How is it possible for her to be

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

835874

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: desigal90
I've checked all links.
News of Sara supposed debuting broke out last year 2012.
And all sites reported her as 16.
I'm sure one of them would have caught the lie if her age was off.
You can hardly hide age of star kids anymore.
She must be 17/18 now.

there are reports and magazine of Saif turning a father in 1993/4. Are you trying to claim those are untrue?

Or the other reports that stated her age as 16 back n 2010.

Sara was born in either 1993/4 anything else is a lie Saif knows it and God knows it to.

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

She wasn't born in 1993, she's 1994.
Which means she turned 18 last year September.
I've looked through links, don't see Saif and Amrita mentioning her age. All Amrita said was that her daughter was a teenager. Which she is right. Before Sept 2012, Sara WAS 17 yrs old, when news broke out of her supposed debut.

Either way, none of her parents have said she was 16.
Tabloids implied, another matter altogether.
Why would Amrita's PR be working with Saif's? Why would thy bother doing this when all is on record? Seems like tabloids were a year off. Called her 16 instead of 17. Doesn't seem like a conspiracy to me, more miscalculation.

Edited by desigal90 - 12 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

835874

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

fact still remains she is still nearly 19 not 16. Of course they d work together especially if she's gonna join the industry this is bollywood we are talking about. the younger they pass her off the better for her.

Edited by KaranPsbakht - 12 years ago

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#14

Neither said she's 16.
Again, I doubt their PR would bother hiding her age when all is on record. Tabloids are just lazy and recycling articles from last war that reported her as 16.
Like I said, even last year they were only a year off. Miscalculation.
Kinda like what you did in this topic. Made her 1993 instead of 1994. Said she's 19/20 rather than 18.
And you actually bothered to calculate, tabloids don't bother with such petty facts. They're main thing is sensationslism.
Last year when Amrita clarified, Sara was 17.

Quote

835874

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#15

and by passing her off as 16 it helps Saif's image too as it takes away from his ''budha image'' of having adult children, stating Saif has a sweet 16 y.o. daughter sounds way better than stating his daughter is on the verge of turning 19/20.

Most ppl think of Saif as some 50 year old, albeit him only being 10 years older than Kareena.

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#16

It's independent if his kids age though.
Sonam debut but Anil is still getting lead roles with young girls.
Him being called "Kareena's uncle" "Buddha" and the likes is not coz of Sara but coz of people's own perception of him being an actor for ages, perception that Kareena is a younger generation than his, not being likeable, etc etc.
The age so jokes existed even before people realized how much Sara's grown. It's in their perception of Saif

Edited by desigal90 - 12 years ago

Quote

1 2

How is it possible for her to be - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics