why no one is launching Namarta Ahuja ?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

TheRager

@TheRager

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

Starkids dont get free lunches. Mostly their movies are sponsored by their parents. Maybe Narmada's parents dont have 10-20 cr to spare for her debut.

Quote

453365

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

Govinda has no pull, no good will, no money and no production house. 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila
Narmada is 24 or 25. The age of star daughter debutantes is getting younger and younger by the year. She has already passed her prime according to Bollywood's unspoken sexist ways. So I doubt she will make a substantial debut anytime soon.

Completely wrong.

The age of a heroine debuting is definitely not getting younger. Back in the 60s, 70s 80s, the likes of Rekha, Sridevi, Padmini were debuting at around 15.

In the early 90s we had the likes of Kajol, Karisma, Shilpa, Raveena, Pooja, Ayesha, Manisha, Urmila - all debuting while teens! 16-19.

Now it's different, Vidya debuted aged 27. Even the younger ones Deepika, Asin, Sonam, Anushka all debuted in their 20s.

😉

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: Bollywood_Divas

Completely wrong.

The age of a heroine debuting is definitely not getting younger. Back in the 60s, 70s 80s, the likes of Rekha, Sridevi, Padmini were debuting at around 15.

In the early 90s we had the likes of Kajol, Karisma, Shilpa, Raveena, Pooja, Ayesha, Manisha, Urmila - all debuting while teens! 16-19.

Now it's different, Vidya debuted aged 27. Even the younger ones Deepika, Asin, Sonam, Anushka all debuted in their 20s.

😉

I don't know what happened in the 50s,60s,70s. I'm talking about now. Alia, Anuskha, Sonakshi, Deepika, Sonam (relevant heroines of this era) all made their debuts with top heroes/production houses when they were younger than Narmada's age (which is blasphemous because she is young herself). Of course she can and will probably debut, still. But will these top buddha heroes or top production houses choose to work with her? That is the question.

Quote

d-_-b

@d-_-b

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#15

I would be happy if Ragini Khanna is launched in a movie than Namrata. Ragini is much more prettier than her cousin and really knows how to act.

Quote

shalini1323

@shalini1323

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

I don't know what happened in the 50s,60s,70s. I'm talking about now. Alia, Anuskha, Sonakshi, Deepika, Sonam (relevant heroines of this era) all made their debuts with top heroes/production houses when they were younger than Narmada's age (which is blasphemous because she is young herself). Of course she can and will probably debut, still. But will these top buddha heroes or top production houses choose to work with her? That is the question.

Alia is a kid seriously ... 🤪 she looks like 16 to me but actresses like Yami Gautam, Richa Chadda, Chitrangada, Ileana Esha gupta all debuted in hindi films post 25. Hell even Sunny Leone & Nargis Fakhri are 30 + and the Murder 2 girl Aditi Rao Hyadri is 34 ... I really don't think it's a big issue if one is above 25 or something ... Of course Narmada will probably miss out on certain roles (student of the year shanaya types) but if she's talented like her dad, then she might do well? And it's so common to lie in Bollywood abt your age. The moment she debuts she can go around saying she's only 21 or 22.. I am sure she will. 😆 Besides, apart from Alia.. neither Anushka nor Sonakshi, Sonam looked like an innocent 19 year old thing ... They could have easily passed off as 25-27ish ... 😕

Oh and about the top buddha heroes ... 😆😆 MMMHH ... maybe she might debut with Ranbir? Speaking of which ... Ranbir's Besharam heroine Pallavi Sharda is 27 too !

Edited by shalini1323 - 12 years ago

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: shalini1323

Alia is a kid seriously ... 🤪 she looks like 16 to me but actresses like Yami Gautam, Richa Chadda, Chitrangada, Ileana Esha gupta all debuted in hindi films post 25. Hell even Sunny Leone & Nargis Fakhri are 30 + and the Murder 2 girl Aditi Rao Hyadri is 34 ... I really don't think it's a big issue if one is above 25 or something ... Of course Narmada will probably miss out on certain roles (student of the year shanaya types) but if she's talented like her dad, then she might do well? And it's so common to lie in Bollywood abt your age. The moment she debuts she can go around saying she's only 21 or 22.. I am sure she will. 😆 Besides, apart from Alia.. neither Anushka nor Sonakshi, Sonam looked like an innocent 19 year old thing ... They could have easily passed off as 25-27ish ... 😕

Oh and about the top buddha heroes ... 😆😆 MMMHH ... maybe she might debut with Ranbir? Speaking of which ... Ranbir's Besharam heroine Pallavi Sharda is 27 too !

I agree with you but none of the actresses you listed are star daughters. You get my drift? Sonakshi, Sonam, Alia were all younger than Narmada when they made their debuts with heroes or production houses that carry a lot of clout. So I don't know about anyone else but I'm sticking with my theory as much as I'd like it to not be true. 😆

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#18

I don't think Narmada has no beauty. She looks pretty in pics online. If make up is done right she'll look fine.

Her pics and interviews have been appearing in media since last 4 years that means they are trying to get attention of producers.

I feel it's got more to do with Govinda's lack of clout in industry. Or maybe the girl is not talented enough?

Govinda is also rather conservative about what her daughter should do and what not. Shatrughan Sinha was also conscious and strict but they did allow Sonakshi to expose her back (in plenty!) in films.

Maybe Govinda's being too nosy and controlling what her daughter should do and what not and that's what is preventing people from signing her?

I agree that Govinda's niece Ragini Khanna is much better and has proven her talent too. She did a movie called Teen thay bhai which flopped (it was a small film anyway). Bollywood should take notice of her.

I doubt Narmada's age. She cannot be 25. In 1999, in a Stardust interview, Govinda had said "My daughter Narmada is 15".
So how come she is 25 now? Either that magazine did a printing mistake back then or Govinda & Co. are lying now!

Why bring Salman here? Usne theka le rakha hai sabke bachche launch karne ka?

I think the girl should have tried TV than waiting for "right launch".

That Tiger Shroff looks ugly. He comes across as gay despite that so called physique he has built. He's not a patch on his dad! Jackie Shroff used to look so rugged and manly when he was young!

Sunny Deol's son is also outright ugly (that horrible nose!). Maybe after rhinoplasty he wil look bearable.

Both dads are in for difficult time. Boys better be talented or else they are not even fit to appear in TV serials!

Quote

Priyanka

@hiddenstar

Stunner

Posted: 12 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: LadyDabangg
^^ agar bal aur lamba karde toh boom wali katrina lagega🤢

EPIC!!🤣

Quote

grounder

@grounder

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#20

I think she is just plain lazy like her dad. He was famous for arriving late at the film sets and also just a look at his chubby body makes me feel that he doesn't even bothers to go for a walk, just eats and sleeps. So, maybe she is also not that competitive and is passive and taking her time to see if something good comes her way instead of actively trying hard to find something that she wants to work on. Don't know why most of these starkids wait for a mega-budget hugely publicized launch. We do have some good small budget movies being made in bollywood. If someone is ready to work hard, they can try to find some good script and role to debut with.