will ask Governor to pardon SANJAY D : Jaya Baccha - Page 3

Originally posted by: bwtsweetu

I hopre arjun kapoor goes to jail coz he is ugly and mannerless🤢

Originally posted by: bwtsweetu

I hopre arjun kapoor goes to jail coz he is ugly and mannerless🤢

Bollywood superstar Salman Khan, who is facing various court cases like hit-and-run and blackbuck poaching case, has decided to get married and have kids as soon as possible.

He took this decision after Justice Katju wrote to Maharashtra governor requesting him to pardon Sanjay Dutt, who has been sentenced to five years in jail by the Supreme Court of India.

In his letter, Katju pointed out that Sanjay Dut was married and had got little children, hence he should be pardoned.

"Salman had always feared that he might get astringent punishment in one of the cases, but he saw a ray of hope when Katju wrote that letter. He went through the letter to find out what all it needs to be eligible for being pardoned despite a SC ruling," a close aide of Salman told Faking News.

Katju has listed six points why Sanjay Dutt should be pardoned, and Salman found that he fulfilled five out of those six criteria.

The first reason cited by Katju was that the incident was old and Sanjay Dutt had suffered a lot during the period, such as going to court often and facing professional problems. Salman too had been doing the rounds of courts and thinks he has suffered a lot.

The second reason cited by Katju pointed out that Sanjay Dutt had already spent some time in jail. Ditto with Salman Khan.

In his fourth point, Katju argues that Sanjay Dutt was not a terrorist; similarly Salman Khan was not a drunk truck driver killing people or an illegal poacher making bucks by killing bucks.

The fifth point put forward by Katju argued that Sanjay Dutt's parents were good people and had done a lot for the society. Salman scored even here as his father Salim Khan had written the story and dialogs of wonderful movies like Sholay, which helped the Indian society grow and mature.

The sixth and final point mentioned by Justice Katju hinted towards the movie Lage Raho Munnabhai starring Sanjay Dutt, which revived the memory and the message of Gandhiji.

"Well, even Salman Bhai has done movies like Dabangg, which spreads the message of victory of good over evil, and socially responsible movies like Bodyguard, which spreads the message of equality between people despite a person doing menial job – something even Gandhiji said," the close aide of Salman Khan argued why Sallu bhai was similar to Sanju baba.

"The only point not matching is the third one, where Katju cites Sanjay Dutt being married and having children. Bhai will soon marry and solve this problem," the aide confirmed.

http://www.fakingnews.com/2013/03/salman-khan-to-marry-and-have-kids-to-impress-justice-katju/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fakingnews+(Faking+News)

Originally posted by: Raisins

Katju and Jaya!!! 🤪

Originally posted by: Yuvika_15

^^i don't believe that article...for someone that's always said he would only marry when he feels in his heart tht its right, is less likely to go ahead and marry 4 the wrong reasons😕... i'd rather believe the statement onlyIF and when it comes from his own mouth...

i don't think any1 should interfere in the matters of law...this punishment will set an example tht no matter hw big person u r if u do wrong u r punished... plus sanjay himself is willing to serve the sentence so others shouldn't reali interfere...

Originally posted by: lmfao1

Yuvika that article is by "fakingnews" (on twitter I think), it's a joke, not a serious article. 😆

Sanjay Dutt and Bollywood's blinkers

Talking about Mel Gibson -- that wonderful Hollywood star who gave us Mad Max, Lethal Weapon, Braveheart, Tequila Sunrise, The Year of Living Dangerously -- after his anti-Jewish rant during an impaired driving bust-up in Malibu, the The Los Angeles Times in an article on August 20, 2006 called for the American film industry to declare the actor 'celebrity non grata'. It hoped that Hollywood would turn its back on him and keep him off the screen.

Mel Gibson, the paper said, "broke one of Hollywood's most sacred rules -- never let the public see what you're really like -- proving himself to be a megalomaniacal, sexist anti-Semite. This should disqualify him from being held up as a role model…" California's largest paper in a biting and angry commentary went on to say that the man, 50 years old then – roughly about Sanjay Dutt's age now – should be "left to wrestle with his own demons in private, as most other bigoted people get to do." Gibson's life and career haven't been the same since that time. There aren't directors outside his door or pretty groupies inside.

And Gibson was not even carrying an automatic gun designed to mow people down. Neither was he accused of hobnobbing with underworld gangsters openly waging a war against the country. Sanjay Dutt was.

Ibrahim Musa, one of Dawood's henchmen tasked with the destruction of Mumbai, later told cops that a part of the arms consignment that triggered off the deadly 1993 serial blast which would eventually kill 257 people and injure 713 others had indeed found its way to Dutt's house. Three AK-56 rifles, cartridges, 25 hand grenades and a 9-mm semi-automatic pistol were removed from the van carrying the weapons and given to the actor for safekeeping.

Earlier, in 2002, a Special Court in Mumbai heard a 45-minute tape which had Dutt and his friends -- Harish Sugandh, Sanjay Gupta and Mahesh Manjrekar – purportedly talking to mobster Chhota Shakeel in Karachi on a range of subjects, from business in the movies to actresses in need of money, from a request for a script based on the don's life to upcoming actors who were cheeky and perhaps needed some pat-down. Bizarrely, this was after he had been censured and punished with a jail stint for his links with the likes of Abu Salem and the rest of the D Gang. Dutt clearly loved the dark zone and the men who populated that world. He fancied himself as a glamorous part of it.

So why is Bollywood crying for the 52-year-old who's still called 'Sanju Baba' – in fondness and perhaps in recognition of his refusal to grow up – and saying that the Supreme Court order sentencing him to five years in jail is "harsh" and "shocking"? Why is it silent on Dutt's multiple misdemeanors? Because Bollywood – no one in Hollywood ever said Mel Gibson was a generally nice man who occasionally beat up his wife and wanted to do away with the Jews, but only when he was drunk – has always protected its big guys and stuck with those who can come good at the counters. Not unlike other institutions in India, actually, if you come to think of it.

If the Hindi film industry has ever come down heavily on those who it feels have erred, it has been the weaklings, the outsiders, the rookies -- people who have dared to point fingers at the successfuls. Remember what happened to Preeti Jain when she accused Madhur Bhandarkar of raping her? (Though the case was recently quashed by the Supreme Court, it wasn't because the high court or the trial court were in agreement. It was because Jain didn't want to fight anymore.) Or when Alisha Chinai said Annu Malik had tried to take advantage of her? Both the women were banished. Immediately labelled pariahs. For that matter, when Vivek Oberoi called a press conference in 2003 to say Salman Khan had phoned him 41 times on a single night and threatened him (the rising star was then dating Aishwarya Rai, who'd just broken up with the Khan), he effectively ended his own Bollywood innings. The next thing he knew, he was an outcast. He's still reeling from what he realises was the biggest mistake of his life.

Why, the film industry even tried to defend Shiney Ahuja and resurrect Monica Bedi's career after she returned from Portugal where she was living with Mumbai blasts accused Abu Salem!

Like its happy endings, Bollywood loves to play it safe. And that's because filmmaking these days, barring a few exceptions, of course, is more about commerce than art and lofty ideals. It has no time or space for ethics -- how many condemned the Godhra killings? -- or for moral politics. That's why we won't have, at least not in a hurry, a Sean Penn who'll pitch a tent in Haiti, help the war-ravaged for months and write about it for the papers back home. Or an Angelina Jolie who'll make a financially risky 'In the Land of Blood and Honey' on the Bosnian crisis of the '90s. Or a Michael Moore who'll protest against just about everything wrong in America.

So when Bollywood speaks up for Dutt -- Jaya Bachchan wants to petition the governor of Maharashtra for mercy -- it shows itself up for what it has become. Bereft of both conscience and conviction. Intelligence even. It rankles and pricks the mind, just like the ludicrous song-and-dance sequences it has made its signature in the name of entertainment, and thinks, rather amazingly, that this circus is what the world likes to watch these days.

The truth is that Bollywood, in a country fanatical about its films, has an influence far greater that it knows or deserves. The least it can do is to not abuse that power. So when an actor turns into a gunslinger outside 70mm, it's time not to beat chests but to call the cops.