Satyagraha Reviews Topic - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

241

Views

24.9k

Users

54

Likes

252

Frequent Posters

MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: tomnjerry2

Friday, 30th August 12:30 PM IST


SATYAGRAHA Starts On Expected Lines


"Satyagraha" is another multi starrer political social drama from Prakash Jha which released today across 2650-2700 screens. Its a high budget wide spread release.




Film started on expected lines and occupancy was 35% - 45% across the board. Film was better in central India but overall film needs good growth from evening onwards in order to score big over the weekend.



Film has to perform well over the weekend and week one as next week will again see two big releases in "Zanjeer" and "Shuddh Desi Romance". Film should eye at least 40-45 cr nett weekend but at the moment 0 cr nett looks more realistic.




As per early trends, film should close around 7-8 cr nett on day one unless film shows dramatic growth in the evening. Anything close to 10 cr nett figure will be an ideal result.

🤣

MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#62
Film Review: Satyagraha is a bad script with good actors
Friday, Aug 30, 2013, 11:34 IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA
Sarita Tanwar




The film could have been so much more had it taken the Madras Cafe route and made an honest, hard-hitting film.
Film still

Rating: **1/2
Directed by: Prakash Jha
Starring: Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor Khan, Arjun Rampal, Manoj Bajpai and Amrita Rao



What it's about:
If you ask me if Satyagraha is based on Anna Hazare and his whole movement, I will have to say yes. Even though everyone connected to the film has denied that. There are just too many coincidences for me to call this film a work of fiction. Yes, large dollops of fictional elements have been added to the script but it's too easy to guess who is playing who here. Dadu's aka Dwarka Anand (Amitabh Bachchan) fight against corruption is no different from Anna's movement, then there is his 'deputy' Manu (Ajay Devgn) who could easily pass off as Arvind Kejriwal. The whole political scenario at that time, the support of the opposition, the police action, the participation of the youths, the maligning of the party members, the disillusionment of the public, and finally formation of the party...We witnessed all this not too long ago..

What's good:
Satyagraha has all the ingredients for a good film. A subject that is still fresh in people's minds, a big star cast, a huge budget, a big banner. Director Prakash Jha takes up the issues (corruption and dirty politicians) that plague this nation. There is enough anger/frustration amongst people, if Satyagraha's purpose was to reminds us that nothing changed even after the movement, the rallies and the noise on the social network, it succeeds. The film will make you angry and make you feel helpless, powerless...it's all too real.. too close home. Maybe that it the director's intention. Which is why he should have done this docudrama style. It would have been more effective and relevant. Drama and emotions are the director's strengths and he excels in the scenes between Dwarka-Manu, Dwarka-Sumi (Amrita Rao) Manu-Yasmin (Kareena Kapoor). Some times an actor lets a script down, at other times the script lets an actor down. Satyagraha belongs to the latter. It is laden by superb performances by it's cast. Ajay Devgn is in his comfort zone, yet another subdued and impactful performance but this role has a seen-that quality, Arjun Rampal and Manoj Bajpai are brilliant but it is Amitabh Bachchan who stays with you. Don't ever let this actor convince you he has already delivered his best performance. He just betters himself, and leaves you speechless and more than a little in awe. Kareena is sincere but let down by a poor role.

What's bad:


The thing that troubles me is: why make a fictional version of a subject like this? The only valid reason seems to be to not piss off the powers that be. To ensure a release. Admitting this is based on the Anna Hazare movement would have meant many hurdles. From political pressure to censor trouble to say the least. So director Prakash Jha choses to call this a drama/love story, thereby defeating the whole message/point of making a film like this. You can't make a film about what is wrong with the system, while surrendering to the system. It is a cop-out. Satyagraha could have been so much more had it taken the Madras Cafe route and made an honest, hard-hitting film. The bollywood-isation of the film is what ruins it. Another thing that jars in the film is Kareena's character. For some reason she is seen smiling through out the protests/rallies while filming them. Her hair is perfectly blow-dried, face too made up, which would have been fine had she been reading news in a studio, and not part of the ground team doing a report. But that is the least of my grouses with her character. She moves into the house of the person who she is covering, is seen on stage with them, becomes part of the movement...all while filing stories! A journalist can never do that. The reporting has to be unbiased, irrespective of the reporter's personal view on the subject. And which channel will allow one of their reporters/editors to openly align themselves to a campaign? What else is wrong? The songs. This film did not need songs. Certainly not actors lip-syncing them. The film begins with a song in which the item girl gyrating in bar dancer attire, the crowds are dressed in a trendy nightclub ensemble -- W*F moment.

What to do:
Watch it for Big B's performance. It would be a shame to miss that.
MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#63
Movie review: Satyagraha, what went wrong
Shubhra Gupta : New Delhi, Fri Aug 30 2013, 16:45 hrs



Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor Khan, Arjun Rampal, Manoj Bajpayee, Amrita Rao, Indraneil Sengupta

Director: Prakash Jha

The Indian Express rating: * 1/2


The trouble with cobbling together your film's plot from current headlines is glaringly evident in Satyagraha, Prakash Jha's latest take on What Ails The Nation. It becomes a case of putting on celluloid events that have just finished unfolding, and are still unravelling in front of our eyes: if it is happening in real life, why do we need a reel version? Especially a version which doesn't add anything of significance to the narrative: it's all been-here-seen-this-and-that before.

Mahatma Gandhi may have been the original satyagrahi, but two years ago, there was Anna Hazare, the man who threatened an indefinite fast unless the government agreed to his demands to enact a law against corruption. The image of Anna is still so strongly etched that even when Amitabh Bachchan channels the Mahatma (a classic scene has Bachchan drape his arms around two young girls and walk, in almost the same pose as the Mahatma did, all those decades ago), we instantly think of the man who colonised Jantar Mantar. And when we see Ajay Devgn, who plays Amitabh Bachchan's trusty lieutenant, we think of Arvind Kejriwal, the man who has broken away and formed his party against corruption, and which is readying to fight the elections in 2014.

There are other characters which Satyagraha borrows from real life: the image of a student setting himself afire is taken from the 1991 Mandal agitation; the too- tiny thread of an honest officer (a direct reference to the slain NHAI project director Satyendra Dubey) being bumped off when he becomes an embarrassment for the local administration is much more recent, but had an equally strong impact.

In a fictional North Indian town, there lives an engineer (Indraneil Sengupta, in a criminally brief role ) who wants to build roads and highways and do his bit for Bharat Nirmaan, and jumps in where angels fear to tread. We all know what happens to conscientious whistleblowers. That leaves his grieving Babuji Dwarka Anand (Amitabh Bachchan) and his anguished wife Sumitra (Amrita Rao) fighting the corrupt system as personified by corrupt neta Balram Singh (Manoj Bajpayee) and his cohorts, with the help of corporate shark-who-is-about-to-have-a-change-of-heart Manav (Ajay Devgn), local wannabe youth-leader-with-a-good-heart Arjun (Arjun Rampal), and feisty TV journalist Yasmin (Kareena Kapoor Khan). The film would have become interesting if the story had allowed for some nuance. If, for example, Amitabh's upright, moralistic Babuji had been shown to have some flaws, or Manoj Bajpayee's evil politician who is the chief villain, had been a little humanised, or if Sengupta's honest technocrat had been given a little more to do, Satyagraha would have had more heft. But then that would have made the fight between good versus evil a little complicated, and who wants complications in a film that serves up uni-dimensional characters who are barely disguised versions of real-life personalities in a story that embraces the simplistic with fervour?


MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#64
Satyagraha Movie Review : ''Kya ho raha hai yeh desh ka''!


Director : Prakash Jha
Music : Salim-Sulaiman, Aadesh Shrivastava and Meet Bros. Anjan Ankit
Lyrics : Prasoon Joshi
Starring : Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Arjun Rampal, Kareena Kapoor and Amrita Rao



August 30, 2013 04:25:23 PM IST
By Martin D'Souza, Glamsham Editorial


Prakash Jha seems to have taken the baton from Anna Hazare to ignite a spark of change (read revolution) from within the system. The director who is well-versed with the political games peels off a layer to expose the corrupt underbelly of politics.

SATYAGRAHA, his latest political offering, is based in Ambikapur, somewhere in India. Daduji (Amitabh Bachchan) is an upright man, working towards the upliftment of his village. His son is an engineer with the government and Maanav (Ajay Devgn) is his childhood friend. Maanav has dreams of making it big in the corporate world, wanting to start his own business and amass millions, which he does. Daduji does not quite like the greed with which Maanav goes about his dreams. Both have different ideals.

view SATYAGRAHA videos


A portion of the flyover on which Daduji's son is working collapses, killing a few laborers and injuring many others. Prima Facie, it appears to be an accident. But there are political dealings from the time the design has been approved to when the contract is given to a relative of the ruling Home Minister.

Before the dust can settle down from the flyover mishap, Daduji's son dies in an accident. The Rs 25 lakh promised by the government for the late engineer becomes a task for his widow to claim from the Collector's Office. Nothing moves here without a bribe. Daduji storms into the Collectors Office and when he is insulted, slaps the errant officer. He is imprisoned. This slap resounds throughout the nation.

CHECK OUT: Will Amitabh Bachchan's SATYAGRAHA create a revolution like Gandhiji?

The officer who got him arrested had failed to fathom the implications of his actions. A movement takes place to free daduji, spearheaded by Maanav and a rowdy student of Daduji who was once expelled from school, Arjun Rampal.

For a moment, you get sucked into the turbulence of what is happening on screen. Jha does not indulge in histrionics. All his characters are well etched. Daduji is a simple, ordinary citizen who only wants what is his right. Maanav, whose only link to a family is his friend killed in an accident, makes it his mission to bolster this cause, first with his millions, then with his principles.

Arjun Rampal as the youth leader stays on the periphery of the story line. Amrita Rao as the widow and Manoj Bajpayee as the bull-headed politician too top the list of protagonists. Add to it Kareena Kapoor as the political television journalist. Jha plays with his principal characters with guile.

Junta is the maalik and sarkar the naukar, says Daduji. A transparent system is what the movement is all about. Asking the government to give to the poor what is their due is not asking for much. Or is it? ''Kya ho raha hai yeh desh ka,'' Daduji silently mutters during his fast.





You would have witnessed what is brought alive on screen in small doses with your daily brush with authorities. The nation witnessed this when Anna Hazare 'fasted' against an inept system.

The bottom line or the message for the youth and the nation that Jha sends across is to fight the system from within the system. Root out corrupt politicians and join hands to build a better nation.

Good thought, it's the need of the hour. People's power cannot be underestimated.


Watching SATYAGRAHA fuels in you the desire to pray for a better tomorrow. To pray for better governance, for politicians with no criminal past and a government that is for the people.

It also fuels in you the desire to know what happened to Anna Hazare and later
Arvind Kejriwal. And this thinking is what makes you revisit the film in your mind and find a few loopholes in the script.

What Jha shows was witnessed on television by India and the world. What remains an intrigue is why the movement lost steam and where Hazare and Kejriwal are today? If Jha had to peel off another layer, SATYAGRAHA would have delved deeper into what every Indian wants to know today.

While the movie does invoke in you some feelings, you do feel cheated that it does not attempt to answer the bigger question.

Rating :
3/ 5 stars

Edited by BeShArAm - 12 years ago
MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#65
'Satyagraha' review: Prakash Jha offers nothing new
Khalid Mohamed | 3 hours 10 min ago





Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor, Manoj Bajpai

Director: Prakash Jha

Rating: Two stars

Meet Daduji of Ambikapur. A retired schoolteacher, he's mega-peeved when he catches his about-to-be-married son swigging a bit of booze. In fact, all hell breaks loose. And woe and behold, the son's drinking buddy is even banned from attending the wedding ceremony. A tad intolerant, isn't he, this Daduji?

But that's the way it is in Prakash Jha's Satyagraha', which hauls you back to the director-writer's favourite grazing ground: a smallish town brimming over with corruption, a crazy beggar called Transformer, a half-hearted item number, not to forget cavalcades of good ole Ambassador cars carrying an entire cosmos of ministerial baddies. Quite tyresome actually.

Come to think of it, you last saw the same self-righteous senior citizen, Daduji, combating the political Rasputins in Jha's Aarakshan'. Now he's back along with some cast alterations, to enact a story inspired by the Anna Hazare movement against cash grabbers. And there's a conscience stricken youngish man, too, spawned by Arvind Kejriwal, to rustle up some surrogate father-son emotional frisson.

As always politically, Jha's targets of attack remain obscure. The melodrama, as a result, is rooted in Ambikapur and its zillas, never to assume a national dimension. All that you can surmise is that Daduji and his supporters are pitched against the ruling state government, party ideology unclarified.

Indeed, confusion prevails as sarkari chambers and police chowkies proliferate with portraits of legendary Congress leaders. But wait, the word communal' is dropped jejunely, compounding your confusion. So who or what exactly is the System here?

At most, it is an abstract local governance, dominated by a wicked minister (Manoj Bajpai) and a Chief Minister (Anonymous) flanked by goons and ghouls aplenty.

How they snigger!

Incredibly enough, for decades Daduji (Amitabh Bachchan) and thousands of Ambikapurkars have tolerated oppression from such ghouls. Something's got to give, and it does. A satyagraha is sparked by the mysterious death of Daduji's son, who's run over by a truck on the highway. Boom! The township stirs into action. And what do you know? Manav (Ajay Degn), that drinking buddy re-enters, even giving up all his gazillions of wealth to look after the health of Daduji who's quite weary of it all by now. And so goes on an indefinite hunger strike. Tsk.

Moved to glycerine tears, TV news reporter Yasmin (Kareena Kapoor), also gives up her comforts, to become one of the poster-girls on the huge banners of political protest. For much-needed diversion, she also falls in love with Manav, but ticks him off whenever she disagrees with his bad calculations. Attagal, welikes.

As for Daduji's widowed daughter-in-law (Amrita Rao), she either cooks, weeps or darts grim reaction shots to the camera. And to complete the star package, Daduji's ex-student (Arjun Rampal), once a goon but now more luminous than a full moon, is on stand-by to galvanise a tweet-and-Facebook savvy youth morcha. Too much happening here and without pause or reflection.

The staging of the dramaturgy and the locations are strictly Prakash Jha: one sketchy event after another set in cozy cottages, busy boardrooms, and the town square where multitudes throng for the finale. The climax is somewhat of a cop-out " or pointless.

Truly, in some 140 minutes, Jha and his co-storywriter Anjum Rajabali tread the timetested path of corruption-bashing, without ever suggesting a way out of the morass.

If there is something of a resolution, it is only in terms of a dangling line of dialogue at the end. Suffice it to say, you leave, wondering whether Satyagraha is a defence of Hazare or a spectacle of sound and fury signifiying precious little. A pity.

Because Jha does strike up a believable relationship between the unbending Dadu and Manav, which is humane and moving. For sure, the best sequences in Satygraha, deal with the alterations of their mind-sets. And it's here that Amitabh Bachchan and Ajay Devgn, light up strong acting sparks. Of the rest of the crowded cast, Manoj Bajpai is bankably forceful. Kareena Kapoor is impressive despite the cliched role of an I-Pad flaunting journalist.

Come to think of it, throughout, the depiction of the media's role in political protests, is shallow. One solitary journalist is the protest's flag-bearer, while others inevitably ask dumb questions. And what does one do about the unintentional funny moments?

Like the journalist instructing her videographer to start shooting although he's already been at it with the camera. Or a chain of Buddhist monks suddenly crossing the field of the camera out of nowhere. Or the moment when the journo reads a book in pitch darkness, setting off a titter in the Inox auditorium on Friday morning.

Without a doubt, Prakash Jha -- a perennial political complaint box -- offers nothing new either by way of content or style. How you'd like insights and information, from him, which you don't know already. That would amount to excellent cinema, and not just one more star-fuelled trip into a political void.

Suggestion: avoid.

Movie review: Satyagraha thought provoking, but quickly loses charm

by Shiv Visvanathan Aug 30, 2013


Prakash Jha's Satyagraha creates a new genre of politics out of an old set of plots. The movie director who produced Damul, Gangajal, Apaharan and Mrityudand, Rajneeti, Aarakshan, and Chakravyuh continues his effort to capture contemporary Indian politics, its agents of change. The old game of sociological prediction which located agency in certain classes or communities is now doomed. Politics bursts into being at unpredictable points, with an unpredictable cast of actors.

The creation of myth for the movie is the murder of the idealistic IIT student Satyendra Dubey who protested against corruption in the Highways Authority. The young man fades into oblivion as his father and friend take over the struggle. As an epic movie Satyagraha can read in myriad ways, the most obvious is as a fictional rendition of the Hazare movement. The audience plays its own games equating Kejriwal's team and Jha's characters.

There is the father played by Amitabh Bachchan, who blossoms into a Anna Hazare like character. The actor who skyrocketed into fame as the angry young man of cinema becomes the epitome of non-violence: The angry old man of peace. It is an interesting twist to a cinematic career.



A still from the film, Satyagraha. Pic: satyagrahathefilm



Arvind Kejriwal is represented by a newly activist business man not averse to bribing on occasion. Shazia Ilmi and Kiran Bedi are here, as well, represented by a journalist who understands what social media is about and a policeman who finds his old corruption indigestible. We also have a lawyer who looks a tepid version of Prashant Bhushan.

But the equivalence game doesn't do justice to either reality or the movie, and quickly loses its charm. Realism is a burden that cinema finds difficult to bear, and creativity demands fiction goes beyond merely representing the facts.

Suddenly it is more than just corruption in a road project. It is corruption as a way of life and a grammar for living. The murdered man's widow attempts to get a compensation announced by the minister. She enters the labyrinth which involves everyone else in the battle. One woman's difficulty becomes everyone's battle. Bachchan slaps the Deputy Collector in an un-satyagrahic move and is arrested. That one act triggers the rest of the movement. The exemplar becomes the paradigm for the struggle.

Jha shows a certain realism. The struggle is of a new kind. Corruption is elaborate and it now needs a task force, a project team to undertake the battle. One suddenly realizes the new struggles are different. One cannot stereotype them or reduce them into socialist or Naxal archetypes. One needs a new skill set around information and media to fight these political battles. IT and media alter the old game of class struggle. And Jha is shrewd enough to understand and tap into that theme.

In Satyagraha, idealism does not always lead to revolution. The soul of the activist can brew in any person, irrespective of class. Puritanism in ideology or as archetype is no longer helpful. Sometimes ambitions alchemise into idealism. For example the journalist is only interested in events that make "history". She cannot initially believe that a little town in Bihar can be the site for the beginning of a significant movement. The businessman, in turn, entices her into covering the battle by inflating numbers in social media.

Jha also offers a similarly complicated view of the middle class, which produces the venal and the upwardly mobile and also the most impeccable of idealists. It's the unpredictable diversity of the middle class that makes it so fascinating. The corporate entrepreneur becomes the activist and the ideologist becomes the committee bureaucrat. Jha also shows that an idealistic middle class can be sensitive to suffering among other strata. It realizes it has to create a broader language of struggle, an amalgam of dialects to be truly representational.

Jha's Satyagraha struggles with the representation of non-violence whose ascetic rituals lack the seductive power of violence. Gun versus gun offers an easier resolution of drama and history. Non-violence does not emerge as a worldview but is represented by exemplars, in this case the patriarchal Bachchan, an old nationalist who remains the vector of change.

The one constant in a Prakash Jha film is the connivance and the agility of politicians. The politician and the bureaucrat are the two forces that the new India must fight to bring about justice and change. Contempt of the legislature or of court mark the beginning of a new era of protest.

Jha fictionalizes history by reworking the collage of reality and in doing so he produces a more powerful myth. The Hazare movement itself was finally serialized into banality and the struggle reached a quiet entropy. But in the movie, Jha synchronises the contradictions and tensions of the anti-corruption movement to create more powerful narrative. He does not produce a solution but leaves the future of the struggle open ended. Jha creates a contemporary fable combining myth and history, news and fiction to create a thought-provoking film.

Shiv Visvanathan is a social science nomad.


MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#66
Satyagraha review: Why Amitabh Bachchan can't save the deadly bore fest

by Piyasree Dasgupta Aug 30, 2013

Before anything else, I would like to take this opportunity to express my heartfelt gratitude to Prakash Jha. Henceforth, I shall walk on Mumbai's streets wearing a gas mask and will shun chewing gums, burgers, proximity to loud speakers, high heels or any such thing that threatens the beautiful gift of life. I might also be cajoled enough to have broccoli, whose place in my life was just a notch above Aditya Pancholi and vegan dahi till now. Because Satyagraha was indeed a life-changing experience " watching it was the closest I had come to dying from self-pity over bad choices made in life, of ear-drum scarring and of boredom. Yes, it was one of those occasions you realise boredom can be fatal.

Okay, now that I have gotten this important bit of acknowledgement out of my way, let's get to the film. Satyagraha is set in a small town called Ambikapur. You know, like small towns in Bollywood are. There's a chowk where a mad man with dreadlocks says clever things. Where boys and girls talk to each other from balconies, because, you know, talking on the phone is not small towney enough. Where schoolmasters are not human beings " they talk like mutants programmed to the preamble of India's Constitution.

In that village, corporate honcho Ajay Devgn arrives for the wedding of his childhood friend Akhilesh, a civil engineer employed with the government. The former wants all the corporate goodies while the latter wants to make great roads. The latter also has a nightmare of a father called Dwarka Anand. He the father we all have dreaded having " one who ticks off your friends, one who associates immorality of character with alcohol and oh god, one who speaks like he lives in a desh bachao street-play. So, Dwarka catches Manav (Devgn) plying sonny boy with alcohol and sends him packing. Now, Dwarka-Manav are officially as friendly as Shashi Tharoor and Narendra Modi.


Three years pass by and Devgn is spotted taking in the cleavages of various women " a white dancer in a posh Delhi bar who is strangely dressed in a skimpy ghagra choli and Mugdha Godse in a miss-before-you-can-blink role. The company of women generous with their necklines and a bunch of men, generous with their paunches, is supposed to establish that Manav is now a bad, bad corporate big shot. We're told he is planning to launch some mobile phone network. Sorry, we couldn't catch the name of the company because that's when Kareena Kapoor appears in the film. Kapoor is a bad ass journalist. She carries an iPad and thrusts it in the faces of corrupt ministers who she had caught doing unethical stuff on sting operations. She is as dreaded in the political circles as a railway strike is in Mumbai. And amid all that back breaking news reporting her hair doesn't stop looking less blow dried, less curled at the right places and less shampoo-ad gorgeous! How bad ass is that?

Akhilesh, on the other hand, was making great roads and flyovers enough to convince his father that at that rate, the country would beat China in development. Don't ask how building flyovers in one small town in Bihar gives a virulent idealist such an impression " that kind of idealism follows processes as secret as Rahul Gandhis speech writing sessions. It is not meant for the understanding of puny mortals.

However, tragedy strikes Ambikapur soon after. A flyover Akhilesh built collapses killing seven labourers and the engineer himself gets run over by a truck a day after. The local government announces a compensation of Rs 25 lakh. However, they forget their promise and Akhilesh' widow is left running pillar to post trying to get the compensation, with which she wants to open a school. One day, insulted by the district collector she returns home weeping. The father-in-law, in the true tradition of the fire-brand idealist walks to the district magistrate's office and greets him with one tight slap. Understandably, old man lands in jail. Manav comes running and after trying to hand wring the man's release, he launches a social campaign to release him. His tool? Social media. So there's a Facebook page seeking the release of Daduji'. Twitter campaign and ace journalist Yasmin (Kareena Kapoor) dumps an assignment to interview the Prime Minister and lands in Ambikapur to cover the revolution.

A lot of mind-numbing things follow. Daduji is released, the campaign against corruption gets bigger, and the whole of Ambikapur wants evil minister Balaram Singh (Manoj Vajpayee) out of their lives and this world. When it doesn't happen easily, Daduji, goes on a hunger-strike.

And all the while Daduji grovels his way through the ordeal, you wonder how he is still not dead. No, not because he is 70 and has had no food. But because there's this bunch of annoying kids who have stationed themselves in front of him singing something called Janta Rocks, Janta Talks'. I refrain from calling it a song, because Robin Thicke, Altaf Raza and Priyanka Chopra seem like valid singers after you've heard that thing. That thing sounds something like one neighbour screaming about another's dog taking a leak on his boundary wall. That thing sounds like a sales meeting where no one's met the target. That thing sounds like, yes, the Lok Sabha in its elements! How the frail, unfed seventy-year-old doesn't die from either that or the knowledge that the people around him are turning up in crisp colour coordinated Nehru jackets and shampooed, scrupulously styled hair while he suffers, is a mystery bigger than Amrita Rao's role in the film.

What is even more terrible than showing a public movement against the administration is one that is manipulated by one shrewd person is how juvenile it makes mass outrage look. And at times, completely hilarious. Because the participants in Jha's public movements are give dialogues that seem like answers to high school political science questions. You'd imagine from Jha's film that the country is only full of boys who have Swami Vivekanand's posters on their bedroom walls, and not Katrina Kaif's.

And ah, the acting. Ajay Devgn manages to look like he has severe stomach trouble through the film " when he is hurt, when he is angry, when he is about to have sex with a super hot woman. Kareena Kapoor pouts like she is in a Vivel ad and looks all around here with the amusement of an expat who has just seen a cow at a traffic signal. Amitabh Bachchan could have done this film in his sleep " seems like that's what he did.

Finally, Satyagraha is an exercise in extreme self obsession. Because Prakash Jha just doesn't want the film to end! It goes on and on till you start hallucinating Ajay Devgn's moustache as a sinister, blood sucking alien and Amitabh Bachchan starts looking like a mummified pharaoh.

P.S. The film has Arjun Rampal, fully clothed, hanging somewhere behind all the other things decidedly less good-looking than even his eyebrows are. And I almost forgot he was there. Imagine what film can make a woman, with the right amount of hormones, FORGET Arjun Rampal. Enough said.

🤣

MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#67
Satyagraha' review: A mission left unaccomplished
Tag: Satyagraha review, Satyagraha, Prakash Jha, Kareena Kapoor, Ajay Devgn, Amitabh Bachchan
Last Updated: Friday, August 30, 2013, 15:27

Resham Sengar



Prakash Jha's Satyagraha' is an honest endeavour to capture the wrongdoings of our statesmen by picking cues from recent social movements against the corruption. Clearly, there are flavours of the Anna Hazare revolution in the film. And although Jha manages to keep his production values high, he falls flat in making a solid impact.


Satyagraha' is a socio-political drama that shows what has gone wrong in our political system. Led by Gandhian values and a deep desire to contribute to the society where he lives, Dwarka Anand (Amitabh Bachchan) is the Angry Old Man' of the 21st century fighting tooth and nail against the many social injustices prevailing at large. His Gold medallist engineer son Akhilesh's (Indraneil Sen Gupta) mysterious death fans his cause further and he is joined by his widowed daughter-in-law Sumitra (Amrita Rao), his dead son's best friend Manav Raghvendra (Ajay Devgn), local goon turned social worker cum aspiring politician Arjun (Arjun Rampal), and a journalist Yasmin Ahmed (Kareena Kapoor). What starts as a small-scale protest against the power hungry corrupt, takes the shape of a giant revolution.

True, Satyagraha' aims to portray the plight of the common man in a just manner and shows how the vicious government tried to derail every movement posing a threat to its position. But strictly unwanted romance and lovemaking sequences featuring Ajay and Kareena, underdeveloped mutual bonding between the characters, and lack of a substantial script makes the film entertaining only in bits and somewhat uninspiring. Add to that, this Satyagraha' ends abruptly perhaps leaving scope for a sequel.

On the performance front, the trio of Manoj Bajpai, Ajay Devgn and Amitabh Bachchan seem to fit well into the shoes of their respective characters for a fact that they have been there and done that earlier too. Remember Aarakshan', Rajneeti', Gangajal'? But it is Manoj Bajpai who gets the brownie points for justifying his character of a comic-villain commendably and the delivery of some very well written sarcasm by him is quite entertaining. Amrita Rao's character barely has any weightage and she is unconvincing in most of the emotional scenes. Kareena Kapoor rules the frame whenever she appears on-screen. But again, her scope of performance is just limited to mouthing a few important' dialogues and being present in crucial scenes like any leading lady. There is not much to say about Arjun Rampal role except that he had made most of what he had been given to do but it doesn't stand out.

Music wise, Raske bhare tore naina' rendered by Shafqat Amanat Ali is the song that shines in the soundtrack. Otherwise Prasoon Joshi's music does no justice to the film at all.

Jha's Satyagraha' depicts how the road to freedom from the vile and corrupt government is long and not an easy one. But the audience already knows that. Unfortunately, the attempt to show this on screen is rather underwhelming.
Perhaps, we can pin some hopes with the sequel that is if there is one in the pipeline.

Rating: 2/5


MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#68
Satyagraha and the 10 things it taught me

by Deepanjana Pal Aug 30, 2013


11 Comments
Email
Print

Prakash Jha's latest attempt at setting the national conscience on fire is Satyagraha. Amitabh Bachchan plays Dwarka Anand, aka Daduji, a small-town school teacher whose excellent diction and ability to slap inspires people of the fictional Ambikapur to revolt against the corruption of the bureaucracy and politicians.

Daduji launches the Jana Satyagraha, a people's movement that seeks to remind the political establishment that they are supposed to be serving the nation, not ravaging it. Daduji inspires a billionaire named Manav Raghavendra (Ajay Devgn) to give up his Rs 613-crore telecom business for Jana Satyagraha and ABP News to throw journalistic objectivity to the winds by letting its investigative reporter Yasmin Ahmed (Kareena Kapoor) become part of Jana Satyagraha while covering it as a journalist.

Daduji is also the guiding light for local youth leader' Arjun Singh (Arjun Rampal), whose role in Satyagraha is to look yummy, pump his fist in the air repeatedly and face water cannons. It's a damn shame Arjun doesn't wear prone-to-transparency white cotton while participating in the wet-kurta parade, sorry, protest march.

Satyagraha is supposed to be a political thriller, but it has barely any actual politics and it has absolutely no thrills. It is, however, a 153-minute long lecture on the state of the nation. Being a diligent student, I've made a list of the top 10 lessons in Satyagraha.

1. India Gate is a brand of rice whose packets are easy to cut and the rice takes very little time to cook.

2. Rupa banians (vests), particularly when worn by the owner of a scooter, could get you killed.

3. Bridges collapse when they're not built with Ultratech cement.



A still from the film Satygraha. image courtesy: Ibnlive



4. The government isn't the only one to follow a five-year plan. Billionaires in the making work in similar fashion, like young Manav Raghavendra whose projection for his own career goes like this: "Five hundred million in five years. One billion in 10." Currency unspecified, which is wise given the present economic climate. This way, if nothing works out, Manav can convert his INR to five million Vietnamese dong, Indonesian rupiah or Zimbabwean dollars and still meet his targets.

5. Billionaires conduct business negotiations in discos.

6. Women journalists, particularly those who work in television news like Yasmin Ahmed, must have the following (listed in order of importance):

- smudge-proof kajal

- a wind-machine that ensures their tresses frame their face perfectly,

- complete faith in Facebook and an unwavering belief that social media does not lie

- scarves.

7. What journalists do not have to bother with:

- deadlines

- actually reporting a story

- maintaining any distance, emotional or professional, from sources.

8. The more snazzily a politician is dressed, the more villainous he is. Trust the safari suit over the brightly-coloured silk kurta, black Nehru jacket notwithstanding.

9. In small town India, you can always find a microphone connected to a power source and speakers, no matter where you are. Consequently, if someone you love is angry with you and doesn't let you into their home, you can go to the serendipitously-located mic, give a speech and thereby force them and the entire mohalla hear you out. It's a two-in-one: apology-cum-press conference. Woohoo!

10. The Anna Hazare camp must be truly desperate for publicity to suggest they've inspired an unholy mess like Satyagraha. Especially since it comes up with perhaps the worst slogan ever (presumably to mirror "I am Anna") " "Janta Talks, Janta Rocks". Janta also walks, out of the film.


MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#69

Itne reviews me se mujhe sirf ek positive mila 😛

TOI and BOC had raised my hopes

Now they are just drowning

briahna thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#70
Friday, Aug 30, 2013, 11:34 IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA
  • The film could have been so much more had it taken the Madras Cafe route and made an honest, hard-hitting film.

    Film still

    Rating: **1/2
    Directed by: Prakash Jha
    Starring:
    Amitabh Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor Khan, Arjun Rampal, Manoj Bajpai and Amrita Rao

    What it's about:
    If you ask me if Satyagraha is based on Anna Hazare and his whole movement, I will have to say yes. Even though everyone connected to the film has denied that. There are just too many coincidences for me to call this film a work of fiction. Yes, large dollops of fictional elements have been added to the script but it's too easy to guess who is playing who here. Dadu's aka Dwarka Anand (Amitabh Bachchan) fight against corruption is no different from Anna's movement, then there is his 'deputy' Manu (Ajay Devgn) who could easily pass off as Arvind Kejriwal. The whole political scenario at that time, the support of the opposition, the police action, the participation of the youths, the maligning of the party members, the disillusionment of the public, and finally formation of the party...We witnessed all this not too long ago..

    What's good:
    Satyagraha has all the ingredients for a good film. A subject that is still fresh in people's minds, a big star cast, a huge budget, a big banner. Director Prakash Jha takes up the issues (corruption and dirty politicians) that plague this nation. There is enough anger/frustration amongst people, if Satyagraha's purpose was to reminds us that nothing changed even after the movement, the rallies and the noise on the social network, it succeeds. The film will make you angry and make you feel helpless, powerless...it's all too real.. too close home. Maybe that it the director's intention. Which is why he should have done this docudrama style. It would have been more effective and relevant. Drama and emotions are the director's strengths and he excels in the scenes between Dwarka-Manu, Dwarka-Sumi (Amrita Rao) Manu-Yasmin (Kareena Kapoor). Some times an actor lets a script down, at other times the script lets an actor down. Satyagraha belongs to the latter. It is laden by superb performances by it's cast. Ajay Devgn is in his comfort zone, yet another subdued and impactful performance but this role has a seen-that quality, Arjun Rampal and Manoj Bajpai are brilliant but it is Amitabh Bachchan who stays with you. Don't ever let this actor convince you he has already delivered his best performance. He just betters himself, and leaves you speechless and more than a little in awe. Kareena is sincere but let down by a poor role.

    What's bad:
    The thing that troubles me is: why make a fictional version of a subject like this? The only valid reason seems to be to not piss off the powers that be. To ensure a release. Admitting this is based on the Anna Hazare movement would have meant many hurdles. From political pressure to censor trouble to say the least. So director Prakash Jha choses to call this a drama/love story, thereby defeating the whole message/point of making a film like this. You can't make a film about what is wrong with the system, while surrendering to the system. It is a cop-out. Satyagraha could have been so much more had it taken the Madras Cafe route and made an honest, hard-hitting film. The bollywood-isation of the film is what ruins it. Another thing that jars in the film is Kareena's character. For some reason she is seen smiling through out the protests/rallies while filming them. Her hair is perfectly blow-dried, face too made up, which would have been fine had she been reading news in a studio, and not part of the ground team doing a report. But that is the least of my grouses with her character. She moves into the house of the person who she is covering, is seen on stage with them, becomes part of the movement...all while filing stories! A journalist can never do that. The reporting has to be unbiased, irrespective of the reporter's personal view on the subject. And which channel will allow one of their reporters/editors to openly align themselves to a campaign? What else is wrong? The songs. This film did not need songs. Certainly not actors lip-syncing them. The film begins with a song in which the item girl gyrating in bar dancer attire, the crowds are dressed in a trendy nightclub ensemble -- W*F moment.

    What to do:
    Watch it for Big B's performance. It would be a shame to miss that.

  • Edited by briahna - 12 years ago

    Related Topics

    Bollywood Thumbnail

    Posted by: Maroonporsche

    1 months ago

    Bollywood Thumbnail

    Posted by: oyebollywood

    1 months ago

    Dhadak 2 - Reviews And Box Office

    https://x.com/UmairSandu/status/1950399005738901818

    https://x.com/UmairSandu/status/1950399005738901818
    Expand ▼
    Bollywood Thumbnail

    Posted by: priya185

    1 months ago

    Sarzameen reviews- Kajol and Ibrahim

    Sarzameen reviews- Kajol and Ibrahim Released on hotstar 25/7

    Expand ▼
    Bollywood Thumbnail

    Posted by: oyebollywood

    26 days ago

    Zora - Reviews And Box Office

    https://jay-ho.com/zora-a-mesmerizing-murder-masterpiece-that-will-leave-you-breathless/

    Expand ▼
    Bollywood Thumbnail

    Posted by: oyebollywood

    1 months ago

    The Bengal Files - Reviews

    https://x.com/vivekagnihotri/status/1946940660067803443

    https://x.com/vivekagnihotri/status/1946940660067803443
    Expand ▼
    Top

    Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

    Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

    Add to Home Screen!

    Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".