Bhansali does add, however that "it's unfair to call Salman just a goodlooker, because he's a terrific actor too, who carries off even the toughest of scenes with grace."

And finally, for those wondering how Salman managed it to the top of the charts, here are the hunk's vital statistics: arms (biceps) 17 inches; chest 42 inches; waist 29 inches; hips 40 inches; thighs 23 inches. What more could your ask for?

Originally posted by: Debarati7

Absolutely..I forgot Vidyut...He is as good looking as Hrithik is..if not better..And Shahid is no doubts the better dancer..

And Ranbir toh is a better actor than Aamir/Shahrukh/Ajay..if we compare the current scenario..

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

@bold:- I am sorry, didnt SRK do asoka.. yes he was brilliant, but i doubt he could have pulled it off as well as HR did. but yes perception varies, and as we are fans of each of them, we are biased in our opinions.

No, you judged my post wrong, i did mention that HR is much behind the khans, and when did i say HR is the king or badshah? never, i said he is different in his league, and prettu much survived without any competition.

at the last 3 lines, well thats for you, you might think that none of his characters are worthy of being remembered, but in general people do remember akbar, krrish, aryan, rohit, ethan and the count could be more if HR's filmography would not have such less films.