Is there anyone that can rival Hrithik? - Page 15

Originally posted by: Saraa.

When did I said heroines have no contribution in flims? Of course they do but salman Srk are huge stars even if they work with seniors heroines that movie would be a Bb. It's a fact.

Older heroines get replace. They get married, some leave by themselves, some get replace by new heroines. But here we are talking about khans they have power to delivered blockbuster with and without heroines, chak de india was bb, wanted was a bb, dabbang was a bb and all these movies I mention had either no heroine or the heroine role was very less.

Khans need heroines good establish heroines to break records but their movie success is solely dependent on heroines, they can give superhit and BBS without heroines as well.

are we going to forget all the times when he overacts??

Hrithik is an all rounder.
IMO he's the BEST dancer in bollywood. No one comes close. He's also a good actor and good looking.(NOT the best looking but he is hot)
He doesn't do many films and keeps a low profile so that's one of the reasons why there is no crazy hype around him always. His PR team isn't as crazily active like others. He's a perfectionist and very hardworking overall.

Also, I have many friends who aren't desi who love and adore Hrithik, he does have a strong fan following. He's now just entering the big league (BO power wise) and has only been around for 14 years so it's unfair to compare him to the Khans who have been around for two whole decades.

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

What films have they been cast in with women almost in their 50's which have been box office hits.

I am intrigued and would like to know?

Originally posted by: Saraa.

None of the women's they started with are 50s. Madhuri is 46. If you're talking about present then they Were not paired with senior actresses but they are paired with less popular actresses.

Salman: Ayesha Takia who has zero star pull, Sonakshi Sinha who was newcomer, Asin who has zero star pull.

Shahrukh actually worked with kajol in my name is khan. My point is khans flims are not dependent solely on heroines, their flims are dependent on them, but I guess you're not getting my point but seriously who am I arguing with?

Either you're not too sensible to understand my point or you don't want to.

No...no one can rival Hritik...He has it all...he is the best dancer, best actor, looks like a Greek God and has amazing screen presence...almost all the superstars lack in some department but Hritik is just perfect...

Buahahahhahaha. One NAME Hrithik enuff to put all Khan fans join the hands hahahahahaha.

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

Buahahahhahaha. One NAME Hrithik enuff to put all Khan fans join the hands hahahahahaha.

The TM asked a simple who has all 3 qualities combined.. and damn, I think mostly for younger lot as srk is gonna look as good as Salman, Salman is no gonna be as good actor srk, srk is is gonna as good actor Aamir.. Dancing kya hai, yaar chhodo 😆😆😆

so many pages..

Looks- HR.. first film... a middle class Indian youth to metro foreign looker with biceps and tanned body with gelled hair and rimless glasses. well, ne need to talk abt Hithik mania.. Many syars have had HUGE debute but none was like this.. The film got some 102 awards.. 😲

But his looks doesnt end there.. Since KMG- 2 diff. looks, Lakhya- 3 diff. look (wig, cre cut and normal Hairstyle), Krrish- 2 diff. looks again.. with another thrown in as Rohit, D2- 7 diff. looks, the most amazing was that Budha cleaner, he can do fullfledged movie on that role/character, not to mention.. His roginal Greek God look... amongst others, Jodha Akbar.. one thin tache and costume.. herez ur Akabar-the gr8, Kites- again 2 looks, Guzarish- one look where he lookd loike Jesuse Christ 😆 ZNMD- normal NRI kewl looks, Agneepath- normal Indian evengful looks, K3- 3 diff. looks

And looks also need overall personality and that for men includes height and body too. Thats I praise Aamir for doing movies like Gulaam and Baazi and Srafarosh.. coz he did it w/o that personality. As for HR ... perfect screen presence!

so, howz that for just LOOKS. Tell me one actor or star who exp. as much as this guy LOOK wise and still be called Greek God.

Dance- well, what can we say.. hez slowing down and he wudnt dance in many of his films coz its not needed. Just play the character. Why do u wanna kame Akbar dances better than Jodhabai. The last time he danced like he can was Fire in ZNMB, waiting for Bang Bang thou.

Acting- Awards sux.. but those who blv in it.. when how many times HR was nominated and won best actor awads category in his 20 films? How many he was torn apart by Critics except for may be MPKDH,and may be AMALL, MDK??????? comapred to that how many time he was praised as the only saving grace of the film to "Watch it for Hrithik, ur paisa vasool".

As for public, they do expect some content from his movies, coz of his reputation. Nothing wrong in it. I wudnt wanna be in a place where I jump from one boat to anther saying "ey look, my star's movie was pathetic, his acting was pathetic still it was BB, so hez got the starpower" and next tiem "hey Look my star has given 4-5 of performances in 25 years, so he can act rightz?"

😆😆😆 HR's perf. from Knaph, Fiza, MK ... to KMG onwards speak for itself. Looks- Hez a Geek God who can play Shiva, Modern entertainer like BB and more period drama to come.

AS one member said here.. who isnt HR fan but more hater.. that "if HR wants he be numero uno no quetion but hez lazy, lack of motivation, too much himself". I say to that.. I also like him to make more movies, I respect his privacy and spare time as he wanna spend it.

Therz is only one HR... Khans r seniors, younder ones r Jrs.. NO need for comparisions, he has his own race track... where he beats himself

He's brilliant but he's definitely not the most versatile.